Latitude Group Holdings Limited (LFS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFS.AX | A$0.92 | +1.67% | 951.4M | 10.93 | A$0.08 | +9.84% |
| ZIP.AX | A$2.98 | -5.10% | 3.7B | 35.90 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| LFG.AX | A$3.32 | +0.30% | 1B | 7.01 | A$0.47 | +15.06% |
| CCP.AX | A$13.17 | -1.72% | 896.4M | 9.64 | A$1.37 | +5.16% |
| PPM.AX | A$1.60 | +0.63% | 718.8M | 6.91 | A$0.23 | +16.69% |
| OBL.AX | A$1.64 | +0.00% | 473.6M | 1.01 | A$1.62 | N/A |
| RMC.AX | A$0.80 | +0.00% | 316.4M | 6.57 | A$0.12 | +20.63% |
| SVR.AX | A$1.60 | +0.00% | 298.6M | 8.64 | A$0.19 | +11.88% |
| HUM.AX | A$0.47 | +1.09% | 242.1M | 4.85 | A$0.10 | +4.84% |
| FSA.AX | A$1.29 | -0.39% | 161.3M | 15.66 | A$0.08 | +5.43% |
Stock Comparison
LFS.AX vs ZIP.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, ZIP.AX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while ZIP.AX trades at A$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas ZIP.AX's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZIP.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to ZIP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check ZIP.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs LFG.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, LFG.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while LFG.AX trades at A$3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas LFG.AX's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LFG.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to LFG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check LFG.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs CCP.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, CCP.AX has a market cap of 896.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while CCP.AX trades at A$13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas CCP.AX's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCP.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to CCP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check CCP.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PPM.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, PPM.AX has a market cap of 718.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PPM.AX trades at A$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PPM.AX's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPM.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PPM.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs OBL.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, OBL.AX has a market cap of 473.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while OBL.AX trades at A$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas OBL.AX's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBL.AX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to OBL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check OBL.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs RMC.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, RMC.AX has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while RMC.AX trades at A$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas RMC.AX's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RMC.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to RMC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check RMC.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs SVR.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, SVR.AX has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while SVR.AX trades at A$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SVR.AX's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVR.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to SVR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check SVR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs HUM.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, HUM.AX has a market cap of 242.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while HUM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas HUM.AX's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUM.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to HUM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check HUM.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs FSA.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, FSA.AX has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while FSA.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas FSA.AX's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSA.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and FSA.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSA.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PLT.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, PLT.AX has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PLT.AX trades at A$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PLT.AX's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLT.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PLT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PLT.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PNC.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, PNC.AX has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PNC.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PNC.AX's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNC.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and PNC.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNC.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs SZL.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, SZL.AX has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while SZL.AX trades at A$24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas SZL.AX's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZL.AX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to SZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check SZL.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs HMY.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, HMY.AX has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while HMY.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas HMY.AX's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMY.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to HMY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check HMY.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs MME.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, MME.AX has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while MME.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas MME.AX's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MME.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to MME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check MME.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs EPY.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, EPY.AX has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while EPY.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas EPY.AX's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPY.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to EPY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check EPY.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs WZR.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, WZR.AX has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while WZR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas WZR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WZR.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to WZR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check WZR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs BTN.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, BTN.AX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while BTN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas BTN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTN.AX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to BTN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check BTN.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs PYR.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, PYR.AX has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while PYR.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas PYR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYR.AX's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to PYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check PYR.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs LAW.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, LAW.AX has a market cap of 319.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while LAW.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas LAW.AX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAW.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX and LAW.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAW.AX's competition here
LFS.AX vs MNY.AX Comparison July 2026
LFS.AX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFS.AX stands at 951.4M. In comparison, MNY.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFS.AX is priced at A$0.92, while MNY.AX trades at A$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 10.93, whereas MNY.AX's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, LFS.AX's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNY.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFS.AX is less volatile compared to MNY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFS.AX.Check MNY.AX's competition here