Location Based Technologies, Inc.
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (LBAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBAS | $0.00 | +4.76% | 1.6M | -0.22 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $361.31 | -5.16% | 88.1B | 32.99 | $11.01 | +0.66% |
| HNHPF | $11.65 | +2.73% | 80.9B | 14.21 | $0.82 | +2.34% |
| VEMLY | $49.80 | +3.21% | 72.3B | 15.18 | $3.28 | +5.95% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | +0.00% | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +5.99% |
| HXGBF | $11.50 | +0.00% | 29.6B | 28.05 | $0.41 | +1.38% |
| HXGBY | $10.95 | -1.73% | 29.2B | 26.78 | $0.41 | +1.40% |
| MRAAY | $7.43 | +0.95% | 27.3B | 18.97 | $0.39 | +1.38% |
| MRAAF | $13.92 | -9.43% | 25.7B | 16.38 | $0.85 | +2.50% |
| TTDKY | $12.28 | +0.82% | 23.3B | 20.80 | $0.59 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
LBAS vs KYCCF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $361.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check KYCCF's competition here
LBAS vs HNHPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HNHPF's competition here
LBAS vs VEMLY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $49.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VEMLY's competition here
LBAS vs HNHAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HNHAF's competition here
LBAS vs HXGBF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HXGBF's competition here
LBAS vs HXGBY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HXGBY's competition here
LBAS vs MRAAY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MRAAY's competition here
LBAS vs MRAAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MRAAF's competition here
LBAS vs TTDKY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TTDKY's competition here
LBAS vs TTDKF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TTDKF's competition here
LBAS vs BYDIF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check BYDIF's competition here
LBAS vs SNPTF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SNPTF's competition here
LBAS vs SOTGY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $92.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SOTGY's competition here
LBAS vs BYDIY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $211.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check BYDIY's competition here
LBAS vs SHMZF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SHMZF's competition here
LBAS vs MNBEY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MNBEY's competition here
LBAS vs IBIDF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check IBIDF's competition here
LBAS vs MNBEF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MNBEF's competition here
LBAS vs SEPJY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SEPJY's competition here
LBAS vs SEPJF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $52.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SEPJF's competition here
LBAS vs OMRNY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check OMRNY's competition here
LBAS vs HROEY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HROEY's competition here
LBAS vs HRSEF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $116.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HRSEF's competition here
LBAS vs HPHTF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HPHTF's competition here
LBAS vs HPHTY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HPHTY's competition here
LBAS vs AUOTY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AUOTY's competition here
LBAS vs RNSHF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check RNSHF's competition here
LBAS vs VEMLF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VEMLF's competition here
LBAS vs HRIBF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HRIBF's competition here
LBAS vs FITGF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check FITGF's competition here
LBAS vs TYOYY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 170.93. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TYOYY's competition here
LBAS vs APELY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check APELY's competition here
LBAS vs TOPCF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 657.33. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TOPCF's competition here
LBAS vs APELF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check APELF's competition here
LBAS vs NPEGF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -46.10. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check NPEGF's competition here
LBAS vs CODAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check CODAF's competition here
LBAS vs KGBLY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check KGBLY's competition here
LBAS vs AMANF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AMANF's competition here
LBAS vs VAIAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VAIAF's competition here
LBAS vs AITUF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AITUF's competition here
LBAS vs NILRF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check NILRF's competition here
LBAS vs JELLF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check JELLF's competition here
LBAS vs BCNAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check BCNAF's competition here
LBAS vs JNPKF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check JNPKF's competition here
LBAS vs CAZGF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -141.67. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check CAZGF's competition here
LBAS vs JPAVF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check JPAVF's competition here
LBAS vs ASAAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ASAAF's competition here
LBAS vs KRKNF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 756.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check KRKNF's competition here
LBAS vs VARXF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 651.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VARXF's competition here
LBAS vs HNMUF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HNMUF's competition here
LBAS vs JNNDF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 562.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check JNNDF's competition here
LBAS vs JPDYY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check JPDYY's competition here
LBAS vs KACPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check KACPF's competition here
LBAS vs TRUHF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TRUHF's competition here
LBAS vs BCNAY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check BCNAY's competition here
LBAS vs AUDGF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 135.67. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AUDGF's competition here
LBAS vs NNFTF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check NNFTF's competition here
LBAS vs TTGPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TTGPF's competition here
LBAS vs CHAEF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check CHAEF's competition here
LBAS vs NPTSF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check NPTSF's competition here
LBAS vs FUBAF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check FUBAF's competition here
LBAS vs SMOPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SMOPF's competition here
LBAS vs ENMPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ENMPF's competition here
LBAS vs HUDLF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check HUDLF's competition here
LBAS vs IACYF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check IACYF's competition here
LBAS vs ENMPY Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ENMPY's competition here
LBAS vs IKGPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check IKGPF's competition here
LBAS vs SDIIF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SDIIF's competition here
LBAS vs ACFN Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ACFN's competition here
LBAS vs SILLF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SILLF's competition here
LBAS vs MPAD Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MPAD's competition here
LBAS vs AATC Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AATC's competition here
LBAS vs WELX Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check WELX's competition here
LBAS vs IEHC Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check IEHC's competition here
LBAS vs ERMG Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ERMG's competition here
LBAS vs YNVYF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check YNVYF's competition here
LBAS vs NSCIF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check NSCIF's competition here
LBAS vs VPIM Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VPIM's competition here
LBAS vs INRD Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check INRD's competition here
LBAS vs ROBOF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ROBOF's competition here
LBAS vs KESPF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check KESPF's competition here
LBAS vs FGRRF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check FGRRF's competition here
LBAS vs BNSOF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check BNSOF's competition here
LBAS vs AAIRF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check AAIRF's competition here
LBAS vs LCTC Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check LCTC's competition here
LBAS vs ZTSTF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ZTSTF's competition here
LBAS vs GNCLF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check GNCLF's competition here
LBAS vs SIGL Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SIGL's competition here
LBAS vs ESHSF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check ESHSF's competition here
LBAS vs SCND Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SCND's competition here
LBAS vs TNLX Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TNLX's competition here
LBAS vs DPLS Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check DPLS's competition here
LBAS vs RMTD Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check RMTD's competition here
LBAS vs MRRYF Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check MRRYF's competition here
LBAS vs VPER Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check VPER's competition here
LBAS vs SRMX Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check SRMX's competition here
LBAS vs UCLE Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while UCLE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check UCLE's competition here
LBAS vs TRCK Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check TRCK's competition here
LBAS vs EQTL Comparison August 2025
LBAS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBAS stands at 1.6M. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBAS is priced at $0.00, while EQTL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBAS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBAS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBAS is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBAS.Check EQTL's competition here