Komatsu Ltd.
Komatsu Ltd. KMTUY Peers
See (KMTUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTUY | $32.50 | -1.52% | 30.2B | 10.01 | $3.27 | N/A |
| DTRUY | $24.09 | +1.47% | 72.1B | 10.98 | $2.12 | +4.57% |
| VOLVF | $29.85 | +1.25% | 59.3B | 12.30 | $2.37 | +6.47% |
| VLVLY | $28.45 | +0.98% | 57B | 11.83 | $2.37 | +6.59% |
| VOLAF | $27.95 | -6.15% | 56.8B | 11.65 | $2.40 | +6.75% |
| DTGHF | $47.69 | +9.16% | 35.2B | 11.05 | $4.19 | +4.27% |
| KMTUF | $32.21 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 10.05 | $3.27 | +3.92% |
| EPIAF | $22.51 | +2.88% | 25.8B | 29.04 | $0.77 | +0.89% |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | +0.00% | 25.3B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +1.61% |
| OUKPY | $6.54 | +4.42% | 21.1B | 18.79 | $0.34 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
KMTUY vs DTRUY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while DTRUY trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VOLVF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while VOLVF trades at $29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VLVLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while VLVLY trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VOLAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while VOLAF trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs DTGHF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while DTGHF trades at $47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KMTUF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KMTUF trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPIAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while EPIAF trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPOKY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OUKPY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while OUKPY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPIPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs TRATF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while TRATF trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KUBTF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KUBTF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OUKPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while OUKPF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZLIOY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while ZLIOY trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZLIOF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while ZLIOF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KIGRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KIGRY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SHKLF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while SHKLF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNNGF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KNNGF trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SHKLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while SHKLY trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs HTCMY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while HTCMY trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNCRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KNCRY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs HTCMF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNCRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KNCRF trades at $78.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SNYYF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while SNYYF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KUBTY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while KUBTY trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs WKRCF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while WKRCF trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FIRRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLFRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while PLFRF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs LKHLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while LKHLY trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLFRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs LONKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while LONKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AGGZF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 557.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while AGGZF trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -19.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FIRRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs QGLHF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs TGHLF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while TGHLF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AUSTF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while AUSTF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLPKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while PLPKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs BIIAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FBRKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while FBRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CLEV Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while CLEV trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -180.80. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CUBXF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while CUBXF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AMMX Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while AMMX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AIFM Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 693K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while AIFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs WWTIF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 541.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRSO Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CYLC Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 164.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CLGPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while CLGPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GWPD Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OSRS Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs BWOWF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZEVY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 659. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRNH Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRAZ Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 30.2B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $32.50, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.01, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.