Komatsu Ltd.
Komatsu Ltd. KMTUF Peers
See (KMTUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTUF | $32.34 | +6.03% | 29.8B | 9.74 | $3.32 | +3.98% |
| DTRUY | $21.86 | +0.41% | 67.7B | 10.56 | $2.07 | +4.85% |
| VOLAF | $29.78 | +2.73% | 60.3B | 12.46 | $2.39 | +6.34% |
| VOLVF | $28.41 | -4.08% | 57.8B | 11.89 | $2.39 | +6.64% |
| VLVLY | $27.73 | -0.13% | 56B | 11.60 | $2.39 | +6.66% |
| DTGHF | $43.44 | -1.55% | 33.1B | 10.49 | $4.14 | +4.55% |
| KMTUY | $30.32 | +0.08% | 28B | 9.13 | $3.32 | N/A |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | N/A | 25.3B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +0.81% |
| KIGRY | $11.59 | -1.15% | 24.3B | 26.33 | $0.44 | +3.29% |
| EPIAF | $18.74 | -19.58% | 21.8B | 24.03 | $0.78 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
KMTUF vs DTRUY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while DTRUY trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs VOLAF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while VOLAF trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and VOLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs VOLVF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while VOLVF trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs VLVLY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while VLVLY trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs DTGHF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while DTGHF trades at $43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and DTGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs KMTUY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KMTUY trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs EPOKY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs KIGRY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KIGRY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs EPIAF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while EPIAF trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs OUKPY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while OUKPY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs EPIPF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while EPIPF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs TRATF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while TRATF trades at $33.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs KUBTF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KUBTF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs ZLIOY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while ZLIOY trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and ZLIOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs OUKPF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs ZLIOF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while ZLIOF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and ZLIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs SHKLF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and SHKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs KNCRY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KNCRY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and KNCRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs KNNGF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KNNGF trades at $45.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and KNNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs HTCMY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while HTCMY trades at $54.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and HTCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs HTCMF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and HTCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs KNCRF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KNCRF trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and KNCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs KUBTY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while KUBTY trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs SNYYF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while SNYYF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and SNYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs WKRCF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while WKRCF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and WKRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs FIRRF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs PLFRF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while PLFRF trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs LKHLY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs PLFRY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and PLFRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs LONKF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while LONKF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and LONKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs AGGZF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 526.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while AGGZF trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs FIRRY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and FIRRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs GWPD Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while GWPD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs QGLHF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while QGLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and QGLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs AUSTF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and AUSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs TGHLF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while TGHLF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and TGHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs SHKLY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while SHKLY trades at $124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and SHKLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs PLPKF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs BIIAF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and BIIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs FBRKF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while FBRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and FBRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs CLGPF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while CLGPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs CLEV Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while CLEV trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs CUBXF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while CUBXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs AMMX Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while AMMX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and AMMX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs GRSO Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 921.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and GRSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs WWTIF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 538.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and WWTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs CYLC Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CYLC has a market cap of 189.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while CYLC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CYLC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYLC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to CYLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs OSRS Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 97.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSRS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs BWOWF Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF is less volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMTUF.
KMTUF vs ZEVY Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and ZEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs AIFM Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while AIFM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and AIFM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs GRNH Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 385. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and GRNH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMTUF vs GRAZ Comparison
KMTUF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMTUF stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GRAZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMTUF is priced at $32.34, while GRAZ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMTUF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GRAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMTUF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRAZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMTUF and GRAZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).