Latitude Group Holdings Limited
Latitude Group Holdings Limited (LFS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFS.AX | A$0.92 | -1.08% | 956.6M | 11.50 | A$0.08 | +9.78% |
| ZIP.AX | A$2.43 | +0.83% | 3B | 30.13 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| LFG.AX | A$3.36 | -2.89% | 1B | 7.13 | A$0.48 | +16.79% |
| PPM.AX | A$1.74 | -0.85% | 763.7M | 7.39 | A$0.23 | +15.71% |
| CCP.AX | A$10.72 | +0.85% | 721.5M | 7.74 | A$1.37 | +6.42% |
| OBL.AX | A$1.65 | +0.00% | 504M | 1.07 | A$1.63 | N/A |
| HUM.AX | A$0.64 | +0.79% | 317.8M | 12.60 | A$0.05 | +3.57% |
| SVR.AX | A$1.60 | -1.23% | 302.2M | 10.00 | A$0.16 | +11.88% |
| PLT.AX | A$0.96 | +2.69% | 177.7M | -12.19 | -A$0.08 | N/A |
| FSA.AX | A$1.17 | -0.43% | 145.7M | 11.65 | A$0.10 | +6.01% |
Stock Comparison
LFS.AX vs ZIP.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, ZIP.AX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while ZIP.AX trades at A$2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas ZIP.AX's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZIP.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to ZIP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check ZIP.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs LFG.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, LFG.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while LFG.AX trades at A$3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas LFG.AX's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LFG.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to LFG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check LFG.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PPM.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, PPM.AX has a market cap of 763.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PPM.AX trades at A$1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PPM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPM.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PPM.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs CCP.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, CCP.AX has a market cap of 721.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while CCP.AX trades at A$10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas CCP.AX's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCP.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to CCP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check CCP.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs OBL.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, OBL.AX has a market cap of 504M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while OBL.AX trades at A$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas OBL.AX's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBL.AX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to OBL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check OBL.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs HUM.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, HUM.AX has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while HUM.AX trades at A$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas HUM.AX's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUM.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to HUM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check HUM.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs SVR.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, SVR.AX has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while SVR.AX trades at A$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SVR.AX's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVR.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to SVR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check SVR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PLT.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, PLT.AX has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PLT.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PLT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLT.AX's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PLT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PLT.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs FSA.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, FSA.AX has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while FSA.AX trades at A$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas FSA.AX's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSA.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and FSA.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSA.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PNC.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, PNC.AX has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PNC.AX trades at A$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PNC.AX's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNC.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PNC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PNC.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs SZL.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, SZL.AX has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while SZL.AX trades at A$24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas SZL.AX's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZL.AX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to SZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check SZL.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs HMY.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, HMY.AX has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while HMY.AX trades at A$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas HMY.AX's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMY.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to HMY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check HMY.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PGL.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, PGL.AX has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PGL.AX trades at A$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PGL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGL.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PGL.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs MME.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, MME.AX has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while MME.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas MME.AX's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MME.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to MME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check MME.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs EPY.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, EPY.AX has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while EPY.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas EPY.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPY.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and EPY.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPY.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs WZR.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, WZR.AX has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while WZR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas WZR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WZR.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to WZR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check WZR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs BTN.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, BTN.AX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while BTN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas BTN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTN.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and BTN.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTN.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PYR.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, PYR.AX has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PYR.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas PYR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYR.AX's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PYR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs LAW.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, LAW.AX has a market cap of 319.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while LAW.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas LAW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and LAW.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAW.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs MNY.AX Comparison April 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 956.6M. In comparison, MNY.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while MNY.AX trades at A$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 11.50, whereas MNY.AX's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNY.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to MNY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check MNY.AX's competition here