Natixis S.A.
Natixis S.A. KN.PA Peers
See (KN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KN.PA | $4.00 | N/A | N/A | 25.01 | $0.16 | N/A |
| BNP.PA | $77.64 | +0.64% | 87.70B | 8.17 | $9.50 | +12.09% |
| ACA.PA | $17.65 | +1.47% | 53.11B | 8.65 | $2.04 | +5.95% |
| KBC.BR | $88.68 | +1.37% | 35.17B | 10.48 | $8.46 | +5.13% |
| GLE.PA | $49.24 | +0.61% | 34.68B | 8.90 | $5.53 | +1.83% |
| XBBDC.MC | $2.36 | -4.84% | 23.62B | 9.83 | $0.24 | +3.91% |
| A5G.IR | $6.71 | +3.23% | 14.34B | 7.29 | $0.92 | +5.51% |
| BIRG.IR | $11.85 | +2.69% | 11.57B | 8.35 | $1.42 | +5.32% |
| BCP.LS | $0.64 | +1.37% | 9.60B | 10.59 | $0.06 | +2.68% |
| VLK.AS | $57.80 | +0.17% | 2.45B | 18.65 | $3.10 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
KN.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 87.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while BNP.PA trades at $77.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 53.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while ACA.PA trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 35.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while KBC.BR trades at $88.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while GLE.PA trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 23.62B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while XBBDC.MC trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while A5G.IR trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.57B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while BIRG.IR trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while BCP.LS trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while VLK.AS trades at $57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while IL0A.IR trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 940.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while PTSB.IR trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 699.06M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while MLCFM.PA trades at $1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 568.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CAF.PA trades at $71.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 364.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRBP2.PA trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CNF.PA trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 173.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CIV.PA trades at $77.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 146.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while BNB.BR trades at $367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 123.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CMO.PA trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 122.95M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRAV.PA trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 122.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CAT31.PA trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 104.37M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRLA.PA trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 104.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CCN.PA trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 94.93M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRSU.PA trades at $151.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 92.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRTO.PA trades at $90.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 71.70M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRLO.PA trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 64.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while CRAP.PA trades at $93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.
KN.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison
KN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KN.PA stands at N/A. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KN.PA is priced at $4.00, while MLGRC.PA trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KN.PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KN.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KN.PA.