Kirloskar Industries Limited
Kirloskar Industries Limited (KIRLOSIND.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIRLOSIND.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIRLOSIND.NS | ₹2,850.90 | -3.97% | 30B | 18.47 | ₹154.37 | +0.46% |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹17,897.00 | -0.20% | 268.3B | 399.22 | ₹44.83 | N/A |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹17,891.15 | -0.25% | 268.2B | 399.00 | ₹44.84 | N/A |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,349.40 | +0.70% | 146.2B | 55.63 | ₹42.23 | +0.14% |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,345.50 | +0.64% | 145.9B | 55.48 | ₹42.28 | +0.14% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,329.70 | +0.17% | 125.4B | 43.94 | ₹30.26 | +0.23% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,579.80 | -0.76% | 115.1B | 30.01 | ₹52.65 | +0.73% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,579.60 | -0.67% | 115B | 29.94 | ₹52.76 | +0.73% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹440.30 | -3.39% | 90.9B | 53.11 | ₹8.29 | +0.57% |
| RHIM.BO | ₹440.00 | -3.42% | 90.9B | 53.08 | ₹8.29 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
KIRLOSIND.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 268.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹17,897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 399.22. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 268.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹17,891.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 399.00. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SANSERA.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,349.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 55.63. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SANSERA.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,345.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 55.48. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,329.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,579.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,579.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹440.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 53.08. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹406.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹459.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹897.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹888.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,842.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,352.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -140.58. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹218.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 57.77. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹218.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 57.38. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹478.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹478.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MMFL.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹460.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹281.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹4,320.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 88.97. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹796.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹795.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹118.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹902.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹900.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹115.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹114.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹717.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs TEMBO.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹520.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 98.82. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹519.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 99.04. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹3,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹546.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹36.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 72.33. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹990.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹59.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹59.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹138.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹138.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹439.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹1,849.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -3031.23. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹154.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AEL.BO trades at ₹138.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -76.33. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹145.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹486.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DCM.BO trades at ₹81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DCM.NS trades at ₹80.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹162.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹119.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -42.54. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹129.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while MUL.BO trades at ₹9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SMLT.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SMLT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SMLT.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 968.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹70.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 940M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹164.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 392.14. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is -58.69. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -38.17. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -322.10. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 612M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 85.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs HILTON.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 431.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹119.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 395M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 290M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹82.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.97. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -25.86. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 45.60. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
KIRLOSIND.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison February 2026
KIRLOSIND.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSIND.NS stands at 30B. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSIND.NS is priced at ₹2,850.90, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.47, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSIND.NS is less volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSIND.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here