K.M. Sugar Mills Limited

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹807.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.NS has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BALRAMCHIN.NS trades at ₹489.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BALRAMCHIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BALRAMCHIN.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.BO has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BALRAMCHIN.BO trades at ₹488.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BALRAMCHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BALRAMCHIN.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRIVENI.BO has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TRIVENI.BO trades at ₹389.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TRIVENI.BO's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIVENI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TRIVENI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TRIVENI.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRIVENI.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TRIVENI.NS trades at ₹388.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TRIVENI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIVENI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TRIVENI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TRIVENI.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RENUKA.NS has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RENUKA.NS trades at ₹28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RENUKA.NS's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RENUKA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RENUKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RENUKA.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RENUKA.BO has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RENUKA.BO trades at ₹28.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RENUKA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RENUKA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RENUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RENUKA.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BANARISUG.BO has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BANARISUG.BO trades at ₹3,763.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BANARISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BANARISUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to BANARISUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BANARISUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BANARISUG.NS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BANARISUG.NS trades at ₹3,691.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BANARISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BANARISUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to BANARISUG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BANARISUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DALMIASUG.NS trades at ₹370.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DALMIASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DALMIASUG.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DALMIASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DALMIASUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DALMIASUG.BO trades at ₹369.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DALMIASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DALMIASUG.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DALMIASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DALMIASUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BAJAJHIND.NS trades at ₹17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BAJAJHIND.NS's P/E ratio is -48.80. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAJAJHIND.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BAJAJHIND.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BAJAJHIND.BO trades at ₹17.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BAJAJHIND.BO's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAJAJHIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BAJAJHIND.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while UTTAMSUGAR.NS trades at ₹247.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check UTTAMSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while UTTAMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹247.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check UTTAMSUGAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while AVADHSUGAR.BO trades at ₹468.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas AVADHSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check AVADHSUGAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while AVADHSUGAR.NS trades at ₹468.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas AVADHSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check AVADHSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DHAMPURSUG.NS trades at ₹138.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DHAMPURSUG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DHAMPURSUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DHAMPURSUG.BO trades at ₹137.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DHAMPURSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DHAMPURSUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LOTUSCHO.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while LOTUSCHO.BO trades at ₹662.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas LOTUSCHO.BO's P/E ratio is 140.91. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTUSCHO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSCHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check LOTUSCHO.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DWARKESH.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DWARKESH.BO trades at ₹45.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DWARKESH.BO's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DWARKESH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DWARKESH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DWARKESH.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DWARKESH.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DWARKESH.NS trades at ₹45.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DWARKESH.NS's P/E ratio is 42.16. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DWARKESH.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DWARKESH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DWARKESH.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VADILENT.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while VADILENT.BO trades at ₹9,575.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas VADILENT.BO's P/E ratio is 138.89. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VADILENT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to VADILENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check VADILENT.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NITTAGELA.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while NITTAGELA.BO trades at ₹794.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas NITTAGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NITTAGELA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to NITTAGELA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check NITTAGELA.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAGADSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MAGADSUGAR.NS trades at ₹493.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MAGADSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MAGADSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAGADSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MAGADSUGAR.BO trades at ₹491.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MAGADSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAGADSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MAGADSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MAGADSUGAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while UGARSUGAR.BO trades at ₹39.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas UGARSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGARSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check UGARSUGAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while UGARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹39.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas UGARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check UGARSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MAWANASUG.NS trades at ₹92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MAWANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAWANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MAWANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MAWANASUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MAWANASUG.BO trades at ₹92.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MAWANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAWANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MAWANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MAWANASUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANNAPURNA.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while ANNAPURNA.NS trades at ₹195.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas ANNAPURNA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANNAPURNA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to ANNAPURNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check ANNAPURNA.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DAVANGERE.BO trades at ₹3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DAVANGERE.BO's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAVANGERE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to DAVANGERE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DAVANGERE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DAVANGERE.NS trades at ₹3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DAVANGERE.NS's P/E ratio is 74.80. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAVANGERE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to DAVANGERE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DAVANGERE.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DCMSRIND.BO trades at ₹36.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DCMSRIND.BO's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCMSRIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DCMSRIND.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DCMSRIND.NS trades at ₹36.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DCMSRIND.NS's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCMSRIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DCMSRIND.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KCPSUGIND.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KCPSUGIND.NS trades at ₹24.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KCPSUGIND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to KCPSUGIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KCPSUGIND.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KCPSUGIND.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KCPSUGIND.BO trades at ₹24.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KCPSUGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.78. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to KCPSUGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KCPSUGIND.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHEETAL.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SHEETAL.NS trades at ₹237.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SHEETAL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHEETAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SHEETAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SHEETAL.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TIERRA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TIERRA.BO trades at ₹38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TIERRA.BO's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIERRA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TIERRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TIERRA.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while PONNIERODE.BO trades at ₹280.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas PONNIERODE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PONNIERODE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to PONNIERODE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check PONNIERODE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while PONNIERODE.NS trades at ₹280.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas PONNIERODE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PONNIERODE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to PONNIERODE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check PONNIERODE.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹25.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to KMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KMSUGAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHAWGELTIN.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SHAWGELTIN.BO trades at ₹349.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SHAWGELTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SHAWGELTIN.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IWP.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while IWP.BO trades at ₹31.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas IWP.BO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IWP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to IWP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check IWP.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GOYALSALT.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while GOYALSALT.NS trades at ₹112.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas GOYALSALT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOYALSALT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to GOYALSALT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check GOYALSALT.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KOTARISUG.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KOTARISUG.NS trades at ₹23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KOTARISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOTARISUG.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to KOTARISUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KOTARISUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RANASUG.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RANASUG.BO trades at ₹12.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RANASUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RANASUG.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RANASUG.NS trades at ₹12.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RANASUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAKHTISUG.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SAKHTISUG.BO trades at ₹14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SAKHTISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAKHTISUG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SAKHTISUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SAKHTISUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAKHTISUG.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SAKHTISUG.NS trades at ₹14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SAKHTISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAKHTISUG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SAKHTISUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SAKHTISUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AJANTSOY.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while AJANTSOY.BO trades at ₹20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas AJANTSOY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AJANTSOY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to AJANTSOY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check AJANTSOY.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MLKFOOD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MLKFOOD.BO trades at ₹62.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MLKFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -18.84. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLKFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MLKFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MLKFOOD.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BAMBINO.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while BAMBINO.BO trades at ₹190.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas BAMBINO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BAMBINO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to BAMBINO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check BAMBINO.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAMPRE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SAMPRE.BO trades at ₹17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SAMPRE.BO's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAMPRE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SAMPRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SAMPRE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHRIGANG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SHRIGANG.BO trades at ₹79.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SHRIGANG.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHRIGANG.BO's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIGANG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SHRIGANG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TIRUSTA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TIRUSTA.BO trades at ₹129.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TIRUSTA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIRUSTA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TIRUSTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TIRUSTA.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OVOBELE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while OVOBELE.BO trades at ₹116.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas OVOBELE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVOBELE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to OVOBELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check OVOBELE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while VISHWARAJ.BO trades at ₹4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas VISHWARAJ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VISHWARAJ.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check VISHWARAJ.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while VISHWARAJ.NS trades at ₹4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas VISHWARAJ.NS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VISHWARAJ.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check VISHWARAJ.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GAYATRIBI.BO has a market cap of 969.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while GAYATRIBI.BO trades at ₹14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas GAYATRIBI.BO's P/E ratio is -133.91. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAYATRIBI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to GAYATRIBI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check GAYATRIBI.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SSFL.NS has a market cap of 946.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SSFL.NS trades at ₹110.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SSFL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSFL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SSFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SSFL.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RAJSREESUG.BO has a market cap of 929.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RAJSREESUG.BO trades at ₹28.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RAJSREESUG.BO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAJSREESUG.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RAJSREESUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RAJSREESUG.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RAJSREESUG.NS has a market cap of 915.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while RAJSREESUG.NS trades at ₹27.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas RAJSREESUG.NS's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAJSREESUG.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to RAJSREESUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check RAJSREESUG.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KORE.BO has a market cap of 886.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KORE.BO trades at ₹34.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KORE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KORE.BO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to KORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KORE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VASUPRADA.BO has a market cap of 782.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while VASUPRADA.BO trades at ₹94.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas VASUPRADA.BO's P/E ratio is 363.46. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VASUPRADA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to VASUPRADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check VASUPRADA.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HFIL.BO has a market cap of 689.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while HFIL.BO trades at ₹8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas HFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HFIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to HFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check HFIL.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NAPL.BO has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while NAPL.BO trades at ₹127.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas NAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 259.59. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAPL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to NAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check NAPL.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ITALIANE.NS has a market cap of 551.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while ITALIANE.NS trades at ₹37.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas ITALIANE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITALIANE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to ITALIANE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check ITALIANE.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KFBL.BO has a market cap of 544.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while KFBL.BO trades at ₹36.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas KFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KFBL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to KFBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check KFBL.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DILIGENT.BO has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DILIGENT.BO trades at ₹2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DILIGENT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DILIGENT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DILIGENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DILIGENT.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UNIVSTAR.BO has a market cap of 531.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while UNIVSTAR.BO trades at ₹126.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas UNIVSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIVSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check UNIVSTAR.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AMBOAGRI.BO has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while AMBOAGRI.BO trades at ₹23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas AMBOAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMBOAGRI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to AMBOAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check AMBOAGRI.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FLEXFO.BO has a market cap of 455.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while FLEXFO.BO trades at ₹36.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas FLEXFO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLEXFO.BO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to FLEXFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check FLEXFO.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANJANIFOODS.BO has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while ANJANIFOODS.BO trades at ₹14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas ANJANIFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 97.13. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check ANJANIFOODS.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRUDMOULI.NS has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while PRUDMOULI.NS trades at ₹12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas PRUDMOULI.NS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRUDMOULI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDMOULI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check PRUDMOULI.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.BO has a market cap of 302.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SIMBHALS.BO trades at ₹7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SIMBHALS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIMBHALS.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SIMBHALS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SIMBHALS.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.NS has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SIMBHALS.NS trades at ₹7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SIMBHALS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIMBHALS.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to SIMBHALS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SIMBHALS.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DHARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while DHARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas DHARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DHARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to DHARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check DHARSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TAPIFRUIT.NS has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TAPIFRUIT.NS trades at ₹58.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TAPIFRUIT.NS's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAPIFRUIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TAPIFRUIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TAPIFRUIT.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SONALIS.BO has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SONALIS.BO trades at ₹46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SONALIS.BO's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SONALIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to SONALIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SONALIS.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRIMAIN.BO has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while PRIMAIN.BO trades at ₹17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas PRIMAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRIMAIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check PRIMAIN.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CHOTHANI.BO has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while CHOTHANI.BO trades at ₹11.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas CHOTHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHOTHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to CHOTHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check CHOTHANI.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TARAI.BO has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TARAI.BO trades at ₹6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TARAI.BO's P/E ratio is -52.31. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TARAI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to TARAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TARAI.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHAHFOOD.BO has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SHAHFOOD.BO trades at ₹162.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SHAHFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 148.67. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHAHFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAHFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SHAHFOOD.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CJGEL.BO has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while CJGEL.BO trades at ₹17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas CJGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CJGEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to CJGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check CJGEL.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, THIRUSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while THIRUSUGAR.NS trades at ₹6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas THIRUSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check THIRUSUGAR.NS's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRANSFD.BO has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TRANSFD.BO trades at ₹420.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TRANSFD.BO's P/E ratio is -166.01. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRANSFD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSFD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TRANSFD.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SUNRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while SUNRETAIL.BO trades at ₹0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas SUNRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUNRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is more volatile compared to SUNRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check SUNRETAIL.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LONTE.BO has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while LONTE.BO trades at ₹14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas LONTE.BO's P/E ratio is -18.76. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LONTE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to LONTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check LONTE.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRICOMFRU.BO has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while TRICOMFRU.BO trades at ₹1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas TRICOMFRU.BO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRICOMFRU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to TRICOMFRU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check TRICOMFRU.BO's competition here

KMSUGAR.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KMSUGAR.NS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MADHURIND.BO has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMSUGAR.NS is priced at ₹25.92, while MADHURIND.BO trades at ₹7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KMSUGAR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 4.32, whereas MADHURIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KMSUGAR.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MADHURIND.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMSUGAR.NS is less volatile compared to MADHURIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMSUGAR.NS.Check MADHURIND.BO's competition here