K.C.P. Sugar and Industries Corporation Limited (KCPSUGIND.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KCPSUGIND.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCPSUGIND.BO | ₹22.17 | +0.18% | 2.5B | 22.39 | ₹0.99 | +0.45% |
| BALRAMCHIN.NS | ₹532.00 | -0.89% | 107.4B | 20.03 | ₹26.56 | +0.66% |
| BALRAMCHIN.BO | ₹531.75 | -0.94% | 107.4B | 29.71 | ₹17.90 | +0.66% |
| TRIVENI.BO | ₹409.00 | -2.25% | 89.6B | 32.26 | ₹12.68 | +0.98% |
| TRIVENI.NS | ₹409.00 | -2.37% | 89.5B | 21.66 | ₹18.88 | +0.98% |
| BANARISUG.BO | ₹3,420.00 | -1.44% | 43.2B | 29.00 | ₹117.95 | +0.37% |
| BANARISUG.NS | ₹3,390.00 | -2.23% | 42.5B | 28.74 | ₹117.95 | +0.37% |
| DALMIASUG.BO | ₹324.00 | -1.05% | 26.3B | 13.74 | ₹23.58 | +1.85% |
| DALMIASUG.NS | ₹323.60 | -1.39% | 26.2B | 9.63 | ₹33.59 | +1.85% |
| BAJAJHIND.BO | ₹18.15 | -3.51% | 24.7B | 95.53 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BALRAMCHIN.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.NS has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BALRAMCHIN.NS trades at ₹532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BALRAMCHIN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BALRAMCHIN.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BALRAMCHIN.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.BO has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BALRAMCHIN.BO trades at ₹531.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BALRAMCHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BALRAMCHIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TRIVENI.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRIVENI.BO has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TRIVENI.BO trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TRIVENI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIVENI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to TRIVENI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TRIVENI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TRIVENI.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRIVENI.NS has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TRIVENI.NS trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TRIVENI.NS's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIVENI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to TRIVENI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TRIVENI.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BANARISUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BANARISUG.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BANARISUG.BO trades at ₹3,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BANARISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BANARISUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BANARISUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BANARISUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BANARISUG.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BANARISUG.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BANARISUG.NS trades at ₹3,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BANARISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BANARISUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BANARISUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BANARISUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DALMIASUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DALMIASUG.BO trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DALMIASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DALMIASUG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DALMIASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DALMIASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DALMIASUG.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DALMIASUG.NS trades at ₹323.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DALMIASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DALMIASUG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DALMIASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DALMIASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BAJAJHIND.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BAJAJHIND.BO trades at ₹18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BAJAJHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 95.53. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJAJHIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BAJAJHIND.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BAJAJHIND.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BAJAJHIND.NS trades at ₹18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BAJAJHIND.NS's P/E ratio is 95.42. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJAJHIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BAJAJHIND.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs NITTAGELA.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NITTAGELA.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while NITTAGELA.BO trades at ₹1,713.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas NITTAGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NITTAGELA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to NITTAGELA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check NITTAGELA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs AVADHSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while AVADHSUGAR.NS trades at ₹447.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas AVADHSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check AVADHSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs AVADHSUGAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while AVADHSUGAR.BO trades at ₹437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas AVADHSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check AVADHSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DHAMPURSUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DHAMPURSUG.BO trades at ₹136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DHAMPURSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DHAMPURSUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DHAMPURSUG.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DHAMPURSUG.NS trades at ₹136.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DHAMPURSUG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DHAMPURSUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs LOTUSCHO.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LOTUSCHO.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while LOTUSCHO.BO trades at ₹683.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas LOTUSCHO.BO's P/E ratio is -1899.72. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOTUSCHO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to LOTUSCHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check LOTUSCHO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs UTTAMSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while UTTAMSUGAR.NS trades at ₹226.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check UTTAMSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs UTTAMSUGAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while UTTAMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹227.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check UTTAMSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs VADILENT.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VADILENT.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while VADILENT.BO trades at ₹9,801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas VADILENT.BO's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VADILENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to VADILENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check VADILENT.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DWARKESH.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DWARKESH.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DWARKESH.NS trades at ₹42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DWARKESH.NS's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWARKESH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DWARKESH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DWARKESH.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DWARKESH.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DWARKESH.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DWARKESH.BO trades at ₹42.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DWARKESH.BO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWARKESH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DWARKESH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DWARKESH.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MAGADSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAGADSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MAGADSUGAR.NS trades at ₹458.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MAGADSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MAGADSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MCLEODRUSS.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹59.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs UGARSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while UGARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas UGARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UGARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check UGARSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs UGARSUGAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while UGARSUGAR.BO trades at ₹38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas UGARSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UGARSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check UGARSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MAWANASUG.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MAWANASUG.NS trades at ₹105.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MAWANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAWANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to MAWANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MAWANASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MAWANASUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MAWANASUG.BO trades at ₹105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MAWANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAWANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to MAWANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MAWANASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DAVANGERE.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DAVANGERE.NS trades at ₹3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DAVANGERE.NS's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAVANGERE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DAVANGERE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DAVANGERE.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SHEETAL.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHEETAL.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SHEETAL.NS trades at ₹295.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SHEETAL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHEETAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SHEETAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SHEETAL.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DAVANGERE.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DAVANGERE.BO trades at ₹3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DAVANGERE.BO's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAVANGERE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DAVANGERE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DAVANGERE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DCMSRIND.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DCMSRIND.BO trades at ₹38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DCMSRIND.BO's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCMSRIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DCMSRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DCMSRIND.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SHAWGELTIN.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHAWGELTIN.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SHAWGELTIN.BO trades at ₹473.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SHAWGELTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SHAWGELTIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs PONNIERODE.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while PONNIERODE.NS trades at ₹315.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas PONNIERODE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PONNIERODE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to PONNIERODE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check PONNIERODE.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs PONNIERODE.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while PONNIERODE.BO trades at ₹314.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas PONNIERODE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PONNIERODE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to PONNIERODE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check PONNIERODE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs KCPSUGIND.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KCPSUGIND.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while KCPSUGIND.NS trades at ₹22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas KCPSUGIND.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to KCPSUGIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check KCPSUGIND.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TIERRA.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIERRA.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TIERRA.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TIERRA.BO's P/E ratio is -47.44. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIERRA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to TIERRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TIERRA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs KMSUGAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while KMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas KMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to KMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check KMSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs ANNAPURNA.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANNAPURNA.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while ANNAPURNA.NS trades at ₹130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas ANNAPURNA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANNAPURNA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to ANNAPURNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check ANNAPURNA.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SSFL.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SSFL.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SSFL.NS trades at ₹254.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SSFL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSFL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SSFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SSFL.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs GOYALSALT.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GOYALSALT.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while GOYALSALT.NS trades at ₹119.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas GOYALSALT.NS's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOYALSALT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to GOYALSALT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check GOYALSALT.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs IWP.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IWP.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while IWP.BO trades at ₹33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas IWP.BO's P/E ratio is 115.38. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IWP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to IWP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check IWP.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SAKHTISUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAKHTISUG.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SAKHTISUG.BO trades at ₹17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SAKHTISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAKHTISUG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SAKHTISUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SAKHTISUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs RANASUG.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RANASUG.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while RANASUG.NS trades at ₹12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas RANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to RANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check RANASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs RANASUG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RANASUG.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while RANASUG.BO trades at ₹12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas RANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to RANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check RANASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs AJANTSOY.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AJANTSOY.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while AJANTSOY.BO trades at ₹22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas AJANTSOY.BO's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AJANTSOY.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to AJANTSOY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check AJANTSOY.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs BAMBINO.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAMBINO.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while BAMBINO.BO trades at ₹203.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas BAMBINO.BO's P/E ratio is 59.52. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAMBINO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to BAMBINO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check BAMBINO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SHRIGANG.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHRIGANG.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SHRIGANG.BO trades at ₹67.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SHRIGANG.BO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIGANG.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIGANG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SHRIGANG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TIRUSTA.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIRUSTA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TIRUSTA.BO trades at ₹124.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TIRUSTA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIRUSTA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to TIRUSTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TIRUSTA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs VISHWARAJ.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while VISHWARAJ.NS trades at ₹5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas VISHWARAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VISHWARAJ.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check VISHWARAJ.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs VISHWARAJ.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while VISHWARAJ.BO trades at ₹5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas VISHWARAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VISHWARAJ.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check VISHWARAJ.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs NAPL.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAPL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while NAPL.BO trades at ₹198.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas NAPL.BO's P/E ratio is -74.75. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAPL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to NAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check NAPL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs PALASHSECU.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PALASHSECU.BO has a market cap of 926.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while PALASHSECU.BO trades at ₹93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas PALASHSECU.BO's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PALASHSECU.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to PALASHSECU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check PALASHSECU.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs KORE.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KORE.BO has a market cap of 886.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while KORE.BO trades at ₹34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas KORE.BO's P/E ratio is 288.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KORE.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to KORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check KORE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs UNIVSTAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNIVSTAR.BO has a market cap of 873.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while UNIVSTAR.BO trades at ₹208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas UNIVSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is -88.95. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIVSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check UNIVSTAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs VASUPRADA.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VASUPRADA.BO has a market cap of 840.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while VASUPRADA.BO trades at ₹101.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas VASUPRADA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VASUPRADA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to VASUPRADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check VASUPRADA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs HFIL.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HFIL.BO has a market cap of 767.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while HFIL.BO trades at ₹9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas HFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HFIL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to HFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check HFIL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SAMPRE.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAMPRE.BO has a market cap of 685.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SAMPRE.BO trades at ₹7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SAMPRE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAMPRE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SAMPRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SAMPRE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs KFBL.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KFBL.BO has a market cap of 658.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while KFBL.BO trades at ₹43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas KFBL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KFBL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to KFBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check KFBL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs FLEXFO.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLEXFO.BO has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while FLEXFO.BO trades at ₹51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas FLEXFO.BO's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLEXFO.BO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to FLEXFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check FLEXFO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs ITALIANE.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ITALIANE.NS has a market cap of 532M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while ITALIANE.NS trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas ITALIANE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITALIANE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to ITALIANE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check ITALIANE.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs PRUDMOULI.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PRUDMOULI.NS has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while PRUDMOULI.NS trades at ₹16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas PRUDMOULI.NS's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRUDMOULI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to PRUDMOULI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check PRUDMOULI.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs GAYATRIBI.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GAYATRIBI.BO has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while GAYATRIBI.BO trades at ₹7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas GAYATRIBI.BO's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GAYATRIBI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to GAYATRIBI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check GAYATRIBI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DILIGENT.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DILIGENT.BO has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DILIGENT.BO trades at ₹2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DILIGENT.BO's P/E ratio is 59.79. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DILIGENT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DILIGENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DILIGENT.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs ANJANIFOODS.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANJANIFOODS.BO has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while ANJANIFOODS.BO trades at ₹17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas ANJANIFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.85. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check ANJANIFOODS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS trades at ₹23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check NFPSAMPOOR-SM.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs DHARSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while DHARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas DHARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to DHARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check DHARSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SIMBHALS.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.NS has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SIMBHALS.NS trades at ₹6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SIMBHALS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMBHALS.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SIMBHALS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SIMBHALS.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SIMBHALS.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.BO has a market cap of 275.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SIMBHALS.BO trades at ₹6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SIMBHALS.BO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMBHALS.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SIMBHALS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SIMBHALS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs AMBOAGRI.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMBOAGRI.BO has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while AMBOAGRI.BO trades at ₹13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas AMBOAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is 51.22. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBOAGRI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to AMBOAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check AMBOAGRI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SONALIS.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SONALIS.BO has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SONALIS.BO trades at ₹47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SONALIS.BO's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SONALIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to SONALIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SONALIS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TAPIFRUIT.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TAPIFRUIT.NS has a market cap of 209.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TAPIFRUIT.NS trades at ₹49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TAPIFRUIT.NS's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAPIFRUIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to TAPIFRUIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TAPIFRUIT.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs PRIMAIN.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PRIMAIN.BO has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while PRIMAIN.BO trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas PRIMAIN.BO's P/E ratio is -36.46. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRIMAIN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to PRIMAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check PRIMAIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SHAHFOOD.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHAHFOOD.BO has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SHAHFOOD.BO trades at ₹206.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SHAHFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 289.78. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHAHFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to SHAHFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SHAHFOOD.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs CHOTHANI.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHOTHANI.BO has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while CHOTHANI.BO trades at ₹9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas CHOTHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 89.45. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHOTHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to CHOTHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check CHOTHANI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs CJGEL.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CJGEL.BO has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while CJGEL.BO trades at ₹20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas CJGEL.BO's P/E ratio is -83.51. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CJGEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to CJGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check CJGEL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TARAI.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TARAI.BO has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TARAI.BO trades at ₹5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TARAI.BO's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TARAI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to TARAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TARAI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs THIRUSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, THIRUSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while THIRUSUGAR.NS trades at ₹6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas THIRUSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check THIRUSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TRANSFD.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRANSFD.BO has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TRANSFD.BO trades at ₹526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TRANSFD.BO's P/E ratio is -152.91. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRANSFD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSFD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TRANSFD.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs SUNRETAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUNRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while SUNRETAIL.BO trades at ₹0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas SUNRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNRETAIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to SUNRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check SUNRETAIL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs LONTE.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LONTE.BO has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while LONTE.BO trades at ₹14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas LONTE.BO's P/E ratio is -18.76. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LONTE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is less volatile compared to LONTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check LONTE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs TRICOMFRU.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRICOMFRU.BO has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while TRICOMFRU.BO trades at ₹1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas TRICOMFRU.BO's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRICOMFRU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to TRICOMFRU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check TRICOMFRU.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.BO vs MADHURIND.BO Comparison July 2026
KCPSUGIND.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.BO stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MADHURIND.BO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.BO is priced at ₹22.17, while MADHURIND.BO trades at ₹5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.39, whereas MADHURIND.BO's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADHURIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.BO is more volatile compared to MADHURIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.BO.Check MADHURIND.BO's competition here