Tidewater Renewables Ltd.
Tidewater Renewables Ltd. (LCFS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCFS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCFS.TO | CA$3.46 | +12.34% | 126M | -0.35 | -CA$10.01 | N/A |
| BEP-PM.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.00% | 16.4B | -37.82 | -CA$0.66 | +6.05% |
| BEP-PK.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.00% | 16.2B | -37.82 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| BEP-UN.TO | CA$35.16 | +2.09% | 10B | -26.44 | -CA$1.33 | +5.75% |
| BEPC.TO | CA$47.31 | +1.94% | 6.9B | -4.67 | -CA$10.13 | +4.31% |
| AQN.TO | CA$8.04 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 134.00 | CA$0.06 | +4.52% |
| NPI.TO | CA$22.28 | +0.77% | 5.8B | -106.10 | -CA$0.21 | +5.57% |
| RNW.TO | CA$12.48 | +1.13% | 3.3B | 41.60 | CA$0.30 | N/A |
| BLX.TO | CA$29.76 | +0.68% | 3.1B | -330.67 | -CA$0.09 | +2.22% |
| INE.TO | CA$13.74 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 72.32 | CA$0.19 | +2.62% |
Stock Comparison
LCFS.TO vs BEP-PM.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, BEP-PM.TO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while BEP-PM.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BEP-PM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.82. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to BEP-PM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to BEP-PM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BEP-PM.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs BEP-PK.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, BEP-PK.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while BEP-PK.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BEP-PK.TO's P/E ratio is -37.82. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to BEP-PK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to BEP-PK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BEP-PK.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs BEP-UN.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, BEP-UN.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while BEP-UN.TO trades at CA$35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BEP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -26.44. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to BEP-UN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to BEP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BEP-UN.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs BEPC.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, BEPC.TO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while BEPC.TO trades at CA$47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BEPC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to BEPC.TO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to BEPC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BEPC.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs AQN.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, AQN.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while AQN.TO trades at CA$8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas AQN.TO's P/E ratio is 134.00. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to AQN.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to AQN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check AQN.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs NPI.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, NPI.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while NPI.TO trades at CA$22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas NPI.TO's P/E ratio is -106.10. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to NPI.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to NPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check NPI.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs RNW.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, RNW.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while RNW.TO trades at CA$12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas RNW.TO's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to RNW.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to RNW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check RNW.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs BLX.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, BLX.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while BLX.TO trades at CA$29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BLX.TO's P/E ratio is -330.67. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to BLX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to BLX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check BLX.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs INE.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, INE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while INE.TO trades at CA$13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas INE.TO's P/E ratio is 72.32. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to INE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to INE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check INE.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs ARR.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, ARR.TO has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while ARR.TO trades at CA$12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ARR.TO's P/E ratio is -400.00. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to ARR.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to ARR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check ARR.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs PIF.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, PIF.TO has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while PIF.TO trades at CA$12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PIF.TO's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to PIF.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to PIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check PIF.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs SPG.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, SPG.TO has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while SPG.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SPG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to SPG.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to SPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check SPG.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs SXI.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, SXI.TO has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while SXI.TO trades at CA$2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SXI.TO's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to SXI.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to SXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check SXI.TO's competition here
LCFS.TO vs MOVE.NE Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, MOVE.NE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while MOVE.NE trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MOVE.NE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to MOVE.NE's ROE of -4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is more volatile compared to MOVE.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check MOVE.NE's competition here
LCFS.TO vs ETX.TO Comparison August 2025
LCFS.TO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFS.TO stands at 126M. In comparison, ETX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCFS.TO is priced at CA$3.46, while ETX.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ETX.TO's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, LCFS.TO's ROE is -2.22%, compared to ETX.TO's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFS.TO is less volatile compared to ETX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFS.TO.Check ETX.TO's competition here