Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF
Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUW.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCUW.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCUW.DE | €19.60 | -1.01% | 6.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €361.87 | -0.15% | 3T | 17.10 | €21.16 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €313.42 | -0.15% | 2.6T | 17.10 | €18.32 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €305.98 | -0.10% | 2.6T | 16.89 | €18.11 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €146.10 | +3.85% | 178B | 45.65 | €3.18 | +2.48% |
| ZPDW.DE | €80.38 | +0.13% | 125.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| IWLE.DE | €9.29 | +0.80% | 119.5B | N/A | N/A | +1.19% |
| SXR8.DE | €589.18 | +0.36% | 110.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNL.DE | €104.91 | +0.32% | 102.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LCUW.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €361.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €313.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €305.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while BBN1.F trades at €146.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check BBN1.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while ZPDW.DE trades at €80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SXR8.DE trades at €589.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EUNL.DE trades at €104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while U1FB.DE trades at €25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check U1FB.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VUAA.DE trades at €105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VUSA.DE trades at €104.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SXRZ.DE trades at €250.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VGWL.DE trades at €133.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs E500.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while E500.DE trades at €49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs P500.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while P500.DE trades at €1,096.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs D500.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while D500.DE trades at €51.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check D500.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VWCE.DE trades at €136.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VGWL.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check A4S.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,096.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IS3N.DE trades at €35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs AW1Q.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while AW1Q.DE trades at €18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SPY5.DE trades at €551.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IBC3.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs NQSE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while LYP2.DE trades at €317.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 6TVM.DE trades at €56.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs LYPS.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while LYPS.DE trades at €56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while PPFB.SG trades at €55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XDWD.DE trades at €114.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XDWL.DE trades at €95.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while TR1.DU trades at €93.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check TR1.DU's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IUSA.DE trades at €55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,149.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EQQQ.DE trades at €490.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while QDVE.DE trades at €32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IUSQ.DE trades at €87.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while JUHE.DE trades at €51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SPPW.DE trades at €38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SLUS.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EUNK.DE trades at €88.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while DWS.DE trades at €54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check DWS.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while JREU.DE trades at €54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while JRUD.DE trades at €51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XD9E.DE trades at €130.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XD9U.DE trades at €162.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
LCUW.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while LYYA.DE trades at €357.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while STXH.DE trades at €146.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XDEW.DE trades at €88.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while D5BM.DE trades at €110.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while LYP6.DE trades at €269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXS1.DE trades at €201.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXSA.DE trades at €56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VGVE.DE trades at €103.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VGVF.DE trades at €107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs CBUE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IQQW.DE trades at €76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while DBXW.DE trades at €112.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XZMU.DE trades at €59.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXW1.DE trades at €55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EUNW.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while VGWD.DE trades at €66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SPP1.DE trades at €22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IBCF.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IBCF.DE trades at €134.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IBCF.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check DBXE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SXR7.DE trades at €207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XMME.DE trades at €58.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while H4ZF.DE trades at €55.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XIEE.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XIEE.DE trades at €79.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XIEE.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while XZW0.DE trades at €41.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check EXIC.F's competition here
LCUW.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while DBXD.DE trades at €228.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
LCUW.DE vs SPYY.DE Comparison August 2025
LCUW.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUW.DE stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPYY.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUW.DE is priced at €19.60, while SPYY.DE trades at €231.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUW.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPYY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUW.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPYY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUW.DE is more volatile compared to SPYY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUW.DE.Check SPYY.DE's competition here