Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (LG9.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LG9.SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG9.SI | SGD 18.35 | -4.38% | 2.2B | 12.13 | SGD 1.51 | N/A |
| ES3.SI | SGD 4.88 | -0.41% | 2.9B | 14.92 | SGD 0.33 | +3.55% |
| HKB.SI | SGD 3.60 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 7.50 | SGD 0.48 | N/A |
| 0P0001EF2T.SI | SGD 31.01 | +0.00% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P15.SI | SGD 0.49 | -2.02% | 1.3B | -48.50 | -SGD 0.01 | +16.82% |
| YF8.SI | SGD 0.25 | +0.00% | 870.1M | -6.25 | -SGD 0.04 | +13.80% |
| CLR.SI | SGD 0.80 | +0.00% | 867.1M | N/A | N/A | +5.60% |
| CFA.SI | SGD 0.79 | -0.25% | 695.8M | 9.53 | SGD 0.08 | +5.55% |
| P58.SI | SGD 9.82 | +0.00% | 502.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| P60.SI | SGD 6.33 | +0.00% | 353.6M | 11.86 | SGD 0.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LG9.SI vs ES3.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ES3.SI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while ES3.SI trades at SGD 4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas ES3.SI's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ES3.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to ES3.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check ES3.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs HKB.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HKB.SI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while HKB.SI trades at SGD 3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas HKB.SI's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKB.SI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to HKB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check HKB.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs 0P0001EF2T.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, 0P0001EF2T.SI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while 0P0001EF2T.SI trades at SGD 31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0P0001EF2T.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI's ROE of +111.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001EF2T.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check 0P0001EF2T.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs P15.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, P15.SI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while P15.SI trades at SGD 0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas P15.SI's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P15.SI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to P15.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check P15.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs YF8.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YF8.SI has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while YF8.SI trades at SGD 0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas YF8.SI's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YF8.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to YF8.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check YF8.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs CLR.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CLR.SI has a market cap of 867.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while CLR.SI trades at SGD 0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas CLR.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLR.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to CLR.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check CLR.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs CFA.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CFA.SI has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while CFA.SI trades at SGD 0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas CFA.SI's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFA.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to CFA.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check CFA.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs P58.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, P58.SI has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while P58.SI trades at SGD 9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas P58.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P58.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to P58.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check P58.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs P60.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, P60.SI has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while P60.SI trades at SGD 6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas P60.SI's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P60.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to P60.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check P60.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs B73.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, B73.SI has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while B73.SI trades at SGD 0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas B73.SI's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to B73.SI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to B73.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check B73.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs SRT.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SRT.SI has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while SRT.SI trades at SGD 0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas SRT.SI's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRT.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to SRT.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check SRT.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs BLS.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BLS.SI has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while BLS.SI trades at SGD 1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas BLS.SI's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLS.SI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to BLS.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check BLS.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs O9A.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, O9A.SI has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while O9A.SI trades at SGD 2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas O9A.SI's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to O9A.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to O9A.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check O9A.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs 42T.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, 42T.SI has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while 42T.SI trades at SGD 0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 42T.SI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 42T.SI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to 42T.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check 42T.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs KJ7.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KJ7.SI has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while KJ7.SI trades at SGD 10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas KJ7.SI's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KJ7.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to KJ7.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check KJ7.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs 5SY.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, 5SY.SI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while 5SY.SI trades at SGD 0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 5SY.SI's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 5SY.SI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to 5SY.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check 5SY.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs BRS.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRS.SI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while BRS.SI trades at SGD 0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas BRS.SI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRS.SI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to BRS.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check BRS.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs 0P00006FYT.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, 0P00006FYT.SI has a market cap of 39.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while 0P00006FYT.SI trades at SGD 3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0P00006FYT.SI's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00006FYT.SI's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to 0P00006FYT.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check 0P00006FYT.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs YLD.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YLD.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while YLD.SI trades at SGD 1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas YLD.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YLD.SI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is less volatile compared to YLD.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check YLD.SI's competition here
LG9.SI vs 0P0001AF7Z.SI Comparison April 2026
LG9.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LG9.SI stands at 2.2B. In comparison, 0P0001AF7Z.SI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LG9.SI is priced at SGD 18.35, while 0P0001AF7Z.SI trades at SGD 32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LG9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.13, whereas 0P0001AF7Z.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LG9.SI's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LG9.SI is more volatile compared to 0P0001AF7Z.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LG9.SI.Check 0P0001AF7Z.SI's competition here