Komatsu Ltd.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 153.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CAT trades at $320.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 128.93B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while DE trades at $475.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 62.60B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while DTRUY trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 55.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while VOLVF trades at $27.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 55.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while VLVLY trades at $26.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 52.82B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while VOLAF trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 46.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while PCAR trades at $88.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 31.49B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while DTGHF trades at $40.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 27.57B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KMTUF trades at $29.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 26.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while EPIAF trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 22.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KIGRY trades at $10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 20.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 18.33B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while OUKPY trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while TRATF trades at $33.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 15.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CNH trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.40B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CNHI trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KUBTF trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ZLIOY trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while SHKLY trades at $125.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while AGCO trades at $94.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while OSK trades at $88.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KNCRY trades at $13.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KNNGF trades at $35.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KNCRF trades at $57.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while KUBTY trades at $58.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while TEX trades at $39.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while SNYYF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ALG trades at $172.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while REVG trades at $35.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while WKRCF trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while LNN trades at $134.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while PLFRF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while LONKF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 872.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ASTE trades at $38.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 57.79. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 717.49M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while HY trades at $40.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 445.13M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while AGGZF trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 436.06M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while TWI trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -29.76. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 435.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CMCO trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 47.53. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 340.82M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while WNC trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 315.79M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while SHYF trades at $9.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 294.88M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while MTW trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 176.26M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while GENC trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.25M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 144.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while TGHLF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while MNTX trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while LEV trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 34.74M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 31.16M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while XOS trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XOS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 28.18M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 19.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while HYFM trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while NKLA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 14.03M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CLEV trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.20M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ZEV trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +86.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 8.90M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ARTW trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CUBXF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 5.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while UGRO trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CEAD trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while GWPD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.83M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while AMMX trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 692997.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while AIFM trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 538082.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460599.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while GRSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 287797.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CYLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42143.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while IDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 32968.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while ZEVY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11769.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 11141.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while CEADW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 3847.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while GRNH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while OSRS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, GRAZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.

KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 27.34B. In comparison, NAV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $29.63, while NAV trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 8.95, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.