Kalyani Investment Company Limited
Kalyani Investment Company Limited (KICL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KICL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KICL.NS | ₹4,903.10 | +0.00% | 21.4B | 48.07 | ₹101.98 | N/A |
| JIOFIN.NS | ₹258.60 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 104.27 | ₹2.48 | +0.19% |
| JIOFIN.BO | ₹258.75 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 101.81 | ₹2.54 | +0.19% |
| BAJAJHLDNG.NS | ₹11,188.00 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 14.45 | ₹774.21 | +0.83% |
| BAJAJHLDNG.BO | ₹11,177.80 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 14.15 | ₹789.70 | +0.83% |
| UTINIFTETF.BO | ₹288.77 | +0.00% | 622.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NAM-INDIA.NS | ₹940.85 | +0.00% | 609.7B | 42.78 | ₹22.37 | +1.99% |
| NAM-INDIA.BO | ₹941.45 | +0.00% | 609.6B | 42.87 | ₹22.32 | +1.99% |
| HDFCAMC.NS | ₹2,732.20 | +0.00% | 581.6B | 40.53 | ₹67.01 | +1.66% |
| HDFCAMC.BO | ₹2,731.85 | +0.00% | 580.8B | 40.50 | ₹66.99 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
KICL.NS vs JIOFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JIOFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JIOFIN.NS trades at ₹258.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JIOFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 104.27. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JIOFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JIOFIN.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs JIOFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JIOFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JIOFIN.BO trades at ₹258.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JIOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 101.81. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JIOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JIOFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JIOFIN.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs BAJAJHLDNG.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BAJAJHLDNG.NS trades at ₹11,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs BAJAJHLDNG.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BAJAJHLDNG.BO trades at ₹11,177.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTINIFTETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTINIFTETF.BO has a market cap of 622.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTINIFTETF.BO trades at ₹288.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTINIFTETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTINIFTETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to UTINIFTETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTINIFTETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NAM-INDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.NS has a market cap of 609.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NAM-INDIA.NS trades at ₹940.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NAM-INDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAM-INDIA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NAM-INDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.BO has a market cap of 609.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NAM-INDIA.BO trades at ₹941.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NAM-INDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAM-INDIA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs HDFCAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.NS has a market cap of 581.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while HDFCAMC.NS trades at ₹2,732.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas HDFCAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDFCAMC.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check HDFCAMC.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs HDFCAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.BO has a market cap of 580.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while HDFCAMC.BO trades at ₹2,731.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas HDFCAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HDFCAMC.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to HDFCAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check HDFCAMC.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTISENSETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.BO has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTISENSETF.BO trades at ₹942.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTISENSETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTISENSETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTISENSETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTISENSETF.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.NS has a market cap of 476.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTISENSETF.NS trades at ₹939.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTISENSETF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTISENSETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTISENSETF.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs CPSEETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CPSEETF.BO has a market cap of 461.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while CPSEETF.BO trades at ₹100.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas CPSEETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSEETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to CPSEETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check CPSEETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs CPSEETF.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, CPSEETF.NS has a market cap of 461.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while CPSEETF.NS trades at ₹100.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas CPSEETF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSEETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to CPSEETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check CPSEETF.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs 360ONE.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, 360ONE.NS has a market cap of 446.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while 360ONE.NS trades at ₹1,104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas 360ONE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 360ONE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check 360ONE.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs 360ONE.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, 360ONE.BO has a market cap of 446B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while 360ONE.BO trades at ₹1,104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas 360ONE.BO's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 360ONE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check 360ONE.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs ABSLAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.BO has a market cap of 265.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ABSLAMC.BO trades at ₹894.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ABSLAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABSLAMC.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ABSLAMC.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs ABSLAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.NS has a market cap of 265.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ABSLAMC.NS trades at ₹896.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ABSLAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABSLAMC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ABSLAMC.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs ANANDRATHI.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.NS has a market cap of 250.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ANANDRATHI.NS trades at ₹3,022.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ANANDRATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANANDRATHI.NS's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs ANANDRATHI.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.BO has a market cap of 250.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ANANDRATHI.BO trades at ₹3,022.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ANANDRATHI.BO's P/E ratio is 68.05. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANANDRATHI.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIFTYBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.BO has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIFTYBEES.BO trades at ₹288.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIFTYBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIFTYBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIFTYBEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIFTYBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIFTYBEES.NS has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIFTYBEES.NS trades at ₹288.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIFTYBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIFTYBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIFTYBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIFTYBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NUVAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NUVAMA.BO has a market cap of 235.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NUVAMA.BO trades at ₹1,293.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NUVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NUVAMA.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NUVAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NUVAMA.NS has a market cap of 234.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NUVAMA.NS trades at ₹1,293.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NUVAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUVAMA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NUVAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NUVAMA.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIFTYIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.BO has a market cap of 231.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIFTYIETF.BO trades at ₹287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIFTYIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIFTYIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIFTYIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIFTYIETF.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIFTYIETF.NS has a market cap of 230.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIFTYIETF.NS trades at ₹287.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIFTYIETF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIFTYIETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NIFTYIETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIFTYIETF.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs GOLDBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GOLDBEES.NS has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while GOLDBEES.NS trades at ₹127.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas GOLDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check GOLDBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NSDL.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NSDL.BO has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NSDL.BO trades at ₹927.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NSDL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSDL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NSDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NSDL.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs IDFC.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IDFC.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while IDFC.NS trades at ₹108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas IDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDFC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to IDFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check IDFC.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs IDFC.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, IDFC.BO has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while IDFC.BO trades at ₹108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas IDFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDFC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS and IDFC.BO have similar daily volatility (2.93).Check IDFC.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTIAMC.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTIAMC.BO has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTIAMC.BO trades at ₹1,054.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTIAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTIAMC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to UTIAMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTIAMC.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTIAMC.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTIAMC.NS has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTIAMC.NS trades at ₹1,056.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTIAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTIAMC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to UTIAMC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTIAMC.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs SENSEXIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SENSEXIETF.BO has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SENSEXIETF.BO trades at ₹947.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SENSEXIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SENSEXIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to SENSEXIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SENSEXIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs LIQUIDBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LIQUIDBEES.NS has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while LIQUIDBEES.NS trades at ₹1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas LIQUIDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to LIQUIDBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check LIQUIDBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs PRUDENT.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PRUDENT.NS has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PRUDENT.NS trades at ₹2,569.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PRUDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.09. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUDENT.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PRUDENT.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs PRUDENT.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PRUDENT.BO has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PRUDENT.BO trades at ₹2,560.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PRUDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 51.93. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRUDENT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PRUDENT.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs TSFINV.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TSFINV.NS has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while TSFINV.NS trades at ₹423.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas TSFINV.NS's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSFINV.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to TSFINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check TSFINV.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs BANKBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BANKBEES.NS has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BANKBEES.NS trades at ₹626.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BANKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BANKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BANKBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs BANKBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BANKBEES.BO has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BANKBEES.BO trades at ₹625.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BANKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BANKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BANKBEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs INDUSINVIT.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, INDUSINVIT.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while INDUSINVIT.BO trades at ₹122.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas INDUSINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INDUSINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check INDUSINVIT.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs JUNIORBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.NS has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JUNIORBEES.NS trades at ₹743.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JUNIORBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUNIORBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JUNIORBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs JUNIORBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JUNIORBEES.BO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JUNIORBEES.BO trades at ₹744.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JUNIORBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUNIORBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to JUNIORBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JUNIORBEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs SENSEXBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SENSEXBEES.BO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SENSEXBEES.BO trades at ₹941.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SENSEXBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SENSEXBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to SENSEXBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SENSEXBEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PILANIINVS.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PILANIINVS.BO trades at ₹4,594.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PILANIINVS.BO's P/E ratio is 176.59. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PILANIINVS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to PILANIINVS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PILANIINVS.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PILANIINVS.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PILANIINVS.NS trades at ₹4,583.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PILANIINVS.NS's P/E ratio is 5028.68. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PILANIINVS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to PILANIINVS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PILANIINVS.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs BHINVIT.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BHINVIT.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BHINVIT.BO trades at ₹112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BHINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BHINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BHINVIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BHINVIT.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs 0P00017K5W.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, 0P00017K5W.BO has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while 0P00017K5W.BO trades at ₹44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas 0P00017K5W.BO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00017K5W.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check 0P00017K5W.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs LOWVOLIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LOWVOLIETF.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while LOWVOLIETF.BO trades at ₹22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas LOWVOLIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to LOWVOLIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check LOWVOLIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs BANKIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BANKIETF.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BANKIETF.BO trades at ₹62.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BANKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BANKIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BANKIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PSUBNKBEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PSUBNKBEES.BO trades at ₹105.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PSUBNKBEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PSUBNKBEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PSUBNKBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PSUBNKBEES.NS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PSUBNKBEES.NS trades at ₹105.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PSUBNKBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to PSUBNKBEES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PSUBNKBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NSIL.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NSIL.NS trades at ₹5,972.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 121.19. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSIL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NSIL.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NSIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NSIL.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NSIL.BO trades at ₹5,932.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 120.76. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to NSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NSIL.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PVTBANIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PVTBANIETF.BO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PVTBANIETF.BO trades at ₹29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PVTBANIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PVTBANIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to PVTBANIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PVTBANIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs SETFNIF50.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.BO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SETFNIF50.BO trades at ₹272.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SETFNIF50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SETFNIF50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to SETFNIF50.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SETFNIF50.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs SETFNIF50.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SETFNIF50.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SETFNIF50.NS trades at ₹272.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SETFNIF50.NS's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SETFNIF50.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to SETFNIF50.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SETFNIF50.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs GOLDSHARE.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, GOLDSHARE.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while GOLDSHARE.NS trades at ₹114.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas GOLDSHARE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLDSHARE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDSHARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check GOLDSHARE.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs UTINEXT50.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, UTINEXT50.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while UTINEXT50.BO trades at ₹73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas UTINEXT50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UTINEXT50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to UTINEXT50.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check UTINEXT50.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs KICL.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, KICL.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while KICL.BO trades at ₹4,898.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas KICL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.40. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KICL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to KICL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check KICL.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs LTGILTBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, LTGILTBEES.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while LTGILTBEES.NS trades at ₹29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas LTGILTBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTGILTBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to LTGILTBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check LTGILTBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs ALPL30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ALPL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ALPL30IETF.BO trades at ₹28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ALPL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALPL30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ALPL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ALPL30IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs BFINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BFINVEST.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BFINVEST.BO trades at ₹402.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BFINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BFINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BFINVEST.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs BFINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BFINVEST.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BFINVEST.NS trades at ₹402.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BFINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BFINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BFINVEST.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs MID150BEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MID150BEES.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while MID150BEES.NS trades at ₹225.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas MID150BEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MID150BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to MID150BEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check MID150BEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs JINDALPHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JINDALPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,375.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JINDALPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JINDALPHOT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs JINDALPHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JINDALPHOT.NS trades at ₹1,364.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JINDALPHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JINDALPHOT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs JPOLYINVST.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JPOLYINVST.NS trades at ₹1,306.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JPOLYINVST.NS's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPOLYINVST.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs JPOLYINVST.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while JPOLYINVST.BO trades at ₹1,304.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas JPOLYINVST.BO's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPOLYINVST.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NEXT50IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NEXT50IETF.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NEXT50IETF.BO trades at ₹72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NEXT50IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXT50IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NEXT50IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NEXT50IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs OSWALGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while OSWALGREEN.BO trades at ₹27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas OSWALGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 81.41. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSWALGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs OSWALGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while OSWALGREEN.NS trades at ₹27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas OSWALGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 81.21. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSWALGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs EBIX.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, EBIX.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while EBIX.BO trades at ₹35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas EBIX.BO's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBIX.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to EBIX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check EBIX.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs HNGSNGBEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HNGSNGBEES.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while HNGSNGBEES.NS trades at ₹540.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas HNGSNGBEES.NS's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to HNGSNGBEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check HNGSNGBEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs BINDALAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BINDALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BINDALAGRO.NS trades at ₹22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BINDALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BINDALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BINDALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BINDALAGRO.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs SILINV.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SILINV.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SILINV.NS trades at ₹448.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SILINV.NS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SILINV.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to SILINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SILINV.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs SILINV.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, SILINV.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while SILINV.BO trades at ₹450.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas SILINV.BO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SILINV.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to SILINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check SILINV.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs MIDCAPIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MIDCAPIETF.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while MIDCAPIETF.BO trades at ₹22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas MIDCAPIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check MIDCAPIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs FMCGIETF.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while FMCGIETF.NS trades at ₹55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas FMCGIETF.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMCGIETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is less volatile compared to FMCGIETF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check FMCGIETF.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs FMCGIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FMCGIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while FMCGIETF.BO trades at ₹55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas FMCGIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FMCGIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to FMCGIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check FMCGIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs ITIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ITIETF.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ITIETF.BO trades at ₹35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ITIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ITIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ITIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs MOM30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MOM30IETF.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while MOM30IETF.BO trades at ₹31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas MOM30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOM30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to MOM30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check MOM30IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs BSE500IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, BSE500IETF.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while BSE500IETF.BO trades at ₹39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas BSE500IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSE500IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to BSE500IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check BSE500IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs 0P00005WLX.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, 0P00005WLX.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while 0P00005WLX.BO trades at ₹239.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas 0P00005WLX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00005WLX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00005WLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check 0P00005WLX.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs ICICIB22.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ICICIB22.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ICICIB22.BO trades at ₹125.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ICICIB22.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICICIB22.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIB22.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ICICIB22.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs ICICIB22.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, ICICIB22.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while ICICIB22.NS trades at ₹125.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas ICICIB22.NS's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICICIB22.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIB22.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check ICICIB22.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIF100BEES.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIF100BEES.BO trades at ₹275.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIF100BEES.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIF100BEES.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIF100BEES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIF100BEES.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIF100BEES.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIF100BEES.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIF100BEES.NS trades at ₹276.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIF100BEES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIF100BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIF100BEES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIF100BEES.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs TIMESGTY.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while TIMESGTY.NS trades at ₹286.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas TIMESGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 110.08. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIMESGTY.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check TIMESGTY.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs TIMESGTY.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while TIMESGTY.BO trades at ₹283.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas TIMESGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TIMESGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check TIMESGTY.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs TEAMGTY.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while TEAMGTY.BO trades at ₹252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas TEAMGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 89.68. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEAMGTY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to TEAMGTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check TEAMGTY.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs TEAMGTY.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while TEAMGTY.NS trades at ₹252.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas TEAMGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 89.36. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEAMGTY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to TEAMGTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check TEAMGTY.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs NV20IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NV20IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NV20IETF.BO trades at ₹14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NV20IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NV20IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NV20IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NV20IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs HEALTHIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, HEALTHIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while HEALTHIETF.BO trades at ₹148.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas HEALTHIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HEALTHIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to HEALTHIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check HEALTHIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs AUTOIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, AUTOIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while AUTOIETF.BO trades at ₹28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas AUTOIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUTOIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check AUTOIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs MON100.NS Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, MON100.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while MON100.NS trades at ₹229.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas MON100.NS's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MON100.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to MON100.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check MON100.NS's competition here
KICL.NS vs INFRAIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, INFRAIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while INFRAIETF.BO trades at ₹98.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas INFRAIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INFRAIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to INFRAIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check INFRAIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs FINIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, FINIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while FINIETF.BO trades at ₹32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas FINIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to FINIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check FINIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs QUAL30IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, QUAL30IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while QUAL30IETF.BO trades at ₹21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas QUAL30IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUAL30IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to QUAL30IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check QUAL30IETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs PSUBNKIETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, PSUBNKIETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while PSUBNKIETF.BO trades at ₹96.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas PSUBNKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSUBNKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to PSUBNKIETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check PSUBNKIETF.BO's competition here
KICL.NS vs NIF100IETF.BO Comparison February 2026
KICL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KICL.NS stands at 21.4B. In comparison, NIF100IETF.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KICL.NS is priced at ₹4,903.10, while NIF100IETF.BO trades at ₹29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KICL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.07, whereas NIF100IETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KICL.NS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIF100IETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KICL.NS is more volatile compared to NIF100IETF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KICL.NS.Check NIF100IETF.BO's competition here