JX Luxventure Limited
JX Luxventure Limited (LLL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LLL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLL | $0.84 | -4.64% | 10.8M | -0.10 | -$8.23 | N/A |
| RL | $301.88 | +2.21% | 18.1B | 25.72 | $11.60 | +1.14% |
| LEVI | $20.43 | -0.63% | 8.1B | 19.47 | $1.05 | +2.59% |
| GIL | $52.56 | +0.78% | 7.9B | 20.49 | $2.55 | +1.65% |
| VFC | $12.54 | -1.14% | 4.9B | 70.36 | $0.18 | +2.84% |
| PVH | $76.95 | +0.98% | 3.7B | 10.84 | $7.09 | +0.20% |
| KTB | $61.99 | -1.75% | 3.5B | 15.33 | $4.07 | +3.33% |
| COLM | $60.33 | -0.19% | 3.3B | 15.71 | $3.86 | +1.98% |
| UAA | $7.15 | -0.28% | 3B | -15.65 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.75 | -0.44% | 3B | -14.70 | -$0.47 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LLL vs RL Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while RL trades at $301.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check RL's competition here
LLL vs LEVI Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while LEVI trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check LEVI's competition here
LLL vs GIL Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while GIL trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check GIL's competition here
LLL vs VFC Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while VFC trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check VFC's competition here
LLL vs PVH Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while PVH trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check PVH's competition here
LLL vs KTB Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while KTB trades at $61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check KTB's competition here
LLL vs COLM Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while COLM trades at $60.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check COLM's competition here
LLL vs UAA Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while UAA trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check UAA's competition here
LLL vs UA Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while UA trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check UA's competition here
LLL vs ZGN Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while ZGN trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check ZGN's competition here
LLL vs AIN Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while AIN trades at $72.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check AIN's competition here
LLL vs HBI Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while HBI trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check HBI's competition here
LLL vs GOOS Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while GOOS trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check GOOS's competition here
LLL vs FIGS Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while FIGS trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 653.50. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check FIGS's competition here
LLL vs GIII Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while GIII trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check GIII's competition here
LLL vs OXM Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 637.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while OXM trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check OXM's competition here
LLL vs SGC Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while SGC trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check SGC's competition here
LLL vs LAKE Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while LAKE trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check LAKE's competition here
LLL vs UFI Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while UFI trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check UFI's competition here
LLL vs CULP Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while CULP trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check CULP's competition here
LLL vs JRSH Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while JRSH trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -49.57. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check JRSH's competition here
LLL vs JL Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while JL trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check JL's competition here
LLL vs VNCE Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while VNCE trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check VNCE's competition here
LLL vs PMNT Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while PMNT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check PMNT's competition here
LLL vs NCI Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while NCI trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check NCI's competition here
LLL vs DXYN Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while DXYN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check DXYN's competition here
LLL vs JXJT Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check JXJT's competition here
LLL vs DLA Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check DLA's competition here
LLL vs XELB Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while XELB trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is more volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check XELB's competition here
LLL vs KBSF Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check KBSF's competition here
LLL vs SQBG Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check SQBG's competition here
LLL vs EVK Comparison July 2025
LLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLL stands at 10.8M. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLL is priced at $0.84, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLL's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLL is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLL.Check EVK's competition here