Kraken Robotics Inc.
Kraken Robotics Inc. (KRKNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRKNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRKNF | $2.49 | +1.63% | 765.6M | 41.67 | $0.06 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $388.85 | +3.34% | 93.4B | 35.03 | $10.99 | +0.65% |
| HNHPF | $12.02 | +0.84% | 83.7B | 14.69 | $0.82 | +2.31% |
| VEMLY | $49.00 | -0.33% | 71.1B | 14.94 | $3.28 | +5.84% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | +0.00% | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +5.95% |
| HXGBY | $10.96 | +0.55% | 29.8B | 27.39 | $0.40 | +1.42% |
| MRAAY | $7.76 | +2.51% | 28.9B | 19.85 | $0.39 | +1.36% |
| MRAAF | $15.61 | +0.84% | 28.8B | 18.36 | $0.85 | +2.50% |
| HXGBF | $11.49 | -0.09% | 28.1B | 27.33 | $0.40 | +1.38% |
| TTDKF | $11.78 | -6.15% | 23.6B | 20.41 | $0.61 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
KRKNF vs KYCCF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while KYCCF trades at $388.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check KYCCF's competition here
KRKNF vs HNHPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HNHPF trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HNHPF's competition here
KRKNF vs VEMLY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VEMLY trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VEMLY's competition here
KRKNF vs HNHAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HNHAF's competition here
KRKNF vs HXGBY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HXGBY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HXGBY's competition here
KRKNF vs MRAAY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while MRAAY trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check MRAAY's competition here
KRKNF vs MRAAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while MRAAF trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check MRAAF's competition here
KRKNF vs HXGBF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HXGBF trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HXGBF's competition here
KRKNF vs TTDKF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TTDKF trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TTDKF's competition here
KRKNF vs TTDKY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TTDKY trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TTDKY's competition here
KRKNF vs SOTGY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SOTGY trades at $93.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SOTGY's competition here
KRKNF vs BYDIY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while BYDIY trades at $219.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check BYDIY's competition here
KRKNF vs BYDIF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while BYDIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check BYDIF's competition here
KRKNF vs SNPTF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SNPTF trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SNPTF's competition here
KRKNF vs MNBEY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check MNBEY's competition here
KRKNF vs SHMZF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SHMZF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SHMZF's competition here
KRKNF vs MNBEF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while MNBEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check MNBEF's competition here
KRKNF vs IBIDF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while IBIDF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check IBIDF's competition here
KRKNF vs OMRNY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while OMRNY trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 48.87. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check OMRNY's competition here
KRKNF vs SEPJF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SEPJF trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SEPJF's competition here
KRKNF vs SEPJY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SEPJY trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SEPJY's competition here
KRKNF vs HROEY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HROEY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HROEY's competition here
KRKNF vs HRSEF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HRSEF trades at $121.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HRSEF's competition here
KRKNF vs KGBLY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while KGBLY trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check KGBLY's competition here
KRKNF vs HPHTF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HPHTF trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HPHTF's competition here
KRKNF vs AUOTY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AUOTY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AUOTY's competition here
KRKNF vs HPHTY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HPHTY trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HPHTY's competition here
KRKNF vs RNSHF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while RNSHF trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check RNSHF's competition here
KRKNF vs VEMLF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VEMLF's competition here
KRKNF vs HRIBF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HRIBF trades at $60.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HRIBF's competition here
KRKNF vs TOPCF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TOPCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 766.67. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TOPCF's competition here
KRKNF vs TYOYY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TYOYY trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 176.65. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TYOYY's competition here
KRKNF vs FITGF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while FITGF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check FITGF's competition here
KRKNF vs APELY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while APELY trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check APELY's competition here
KRKNF vs APELF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APELF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check APELF's competition here
KRKNF vs NPEGF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NPEGF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -46.48. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NPEGF's competition here
KRKNF vs JELLF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while JELLF trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check JELLF's competition here
KRKNF vs AMANF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AMANF trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AMANF's competition here
KRKNF vs VAIAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VAIAF trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VAIAF's competition here
KRKNF vs AITUF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AITUF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AITUF's competition here
KRKNF vs NILRF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NILRF's competition here
KRKNF vs ASAAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ASAAF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ASAAF's competition here
KRKNF vs CODAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while CODAF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check CODAF's competition here
KRKNF vs BCNAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while BCNAF trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check BCNAF's competition here
KRKNF vs JNPKF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check JNPKF's competition here
KRKNF vs CAZGF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while CAZGF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -141.67. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check CAZGF's competition here
KRKNF vs ERMG Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ERMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ERMG's competition here
KRKNF vs JPAVF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while JPAVF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check JPAVF's competition here
KRKNF vs VARXF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 633.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VARXF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VARXF's competition here
KRKNF vs HNMUF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 559.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HNMUF's competition here
KRKNF vs JNNDF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 521.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check JNNDF's competition here
KRKNF vs TRUHF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TRUHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TRUHF's competition here
KRKNF vs JPDYY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check JPDYY's competition here
KRKNF vs BCNAY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while BCNAY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check BCNAY's competition here
KRKNF vs AUDGF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 326M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AUDGF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AUDGF's competition here
KRKNF vs NNFTF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 324.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NNFTF's competition here
KRKNF vs TTGPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TTGPF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TTGPF's competition here
KRKNF vs NPTSF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NPTSF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NPTSF's competition here
KRKNF vs KACPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while KACPF trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check KACPF's competition here
KRKNF vs FUBAF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check FUBAF's competition here
KRKNF vs SMOPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SMOPF's competition here
KRKNF vs CHAEF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check CHAEF's competition here
KRKNF vs HUDLF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check HUDLF's competition here
KRKNF vs ENMPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ENMPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ENMPF's competition here
KRKNF vs IACYF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check IACYF's competition here
KRKNF vs ENMPY Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ENMPY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ENMPY's competition here
KRKNF vs IKGPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check IKGPF's competition here
KRKNF vs SDIIF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SDIIF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SDIIF's competition here
KRKNF vs ACFN Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ACFN trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ACFN's competition here
KRKNF vs SILLF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SILLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SILLF's competition here
KRKNF vs MPAD Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check MPAD's competition here
KRKNF vs AATC Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AATC trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AATC's competition here
KRKNF vs GNCLF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while GNCLF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check GNCLF's competition here
KRKNF vs IEHC Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while IEHC trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check IEHC's competition here
KRKNF vs WELX Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while WELX trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check WELX's competition here
KRKNF vs FGRRF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check FGRRF's competition here
KRKNF vs YNVYF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check YNVYF's competition here
KRKNF vs NSCIF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NSCIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NSCIF's competition here
KRKNF vs INRD Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check INRD's competition here
KRKNF vs VPIM Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VPIM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VPIM's competition here
KRKNF vs KESPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check KESPF's competition here
KRKNF vs BNSOF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while BNSOF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check BNSOF's competition here
KRKNF vs AAIRF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while AAIRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check AAIRF's competition here
KRKNF vs ROBOF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ROBOF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ROBOF's competition here
KRKNF vs LCTC Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while LCTC trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check LCTC's competition here
KRKNF vs ZTSTF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while ZTSTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check ZTSTF's competition here
KRKNF vs SIGL Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SIGL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SIGL's competition here
KRKNF vs DGNG Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, DGNG has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while DGNG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas DGNG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DGNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to DGNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check DGNG's competition here
KRKNF vs RMTD Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check RMTD's competition here
KRKNF vs SCND Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SCND trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SCND's competition here
KRKNF vs TNLX Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TNLX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TNLX's competition here
KRKNF vs DPLS Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check DPLS's competition here
KRKNF vs VPER Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check VPER's competition here
KRKNF vs UCLE Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, UCLE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while UCLE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas UCLE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UCLE's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to UCLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check UCLE's competition here
KRKNF vs TRCK Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while TRCK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check TRCK's competition here
KRKNF vs NXOPF Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check NXOPF's competition here
KRKNF vs SRMX Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check SRMX's competition here
KRKNF vs EQTL Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, EQTL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while EQTL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas EQTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EQTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is less volatile compared to EQTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check EQTL's competition here
KRKNF vs LBAS Comparison August 2025
KRKNF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKNF stands at 765.6M. In comparison, LBAS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKNF is priced at $2.49, while LBAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKNF currently has a P/E ratio of 41.67, whereas LBAS's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KRKNF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LBAS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKNF is more volatile compared to LBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKNF.Check LBAS's competition here