KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd.
KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd. (KRN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRN.NS | ₹946.25 | +2.74% | 58.8B | 86.81 | ₹10.90 | N/A |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹24,903.00 | +2.72% | 1.1T | 130.40 | ₹190.97 | +0.02% |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹24,901.80 | +2.69% | 1.1T | 130.39 | ₹190.98 | +0.02% |
| PGEL.BO | ₹613.95 | +1.19% | 174.7B | 62.52 | ₹9.82 | +0.04% |
| PGEL.NS | ₹613.35 | +1.02% | 174.5B | 62.40 | ₹9.83 | +0.04% |
| SYRMA.BO | ₹826.95 | -1.69% | 159.3B | 54.05 | ₹15.30 | +0.18% |
| SYRMA.NS | ₹826.95 | -1.76% | 159.3B | 53.98 | ₹15.32 | +0.18% |
| AVALON.NS | ₹978.75 | -0.75% | 65.3B | 68.49 | ₹14.29 | N/A |
| AVALON.BO | ₹977.35 | -0.86% | 65.2B | 67.92 | ₹14.39 | N/A |
| CENTUM.NS | ₹2,780.20 | +4.00% | 41B | -798.91 | -₹3.48 | +0.22% |
Stock Comparison
KRN.NS vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹24,903.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 130.40. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹24,901.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 130.39. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PGEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, PGEL.BO has a market cap of 174.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while PGEL.BO trades at ₹613.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas PGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.52. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PGEL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PGEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, PGEL.NS has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while PGEL.NS trades at ₹613.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas PGEL.NS's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PGEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PGEL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SYRMA.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, SYRMA.BO has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while SYRMA.BO trades at ₹826.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas SYRMA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.05. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYRMA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SYRMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SYRMA.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs SYRMA.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, SYRMA.NS has a market cap of 159.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while SYRMA.NS trades at ₹826.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas SYRMA.NS's P/E ratio is 53.98. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYRMA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SYRMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SYRMA.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs AVALON.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, AVALON.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while AVALON.NS trades at ₹978.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas AVALON.NS's P/E ratio is 68.49. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AVALON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to AVALON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check AVALON.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs AVALON.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, AVALON.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while AVALON.BO trades at ₹977.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas AVALON.BO's P/E ratio is 67.92. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AVALON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to AVALON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check AVALON.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs CENTUM.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, CENTUM.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while CENTUM.NS trades at ₹2,780.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas CENTUM.NS's P/E ratio is -798.91. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CENTUM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to CENTUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CENTUM.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs CENTUM.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, CENTUM.BO has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while CENTUM.BO trades at ₹2,776.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas CENTUM.BO's P/E ratio is -782.14. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CENTUM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to CENTUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CENTUM.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs CYIENTDLM.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while CYIENTDLM.BO trades at ₹319.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas CYIENTDLM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYIENTDLM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CYIENTDLM.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs CYIENTDLM.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while CYIENTDLM.NS trades at ₹319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas CYIENTDLM.NS's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CYIENTDLM.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs RISHABH.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, RISHABH.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while RISHABH.NS trades at ₹420.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas RISHABH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RISHABH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to RISHABH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check RISHABH.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs RISHABH.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹419.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ELPROINTL.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, ELPROINTL.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while ELPROINTL.BO trades at ₹84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas ELPROINTL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELPROINTL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ELPROINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ELPROINTL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs IKIO.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹142.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs IKIO.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs IIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, IIL.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while IIL.BO trades at ₹42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas IIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to IIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check IIL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs MICEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, MICEL.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while MICEL.NS trades at ₹40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas MICEL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.61. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MICEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to MICEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check MICEL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs BCCFUBA.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, BCCFUBA.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while BCCFUBA.BO trades at ₹167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas BCCFUBA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCCFUBA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BCCFUBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BCCFUBA.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs NITIRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, NITIRAJ.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while NITIRAJ.NS trades at ₹209.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas NITIRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NITIRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to NITIRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check NITIRAJ.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs GUJARATPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, GUJARATPOLY.BO has a market cap of 534.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while GUJARATPOLY.BO trades at ₹62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas GUJARATPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GUJARATPOLY.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs INCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, INCAP.BO has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while INCAP.BO trades at ₹80.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas INCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 70.88. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to INCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check INCAP.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs FINELINE.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, FINELINE.BO has a market cap of 404.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while FINELINE.BO trades at ₹84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas FINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is 187.02. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINELINE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to FINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check FINELINE.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs JMDVL.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, JMDVL.BO has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while JMDVL.BO trades at ₹6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas JMDVL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMDVL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to JMDVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check JMDVL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PANELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, PANELEC.BO has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while PANELEC.BO trades at ₹37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas PANELEC.BO's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PANELEC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PANELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PANELEC.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs CONTAINE.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, CONTAINE.BO has a market cap of 94.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while CONTAINE.BO trades at ₹15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas CONTAINE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CONTAINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to CONTAINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CONTAINE.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs TECHCON.BO Comparison February 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 58.8B. In comparison, TECHCON.BO has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹946.25, while TECHCON.BO trades at ₹99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 86.81, whereas TECHCON.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TECHCON.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to TECHCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TECHCON.BO's competition here