K+S AG
K+S AG KPLUF Peers
See (KPLUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPLUF | $17.45 | +46.64% | 3.13B | -41.55 | -$0.42 | +4.34% |
| CBLUY | $10.68 | -4.56% | 53.50B | 5.90 | $1.81 | +13.38% |
| PHOJY | $22.09 | N/A | 17.52B | 3.99 | $5.53 | N/A |
| YARIY | $16.84 | +1.60% | 17.15B | 30.06 | $0.56 | +1.40% |
| YRAIF | $33.63 | +1.90% | 8.57B | 29.76 | $1.13 | +1.40% |
| BLONF | $0.00 | N/A | 2.79B | -0.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TSDOF | $25.18 | N/A | 1.50B | 31.87 | $0.79 | +3.60% |
| CBLUF | $0.28 | -20.00% | 1.29B | 9.33 | $0.03 | +10.39% |
| SNFRY | $7.73 | +35.85% | 1.09B | 7.43 | $1.04 | +4.06% |
| SNFRF | $0.15 | N/A | 1.05B | 7.44 | $0.02 | +4.22% |
Stock Comparison
KPLUF vs CBLUY Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, CBLUY has a market cap of 53.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while CBLUY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas CBLUY's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBLUY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to CBLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs PHOJY Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, PHOJY has a market cap of 17.52B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while PHOJY trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas PHOJY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PHOJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to PHOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs YARIY Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, YARIY has a market cap of 17.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while YARIY trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas YARIY's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YARIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to YARIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs YRAIF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, YRAIF has a market cap of 8.57B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while YRAIF trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas YRAIF's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YRAIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to YRAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs BLONF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, BLONF has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while BLONF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas BLONF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLONF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to BLONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs TSDOF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, TSDOF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while TSDOF trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas TSDOF's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSDOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to TSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs CBLUF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, CBLUF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while CBLUF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas CBLUF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBLUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to CBLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs SNFRY Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, SNFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while SNFRY trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas SNFRY's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNFRY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to SNFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs SNFRF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, SNFRF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while SNFRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas SNFRF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNFRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to SNFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs NUFMF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, NUFMF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while NUFMF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas NUFMF's P/E ratio is -268.00. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NUFMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to NUFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs BWEL Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, BWEL has a market cap of 519.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while BWEL trades at $518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas BWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BWEL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to BWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs MBCF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, MBCF has a market cap of 313.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while MBCF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas MBCF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MBCF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to MBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs DNKLY Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, DNKLY has a market cap of 102.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while DNKLY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas DNKLY's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNKLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to DNKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs EMSNF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, EMSNF has a market cap of 58.73M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while EMSNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas EMSNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMSNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to EMSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs PLHCF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, PLHCF has a market cap of 54.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while PLHCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas PLHCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLHCF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to PLHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs MGROF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, MGROF has a market cap of 39.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while MGROF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas MGROF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGROF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to MGROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs KNGW Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, KNGW has a market cap of 32.60M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while KNGW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas KNGW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KNGW's ROE of -8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to KNGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs EDNSF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, EDNSF has a market cap of 26.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while EDNSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas EDNSF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDNSF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to EDNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs VNPKF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, VNPKF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while VNPKF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas VNPKF's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VNPKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to VNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs HMIFF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, HMIFF has a market cap of 16.74M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while HMIFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas HMIFF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMIFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to HMIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs VVIVF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, VVIVF has a market cap of 9.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while VVIVF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas VVIVF's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VVIVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to VVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs LBTD Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, LBTD has a market cap of 7.83M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while LBTD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas LBTD's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LBTD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to LBTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs KRLTF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, KRLTF has a market cap of 6.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while KRLTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas KRLTF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRLTF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to KRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs ARLSF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, ARLSF has a market cap of 6.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while ARLSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas ARLSF's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARLSF's ROE of -20.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to ARLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs FTZZF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, FTZZF has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while FTZZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas FTZZF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTZZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to FTZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs APEOF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, APEOF has a market cap of 2.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while APEOF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas APEOF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APEOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to APEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs BEVVF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, BEVVF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while BEVVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas BEVVF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEVVF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to BEVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs ALGWF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, ALGWF has a market cap of 1.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while ALGWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas ALGWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALGWF's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to ALGWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs PTAM Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, PTAM has a market cap of 356700.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while PTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas PTAM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to PTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs EACTF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, EACTF has a market cap of 289178.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while EACTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas EACTF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EACTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to EACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs MAAFF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, MAAFF has a market cap of 75594.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while MAAFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas MAAFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAAFF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to MAAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs KWBT Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, KWBT has a market cap of 56477.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while KWBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas KWBT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KWBT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to KWBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs AGYP Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, AGYP has a market cap of 20037.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while AGYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas AGYP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGYP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to AGYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs IGNE Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, IGNE has a market cap of 15654.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while IGNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas IGNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IGNE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to IGNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs KGET Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, KGET has a market cap of 11859.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while KGET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas KGET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KGET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to KGET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs HFGVF Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, HFGVF has a market cap of 6019.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while HFGVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas HFGVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HFGVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to HFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs SLCO Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, SLCO has a market cap of 4704.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while SLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas SLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to SLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs BIONQ Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, BIONQ has a market cap of 4480.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while BIONQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas BIONQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIONQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to BIONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs HUMT Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, HUMT has a market cap of 3716.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while HUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas HUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUMT's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to HUMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs YUII Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, YUII has a market cap of 2025.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while YUII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas YUII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YUII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to YUII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs ITRO Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, ITRO has a market cap of 1782.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while ITRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas ITRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to ITRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs NOEC Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, NOEC has a market cap of 1701.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while NOEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas NOEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to NOEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs PHOS Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, PHOS has a market cap of 841.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while PHOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas PHOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PHOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to PHOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs GREN Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, GREN has a market cap of 443.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while GREN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas GREN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GREN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is less volatile compared to GREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.
KPLUF vs USBC Comparison
KPLUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPLUF stands at 3.13B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 41.00. Regarding current trading prices, KPLUF is priced at $17.45, while USBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPLUF currently has a P/E ratio of -41.55, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KPLUF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KPLUF is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPLUF.