LeanLife Health Inc.
LeanLife Health Inc. (LLP.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LLP.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLP.CN | CA$0.02 | +0.00% | 4.1M | -1.00 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| SAP.TO | CA$29.06 | +0.21% | 12B | -70.88 | -CA$0.41 | +2.63% |
| PBH.TO | CA$87.84 | -0.51% | 3.9B | 33.27 | CA$2.64 | +3.88% |
| MFI.TO | CA$29.24 | -1.42% | 3.6B | 38.47 | CA$0.76 | +3.13% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$33.64 | -0.27% | 1.4B | 27.57 | CA$1.22 | +2.49% |
| SOY.TO | CA$8.06 | -4.62% | 947.4M | -67.17 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| HLF.TO | CA$16.94 | -1.40% | 492.3M | 6.47 | CA$2.62 | +4.89% |
| BOIL.CN | CA$2.59 | -3.72% | 185.6M | -7.33 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.03 | +0.00% | 133.3M | -51.50 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.63 | +5.00% | 55.1M | -21.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LLP.CN vs SAP.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while SAP.TO trades at CA$29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -70.88. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check SAP.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs PBH.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PBH.TO trades at CA$87.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check PBH.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs MFI.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while MFI.TO trades at CA$29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check MFI.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs JWEL.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check JWEL.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs SOY.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 947.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while SOY.TO trades at CA$8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -67.17. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check SOY.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs HLF.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HLF.TO has a market cap of 492.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while HLF.TO trades at CA$16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HLF.TO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLF.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to HLF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check HLF.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs BOIL.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BOIL.CN trades at CA$2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to BOIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check BOIL.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs HBFG.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check HBFG.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs GFCO.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check GFCO.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs FRSH.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while FRSH.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and FRSH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRSH.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs SWP.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while SWP.TO trades at CA$4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check SWP.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs BU.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BU.TO trades at CA$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check BU.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs ELMT.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check ELMT.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs NPRA.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check NPRA.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs BABY.TO Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and BABY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BABY.TO's competition here
LLP.CN vs PNGA.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check PNGA.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs PSYC.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and PSYC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSYC.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs EMRG.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and EMRG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMRG.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs BITE.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and BITE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BITE.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs CULT.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and CULT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CULT.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs MOOO.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN is less volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLP.CN.Check MOOO.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs PLBL.NE Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and PLBL.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLBL.NE's competition here
LLP.CN vs VEGI.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and VEGI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEGI.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs MEAT.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 493.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and MEAT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEAT.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs FIT.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and FIT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIT.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs VAGN.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and VAGN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VAGN.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs YUM.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and YUM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUM.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs ARTO.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and ARTO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARTO.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs VEJI.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LLP.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check VEJI.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs MEAL.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and MEAL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEAL.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs FUEL.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LLP.CN and FUEL.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUEL.CN's competition here
LLP.CN vs RSF.CN Comparison August 2025
LLP.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLP.CN stands at 4.1M. In comparison, RSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLP.CN is priced at CA$0.02, while RSF.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLP.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LLP.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LLP.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RSF.CN's competition here