Komatsu Ltd.
Komatsu Ltd. (KMTUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMTUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTUF | $34.25 | +6.91% | 29.6B | 10.06 | $3.21 | +4.01% |
| DTRUY | $23.87 | +0.72% | 74.3B | 13.35 | $1.78 | +4.45% |
| VLVLY | $30.87 | +0.19% | 62.7B | 15.83 | $1.95 | +6.00% |
| VOLVF | $30.39 | -1.84% | 61.8B | 15.58 | $1.95 | +6.04% |
| VOLAF | $28.00 | +0.00% | 56.9B | 14.36 | $1.95 | +6.74% |
| DTGHF | $47.26 | -3.21% | 35.6B | 13.31 | $3.55 | +4.56% |
| KMTUY | $34.06 | +0.41% | 31.4B | 10.61 | $3.21 | +3.14% |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | +0.00% | 25.3B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +1.61% |
| EPIAF | $21.42 | +0.51% | 24.4B | 27.46 | $0.78 | +0.94% |
| EPIPF | $17.83 | +0.00% | 21.6B | 23.16 | $0.77 | +2.23% |
Stock Comparison
KMTUF vs DTRUY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while DTRUY trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check DTRUY's competition here
KMTUF vs VLVLY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while VLVLY trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VLVLY's competition here
KMTUF vs VOLVF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while VOLVF trades at $30.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VOLVF's competition here
KMTUF vs VOLAF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while VOLAF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check VOLAF's competition here
KMTUF vs DTGHF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while DTGHF trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check DTGHF's competition here
KMTUF vs KMTUY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KMTUY trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KMTUY's competition here
KMTUF vs EPOKY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPOKY's competition here
KMTUF vs EPIAF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while EPIAF trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPIAF's competition here
KMTUF vs EPIPF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while EPIPF trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check EPIPF's competition here
KMTUF vs OUKPY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while OUKPY trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OUKPY's competition here
KMTUF vs TRATF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while TRATF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check TRATF's competition here
KMTUF vs KUBTF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KUBTF trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KUBTF's competition here
KMTUF vs KIGRY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KIGRY trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KIGRY's competition here
KMTUF vs OUKPF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while OUKPF trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OUKPF's competition here
KMTUF vs ZLIOF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while ZLIOF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZLIOF's competition here
KMTUF vs ZLIOY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while ZLIOY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZLIOY's competition here
KMTUF vs SHKLY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while SHKLY trades at $147.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SHKLY's competition here
KMTUF vs KNCRF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KNCRF trades at $87.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNCRF's competition here
KMTUF vs KNNGF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KNNGF trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNNGF's competition here
KMTUF vs KNCRY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KNCRY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KNCRY's competition here
KMTUF vs SHKLF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while SHKLF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SHKLF's competition here
KMTUF vs HTCMY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while HTCMY trades at $61.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check HTCMY's competition here
KMTUF vs HTCMF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check HTCMF's competition here
KMTUF vs SNYYF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while SNYYF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check SNYYF's competition here
KMTUF vs KUBTY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while KUBTY trades at $59.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check KUBTY's competition here
KMTUF vs WKRCF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while WKRCF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check WKRCF's competition here
KMTUF vs FIRRF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while FIRRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FIRRF's competition here
KMTUF vs LONKF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while LONKF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check LONKF's competition here
KMTUF vs LKHLY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while LKHLY trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check LKHLY's competition here
KMTUF vs PLFRF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while PLFRF trades at $43.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLFRF's competition here
KMTUF vs FIRRY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FIRRY's competition here
KMTUF vs PLFRY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLFRY's competition here
KMTUF vs AGGZF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 568.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while AGGZF trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -116.23. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AGGZF's competition here
KMTUF vs QGLHF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while QGLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check QGLHF's competition here
KMTUF vs TGHLF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while TGHLF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check TGHLF's competition here
KMTUF vs AUSTF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while AUSTF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AUSTF's competition here
KMTUF vs BIIAF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check BIIAF's competition here
KMTUF vs PLPKF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while PLPKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check PLPKF's competition here
KMTUF vs FBRKF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while FBRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check FBRKF's competition here
KMTUF vs WWTIF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while WWTIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check WWTIF's competition here
KMTUF vs CLEV Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while CLEV trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -93.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CLEV's competition here
KMTUF vs CLGPF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while CLGPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of +56.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CLGPF's competition here
KMTUF vs CUBXF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while CUBXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CUBXF's competition here
KMTUF vs GWPD Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GWPD's competition here
KMTUF vs AMMX Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while AMMX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AMMX's competition here
KMTUF vs GRSO Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRSO's competition here
KMTUF vs CYLC Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 164.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check CYLC's competition here
KMTUF vs GRNH Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRNH's competition here
KMTUF vs AIFM Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while AIFM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check AIFM's competition here
KMTUF vs OSRS Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check OSRS's competition here
KMTUF vs BWOWF Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 843. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check BWOWF's competition here
KMTUF vs ZEVY Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 659. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check ZEVY's competition here
KMTUF vs GRAZ Comparison August 2025
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $34.25, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.06, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is more volatile compared to GRAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.Check GRAZ's competition here