LIC Housing Finance Limited
LIC Housing Finance Limited (LICHSGFIN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LICHSGFIN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹531.95 | +0.00% | 300.8B | 5.48 | ₹99.72 | +1.83% |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹87.32 | +0.00% | 731.1B | 29.56 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹532.05 | +0.00% | 300.9B | 5.49 | ₹99.72 | +1.83% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹831.70 | +0.00% | 221.2B | 10.14 | ₹83.75 | +0.59% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹833.10 | +0.00% | 221.2B | 10.13 | ₹83.81 | +0.59% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹452.30 | -0.01% | 198.4B | 19.62 | ₹23.30 | N/A |
| HOMEFIRST.NS | ₹1,205.10 | +0.00% | 129.9B | 25.49 | ₹48.95 | +0.30% |
| HOMEFIRST.BO | ₹1,204.85 | +0.00% | 129.7B | 25.45 | ₹48.95 | +0.30% |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹153.25 | +0.00% | 128.7B | 8.62 | ₹18.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LICHSGFIN.BO vs HDFC.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 731.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹87.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 300.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹532.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹831.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹833.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹452.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹1,205.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹1,204.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹153.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs APTUS.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹236.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs APTUS.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹882.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹883.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs AAVAS.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,267.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs AAVAS.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,269.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while IBULHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹164.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IBULHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while IBULHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹164.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas IBULHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹714.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹713.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹387.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹154.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs SRGHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, SRGHFL.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while SRGHFL.NS trades at ₹260.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SRGHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRGHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check SRGHFL.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹260.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs RELHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs RHFL.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to RHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check RHFL.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs RHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to RHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check RHFL.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs TFL.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, TFL.BO has a market cap of 801.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while TFL.BO trades at ₹12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas TFL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check TFL.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs TFL.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 800.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while TFL.NS trades at ₹12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check TFL.NS's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs RFL.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, RFL.BO has a market cap of 420.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while RFL.BO trades at ₹129.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas RFL.BO's P/E ratio is -200.74. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RFL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to RFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check RFL.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 337.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
LICHSGFIN.BO vs DHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
LICHSGFIN.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LICHSGFIN.BO stands at 300.8B. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LICHSGFIN.BO is priced at ₹531.95, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LICHSGFIN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.48, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LICHSGFIN.BO is more volatile compared to DHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LICHSGFIN.BO.Check DHFL.NS's competition here