Kingmaker Footwear Holdings Limited
Kingmaker Footwear Holdings Limited (KMSWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMSWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMSWF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 33.1M | -5.00 | -$0.01 | +23.10% |
| ADDYY | $96.49 | +1.29% | 34.5B | 25.09 | $3.85 | +1.17% |
| ADDDF | $190.00 | -2.46% | 33.9B | 28.23 | $6.73 | +1.18% |
| ASCCF | $24.53 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 37.74 | $0.65 | +0.60% |
| ASCCY | $23.79 | +0.51% | 16.9B | 36.36 | $0.65 | +0.45% |
| BCUCF | $118.00 | +0.00% | 8B | 58.13 | $2.03 | +0.90% |
| PMMAF | $21.95 | +2.62% | 3.2B | 14.54 | $1.51 | +3.15% |
| HUGPF | $46.36 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 13.10 | $3.54 | +3.37% |
| PUMSY | $2.06 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 13.67 | $0.15 | +3.36% |
| SMSEY | $10.15 | +0.20% | 2.8B | 8.53 | $1.19 | +5.29% |
Stock Comparison
KMSWF vs ADDYY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while ADDYY trades at $96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check ADDYY's competition here
KMSWF vs ADDDF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while ADDDF trades at $190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check ADDDF's competition here
KMSWF vs ASCCF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while ASCCF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to ASCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check ASCCF's competition here
KMSWF vs ASCCY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while ASCCY trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check ASCCY's competition here
KMSWF vs BCUCF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while BCUCF trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check BCUCF's competition here
KMSWF vs PMMAF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, PMMAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while PMMAF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PMMAF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PMMAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to PMMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check PMMAF's competition here
KMSWF vs HUGPF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while HUGPF trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to HUGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check HUGPF's competition here
KMSWF vs PUMSY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while PUMSY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check PUMSY's competition here
KMSWF vs SMSEY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, SMSEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while SMSEY trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SMSEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMSEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to SMSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check SMSEY's competition here
KMSWF vs SMSOF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while SMSOF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to SMSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check SMSOF's competition here
KMSWF vs YUEIF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while YUEIF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to YUEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check YUEIF's competition here
KMSWF vs YUEIY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while YUEIY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to YUEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check YUEIY's competition here
KMSWF vs TSIOF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, TSIOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while TSIOF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TSIOF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to TSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check TSIOF's competition here
KMSWF vs TODGF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while TODGF trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to TODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check TODGF's competition here
KMSWF vs SLNLY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while SLNLY trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to SLNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check SLNLY's competition here
KMSWF vs FXWZF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to FXWZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check FXWZF's competition here
KMSWF vs DRMTY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while DRMTY trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 213.60. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to DRMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check DRMTY's competition here
KMSWF vs DOCMF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while DOCMF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to DOCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check DOCMF's competition here
KMSWF vs GXSBY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while GXSBY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to GXSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check GXSBY's competition here
KMSWF vs GXSBF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while GXSBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to GXSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check GXSBF's competition here
KMSWF vs TDPAY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to TDPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check TDPAY's competition here
KMSWF vs MCRAB Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while MCRAB trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to MCRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check MCRAB's competition here
KMSWF vs MCRAA Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, MCRAA has a market cap of 112.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while MCRAA trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas MCRAA's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCRAA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to MCRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check MCRAA's competition here
KMSWF vs DPNEY Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while DPNEY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check DPNEY's competition here
KMSWF vs DPNEF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to DPNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check DPNEF's competition here
KMSWF vs BSHI Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while BSHI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to BSHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check BSHI's competition here
KMSWF vs TIEMF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to TIEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check TIEMF's competition here
KMSWF vs GVSI Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while GVSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check GVSI's competition here
KMSWF vs CHSH Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while CHSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHSH's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to CHSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check CHSH's competition here
KMSWF vs RBNW Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 939.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while RBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to RBNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check RBNW's competition here
KMSWF vs SAML Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 342K. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while SAML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAML's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to SAML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check SAML's competition here
KMSWF vs ATYM Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while ATYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check ATYM's competition here
KMSWF vs PXFG Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 81.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while PXFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to PXFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check PXFG's competition here
KMSWF vs QING Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while QING trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to QING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check QING's competition here
KMSWF vs LESAF Comparison August 2025
KMSWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMSWF stands at 33.1M. In comparison, LESAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMSWF is priced at $0.05, while LESAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMSWF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.00, whereas LESAF's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, KMSWF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LESAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSWF is more volatile compared to LESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSWF.Check LESAF's competition here