Libero Copper & Gold Corporation
Libero Copper & Gold Corporation (LBCMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBCMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBCMF | $0.12 | +4.20% | 15.2M | -1.35 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 49.9B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $18.77 | +2.12% | 14.1B | 100.58 | $0.19 | +3.89% |
| ANGPY | $7.46 | +0.95% | 11.8B | 149.70 | $0.05 | +8.62% |
| IMPUY | $9.59 | +2.90% | 8.6B | -9.08 | -$1.06 | N/A |
| IMPUF | $9.21 | -3.05% | 8.3B | -8.61 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $9.22 | -0.54% | 5.1B | -31.47 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $8.51 | +0.12% | 3.4B | 19.34 | $0.44 | +0.94% |
| GMINF | $11.95 | +2.14% | 2.7B | 22.88 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LBCMF vs AUXIF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AUXIF's competition here
LBCMF vs FNLPF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while FNLPF trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 100.58. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check FNLPF's competition here
LBCMF vs ANGPY Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ANGPY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 149.70. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ANGPY's competition here
LBCMF vs IMPUY Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while IMPUY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check IMPUY's competition here
LBCMF vs IMPUF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while IMPUF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check IMPUF's competition here
LBCMF vs OICT Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while OICT trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check OICT's competition here
LBCMF vs NMPNF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check NMPNF's competition here
LBCMF vs JINFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while JINFF trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check JINFF's competition here
LBCMF vs GMINF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GMINF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GMINF's competition here
LBCMF vs POYYF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check POYYF's competition here
LBCMF vs ZMPLF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ZMPLF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
LBCMF vs AUCOY Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AUCOY's competition here
LBCMF vs ABBRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 512.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ABBRF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -35.64. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ABBRF's competition here
LBCMF vs GLGDF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GLGDF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 147.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GLGDF's competition here
LBCMF vs TPRFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TPRFF's competition here
LBCMF vs GOTRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GOTRF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GOTRF's competition here
LBCMF vs TIHRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TIHRF's competition here
LBCMF vs SAPLF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SAPLF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SAPLF's competition here
LBCMF vs BRVMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 237.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BRVMF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -72.67. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BRVMF's competition here
LBCMF vs PLLHF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PLLHF's competition here
LBCMF vs SLVTF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 167.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SLVTF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -40.69. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SLVTF's competition here
LBCMF vs IAUFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while IAUFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check IAUFF's competition here
LBCMF vs BOCOF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BOCOF's competition here
LBCMF vs XANAF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check XANAF's competition here
LBCMF vs BKRRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BKRRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BKRRF's competition here
LBCMF vs HEGLF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while HEGLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check HEGLF's competition here
LBCMF vs SDRC Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SDRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -290.10. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SDRC's competition here
LBCMF vs CTNXF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CTNXF's competition here
LBCMF vs PDIV Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PDIV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PDIV's competition here
LBCMF vs VLMGF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while VLMGF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check VLMGF's competition here
LBCMF vs PAASF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PAASF's competition here
LBCMF vs ARRKF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ARRKF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ARRKF's competition here
LBCMF vs CHPGF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CHPGF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CHPGF's competition here
LBCMF vs INMNF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check INMNF's competition here
LBCMF vs EMPYF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while EMPYF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check EMPYF's competition here
LBCMF vs LUCRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while LUCRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check LUCRF's competition here
LBCMF vs OCGSF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while OCGSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check OCGSF's competition here
LBCMF vs CAPTF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CAPTF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -30.36. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CAPTF's competition here
LBCMF vs PDLMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PDLMF's competition here
LBCMF vs SMDRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SMDRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -27.85. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SMDRF's competition here
LBCMF vs DNCVF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while DNCVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check DNCVF's competition here
LBCMF vs ORVMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ORVMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ORVMF's competition here
LBCMF vs SSVFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SSVFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SSVFF's competition here
LBCMF vs BRGC Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BRGC's competition here
LBCMF vs SNNGF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SNNGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SNNGF's competition here
LBCMF vs ADYRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ADYRF's competition here
LBCMF vs ACKRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ACKRF's competition here
LBCMF vs TSORF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TSORF's competition here
LBCMF vs BBBXF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BBBXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BBBXF's competition here
LBCMF vs KDKCF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while KDKCF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check KDKCF's competition here
LBCMF vs DYNR Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while DYNR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check DYNR's competition here
LBCMF vs TEUTF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TEUTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TEUTF's competition here
LBCMF vs SSVRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SSVRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -29.73. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SSVRF's competition here
LBCMF vs ELRFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ELRFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ELRFF's competition here
LBCMF vs HMRRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check HMRRF's competition here
LBCMF vs FCSUF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check FCSUF's competition here
LBCMF vs WAMFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while WAMFF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check WAMFF's competition here
LBCMF vs SCTSF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SCTSF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SCTSF's competition here
LBCMF vs OKPRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check OKPRF's competition here
LBCMF vs TBXXF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TBXXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TBXXF's competition here
LBCMF vs VTXXF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check VTXXF's competition here
LBCMF vs TLSMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check TLSMF's competition here
LBCMF vs SMOFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SMOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SMOFF's competition here
LBCMF vs EQMEF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while EQMEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check EQMEF's competition here
LBCMF vs ACRG Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ACRG's competition here
LBCMF vs ATEPF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ATEPF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ATEPF's competition here
LBCMF vs MMNGF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while MMNGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check MMNGF's competition here
LBCMF vs GBRRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GBRRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GBRRF's competition here
LBCMF vs DNRSF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while DNRSF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check DNRSF's competition here
LBCMF vs ASLRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check ASLRF's competition here
LBCMF vs GLDRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GLDRF's competition here
LBCMF vs SHGDF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SHGDF's competition here
LBCMF vs KGFMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while KGFMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check KGFMF's competition here
LBCMF vs NAUFF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while NAUFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check NAUFF's competition here
LBCMF vs EMPPF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while EMPPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check EMPPF's competition here
LBCMF vs GSMGF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check GSMGF's competition here
LBCMF vs AGMRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AGMRF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AGMRF's competition here
LBCMF vs WEXPF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while WEXPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check WEXPF's competition here
LBCMF vs VIPRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while VIPRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check VIPRF's competition here
LBCMF vs CTMCF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CTMCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CTMCF's competition here
LBCMF vs AGLDF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AGLDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AGLDF's competition here
LBCMF vs AMNP Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AMNP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AMNP's competition here
LBCMF vs LGCXF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while LGCXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check LGCXF's competition here
LBCMF vs URVNF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check URVNF's competition here
LBCMF vs AUCUF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AUCUF's competition here
LBCMF vs MRZLF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while MRZLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check MRZLF's competition here
LBCMF vs THMG Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while THMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check THMG's competition here
LBCMF vs MERG Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check MERG's competition here
LBCMF vs PVGDF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PVGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PVGDF's competition here
LBCMF vs HGLD Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check HGLD's competition here
LBCMF vs VOYRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check VOYRF's competition here
LBCMF vs PNTRF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PNTRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PNTRF's competition here
LBCMF vs CJIMF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CJIMF's competition here
LBCMF vs AUSVF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check AUSVF's competition here
LBCMF vs SEKZF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check SEKZF's competition here
LBCMF vs BYRG Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, BYRG has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while BYRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas BYRG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to BYRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is less volatile compared to BYRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check BYRG's competition here
LBCMF vs CNRIF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CNRIF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while CNRIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas CNRIF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to CNRIF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to CNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check CNRIF's competition here
LBCMF vs PGLDF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while PGLDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check PGLDF's competition here
LBCMF vs HBEIF Comparison August 2025
LBCMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBCMF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBCMF is priced at $0.12, while HBEIF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBCMF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.35, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, LBCMF's ROE is -2.56%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -63.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBCMF is more volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBCMF.Check HBEIF's competition here