Klabin S.A.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while UPMMY trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while UPMKF trades at $25.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SUZ trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SCABY trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8.81B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SVCBF trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while MONDF trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MONDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SEOAY trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -61.53. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while MONDY trades at $30.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while LPX trades at $87.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while UFPI trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while WFG trades at $74.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -1060.00. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while OJIPF trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while OJIPY trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while POELF trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while STLJF trades at $48.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while HLMNY trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SLVM trades at $59.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while BLRDF trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while PIKQF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and PIKQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while NDGPY trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and NDGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while RFP trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while NDGPF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SWM trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SPPJY trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while CFPZF trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while LMPMY trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.64M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.81M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 501.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while IFSPF trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 423.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while CLW trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.16M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 285.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while MATV trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 234.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while MERC trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 223.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while ACAZF trades at $12.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.58M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while RTERF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 124.91M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while ACSYF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while WFSTF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and WFSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while GLT trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and GLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 71.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while GFELF trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and GFELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 64.42M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while ICLTF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and ICLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 41.36M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while KEWL trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to KEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while CFPUF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and CFPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while EVA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 22.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while NWGL trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while RUBNF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while TCOR trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and JCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while JCTC trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while CFXTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and CFXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 8.50M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SGTM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while ITP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while HMTC trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while BSTO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and BSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 18714.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while SGMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5710.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while EXRG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXRG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5228.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while BPMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, NP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while NP trades at $31.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, VRDSF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, KPCM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while KPCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, VRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while VRS trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, UFS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while UFS trades at $55.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY is less volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLBAY.

KLBAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KLBAY stands at 20.34B. In comparison, HAIPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KLBAY is priced at $6.69, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KLBAY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.82, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, KLBAY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLBAY and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).