Komatsu Ltd.
Komatsu Ltd. KMTUY Peers
See (KMTUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTUY | $30.32 | +0.08% | 28B | 9.13 | $3.32 | N/A |
| DTRUY | $21.86 | +0.41% | 67.7B | 10.56 | $2.07 | +4.85% |
| VOLAF | $29.78 | +2.73% | 60.3B | 12.46 | $2.39 | +6.34% |
| VOLVF | $28.41 | -4.08% | 57.8B | 11.89 | $2.39 | +6.64% |
| VLVLY | $27.73 | -0.13% | 56B | 11.60 | $2.39 | +6.66% |
| DTGHF | $43.44 | -1.55% | 33.1B | 10.49 | $4.14 | +4.55% |
| KMTUF | $32.34 | +6.03% | 29.8B | 9.74 | $3.32 | +3.98% |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | N/A | 25.3B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +0.81% |
| KIGRY | $11.59 | -1.15% | 24.3B | 26.33 | $0.44 | +3.29% |
| EPIAF | $18.74 | -19.58% | 21.8B | 24.03 | $0.78 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
KMTUY vs DTRUY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while DTRUY trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VOLAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while VOLAF trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VOLVF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while VOLVF trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs VLVLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while VLVLY trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs DTGHF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while DTGHF trades at $43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KMTUF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KMTUF trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPOKY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KIGRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KIGRY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPIAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while EPIAF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OUKPY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while OUKPY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs EPIPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while EPIPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs TRATF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while TRATF trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KUBTF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KUBTF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZLIOY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while ZLIOY trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OUKPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZLIOF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while ZLIOF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SHKLF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNCRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KNCRY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNNGF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KNNGF trades at $45.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs HTCMY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while HTCMY trades at $54.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs HTCMF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KNCRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KNCRF trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs KUBTY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while KUBTY trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SNYYF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while SNYYF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs WKRCF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while WKRCF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FIRRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLFRF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while PLFRF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs LKHLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLFRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs LONKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while LONKF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AGGZF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 526.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while AGGZF trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FIRRY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GWPD Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while GWPD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs QGLHF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while QGLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AUSTF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs TGHLF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while TGHLF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs SHKLY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while SHKLY trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs PLPKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs BIIAF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs FBRKF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while FBRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CLGPF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while CLGPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CLEV Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while CLEV trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CUBXF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while CUBXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY and CUBXF have similar daily volatility (3.77).
KMTUY vs AMMX Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while AMMX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRSO Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 921.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs WWTIF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 538.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs CYLC Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 189.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs OSRS Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 97.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs BWOWF Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is less volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs ZEVY Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs AIFM Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while AIFM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRNH Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.
KMTUY vs GRAZ Comparison
KMTUY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUY stands at 28B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUY is priced at $30.32, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUY is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUY.