Lloyds Banking Group plc
Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLD.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LLD.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLD.DE | €1.06 | -2.30% | 61.5B | 13.13 | €0.08 | +3.71% |
| BNP.DE | €80.21 | -2.18% | 89.3B | 7.89 | €10.29 | +9.10% |
| IES.DE | €5.09 | +0.32% | 88.7B | 8.95 | €0.57 | +7.00% |
| UB5.DE | €44.32 | -0.58% | 68.9B | 11.13 | €3.98 | +4.00% |
| DBK.DE | €24.86 | -1.56% | 47.4B | 8.06 | €3.09 | +2.73% |
| SGE.F | €61.10 | -3.90% | 45.8B | 9.22 | €6.80 | +2.73% |
| SGE.DE | €61.00 | -3.76% | 45.5B | 9.16 | €6.80 | +2.73% |
| CBK.DE | €29.90 | -5.05% | 34.5B | 13.12 | €2.33 | +2.13% |
| FRYA.F | €28.16 | +1.00% | 31.1B | 10.33 | €2.68 | +9.92% |
| SEBC.F | €15.76 | -0.88% | 30.8B | 10.99 | €1.43 | +13.24% |
Stock Comparison
LLD.DE vs BNP.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while BNP.DE trades at €80.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check BNP.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs IES.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while IES.DE trades at €5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check IES.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs UB5.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, UB5.DE has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while UB5.DE trades at €44.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas UB5.DE's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UB5.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to UB5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check UB5.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs DBK.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while DBK.DE trades at €24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check DBK.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs SGE.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while SGE.F trades at €61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check SGE.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs SGE.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while SGE.DE trades at €61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check SGE.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs CBK.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while CBK.DE trades at €29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check CBK.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs FRYA.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, FRYA.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while FRYA.F trades at €28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas FRYA.F's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRYA.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to FRYA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check FRYA.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs SEBC.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while SEBC.F trades at €15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to SEBC.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check SEBC.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs BIRG.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while BIRG.DE trades at €15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to BIRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check BIRG.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs 4FY.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, 4FY.F has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while 4FY.F trades at €2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas 4FY.F's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4FY.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to 4FY.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check 4FY.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs KTB1.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while KTB1.F trades at €0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check KTB1.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs RN70.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, RN70.F has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while RN70.F trades at €13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas RN70.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RN70.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to RN70.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check RN70.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs RAW.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while RAW.DE trades at €35.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check RAW.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs TMLF.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while TMLF.F trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to TMLF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check TMLF.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs 47T.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, 47T.F has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while 47T.F trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas 47T.F's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 47T.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to 47T.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check 47T.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs ARLN.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while ARLN.DE trades at €33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check ARLN.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs ARL.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while ARL.DE trades at €33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check ARL.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs ARLN.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while ARLN.F trades at €33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check ARLN.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs ZYE1.F Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while ZYE1.F trades at €25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to ZYE1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check ZYE1.F's competition here
LLD.DE vs PCZ.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, PCZ.DE has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while PCZ.DE trades at €7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas PCZ.DE's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCZ.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to PCZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check PCZ.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs UBK.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while UBK.DE trades at €3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 193.50. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to UBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check UBK.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs QB7.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while QB7.DE trades at €3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to QB7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check QB7.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs MBK.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while MBK.DE trades at €17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to MBK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check MBK.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs MULT.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MULT.DE has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while MULT.DE trades at €6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MULT.DE's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MULT.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to MULT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check MULT.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs VG80.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, VG80.DE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while VG80.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas VG80.DE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VG80.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to VG80.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check VG80.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs VG8.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while VG8.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is more volatile compared to VG8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check VG8.DE's competition here
LLD.DE vs MBC.DE Comparison April 2026
LLD.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLD.DE stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LLD.DE is priced at €1.06, while MBC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.13, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LLD.DE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LLD.DE is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLD.DE.Check MBC.DE's competition here