Kongsberg Automotive ASA

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while FYGGY trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check FYGGY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while DNZOY trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check DNZOY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while DNZOF trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check DNZOF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while BRDCY trades at $22.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check BRDCY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MGDDF trades at $38.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MGDDF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while BRDCF trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check BRDCF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MGDDY trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MGDDY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SMTOY trades at $27.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SMTOY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CTTAF trades at $90.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CTTAF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CTTAY trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CTTAY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while KNRRY trades at $26.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check KNRRY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while KNBHF trades at $100.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check KNBHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while PTAIY trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check PTAIY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check PTAIF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ASEKY trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ASEKY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while HLLGY trades at $50.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 49.68. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check HLLGY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check HLKHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ASEKF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NGKSY trades at $18.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NGKSY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while PLLIF trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check PLLIF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NGKSF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SFFLY trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SFFLY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MNTHY trades at $83.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MNTHY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while YORUY trades at $26.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check YORUY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while KOTMY trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check KOTMY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while YORUF trades at $25.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check YORUF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check BRBOY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MNTHF trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MNTHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SCFLF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while STAEY trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check STAEY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check KOTMF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while BRBOF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check BRBOF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while JEHLY trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check JEHLY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while LIMAF trades at $52.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check LIMAF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SMTUF trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is -31.91. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SMTUF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while VLEEY trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check VLEEY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while STAEF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check STAEF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while VLEEF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check VLEEF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while FURCF trades at $13.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FURCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check FURCF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while JELCF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check JELCF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NPSKY trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NPSKY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NHKGF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while TGOSY trades at $37.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check TGOSY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while TDBOF trades at $13.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check TDBOF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NIFCY trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NIFCY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check VTSCF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NTXVF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NTXVF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NPSKF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ARBFF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MBUMY trades at $7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MBUMY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MBUMF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check GMPUF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check UNIEF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while FAURY trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAURY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check FAURY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while PASTF trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check PASTF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NKRKY trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -32.17. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NKRKY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NKRKF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -29.03. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NKRKF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while TIANF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check TIANF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 817.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SFHLF trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SFHLF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while GUDDY trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check GUDDY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 777M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ATNNF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ABDDF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 692.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while GUDHF trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check GUDHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check FCVFF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NMAKF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NMAKF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 491.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while MRETF trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check MRETF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while IOCJY trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check IOCJY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while TCISF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check TCISF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SAEOF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check VTSCY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check PWRHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NPSGF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NPSGF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while EGKLF trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check EGKLF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 295.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ELLRY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NPSGY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while WLMTF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check WLMTF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check XNGIF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check AKBIF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while AMGRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check AMGRF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while EXCOF trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check EXCOF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SCTH trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -464.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SCTH's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check HWAFF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while FESTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check FESTF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while LEAT trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LEAT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check LEAT's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CAOHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CCEGF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CCEGF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NFGRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NFGRF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while STSGF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check STSGF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check NWFAF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check VOAXF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CREVF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CREVF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CMMCF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CMMCF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while CDTI trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check CDTI's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check ATHHF's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while AFFL trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check AFFL's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while UFMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check UFMG's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while AMTY trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check AMTY's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while OPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check OPTI's competition here

KGAUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KGAUF stands at 120.8M. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGAUF is priced at $0.13, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KGAUF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.50, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, KGAUF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KGAUF is less volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGAUF.Check SPKTF's competition here