Koninklijke KPN N.V.
Koninklijke KPN N.V. (KPN.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KPN.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPN.AS | €4.85 | +1.66% | 18.5B | 23.09 | €0.21 | +3.61% |
| VERIZ.BR | €54.00 | +0.00% | 227B | 12.19 | €4.43 | N/A |
| DTEL.BR | €20.00 | +0.37% | 99.5B | 18.02 | €1.11 | N/A |
| ORA.PA | €17.89 | +1.22% | 47.6B | 89.45 | €0.20 | +4.19% |
| TFA.BR | €3.90 | +0.59% | 22.4B | 15.00 | €0.26 | N/A |
| IAM.PA | €9.20 | -1.08% | 8.1B | 12.96 | €0.71 | +2.95% |
| TIT.BR | €0.31 | +0.49% | 6.3B | -0.58 | -€0.53 | N/A |
| NOS.LS | €5.56 | +1.09% | 2.8B | 11.12 | €0.50 | +7.19% |
| TNET.BR | €21.28 | +0.38% | 2.3B | 11.89 | €1.79 | +4.70% |
| PROX.BR | €6.99 | -1.41% | 2.3B | 5.68 | €1.23 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
KPN.AS vs VERIZ.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, VERIZ.BR has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while VERIZ.BR trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VERIZ.BR's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VERIZ.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to VERIZ.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check VERIZ.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs DTEL.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, DTEL.BR has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while DTEL.BR trades at €20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas DTEL.BR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTEL.BR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to DTEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check DTEL.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs ORA.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ORA.PA has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ORA.PA trades at €17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ORA.PA's P/E ratio is 89.45. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ORA.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to ORA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ORA.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs TFA.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TFA.BR has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while TFA.BR trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TFA.BR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TFA.BR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to TFA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check TFA.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs IAM.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, IAM.PA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while IAM.PA trades at €9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas IAM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IAM.PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to IAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check IAM.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs TIT.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TIT.BR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while TIT.BR trades at €0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TIT.BR's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TIT.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to TIT.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check TIT.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs NOS.LS Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, NOS.LS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while NOS.LS trades at €5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas NOS.LS's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NOS.LS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to NOS.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check NOS.LS's competition here
KPN.AS vs TNET.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TNET.BR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while TNET.BR trades at €21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TNET.BR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TNET.BR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to TNET.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check TNET.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs PROX.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PROX.BR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while PROX.BR trades at €6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PROX.BR's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PROX.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to PROX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check PROX.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs VEON.AS Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, VEON.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while VEON.AS trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas VEON.AS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEON.AS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to VEON.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check VEON.AS's competition here
KPN.AS vs OBEL.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, OBEL.BR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while OBEL.BR trades at €20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas OBEL.BR's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OBEL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to OBEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check OBEL.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs TISN.BR Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TISN.BR has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while TISN.BR trades at €0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas TISN.BR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TISN.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to TISN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check TISN.BR's competition here
KPN.AS vs PHR.LS Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PHR.LS has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while PHR.LS trades at €0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PHR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to PHR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check PHR.LS's competition here
KPN.AS vs ALOSM.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ALOSM.PA has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ALOSM.PA trades at €15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ALOSM.PA's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALOSM.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to ALOSM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ALOSM.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs PAR.MC Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PAR.MC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while PAR.MC trades at €1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas PAR.MC's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAR.MC's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to PAR.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check PAR.MC's competition here
KPN.AS vs ALBUD.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ALBUD.PA has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ALBUD.PA trades at €3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ALBUD.PA's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALBUD.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to ALBUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ALBUD.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs LLN.MC Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, LLN.MC has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while LLN.MC trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas LLN.MC's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LLN.MC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to LLN.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check LLN.MC's competition here
KPN.AS vs ALLLN.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ALLLN.PA has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ALLLN.PA trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ALLLN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALLLN.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to ALLLN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ALLLN.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs ALBDM.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ALBDM.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ALBDM.PA trades at €5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ALBDM.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALBDM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to ALBDM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ALBDM.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs MLWEA.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, MLWEA.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while MLWEA.PA trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas MLWEA.PA's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLWEA.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to MLWEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check MLWEA.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs MLNEO.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, MLNEO.PA has a market cap of 194.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while MLNEO.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas MLNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLNEO.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to MLNEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check MLNEO.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs BUDBS.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, BUDBS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while BUDBS.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas BUDBS.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BUDBS.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is less volatile compared to BUDBS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check BUDBS.PA's competition here
KPN.AS vs ILD.PA Comparison April 2026
KPN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPN.AS stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ILD.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KPN.AS is priced at €4.85, while ILD.PA trades at €182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.09, whereas ILD.PA's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, KPN.AS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ILD.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPN.AS is more volatile compared to ILD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPN.AS.Check ILD.PA's competition here