TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KETA.CN's competitors and their performance on the CNQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KETA.CN and its CNQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KETA.CN | CA$0.19 | +35.71% | 3.3M | -5.18 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| EXE.TO | CA$30.67 | +0.39% | 2.9B | 22.29 | CA$1.36 | +1.70% |
| SIA.TO | CA$21.52 | -0.05% | 2.1B | 41.37 | CA$0.52 | +4.35% |
| DNTL.TO | CA$11.00 | +0.09% | 2.1B | -78.57 | -CA$0.14 | +0.23% |
| WELL.TO | CA$4.30 | -4.66% | 1.2B | 9.70 | CA$0.47 | N/A |
| DR.TO | CA$15.50 | -0.90% | 274.5M | 16.56 | CA$0.94 | +2.32% |
| AIDX.TO | CA$0.76 | -1.30% | 239.1M | -4.57 | -CA$0.17 | N/A |
| CRRX.TO | CA$3.18 | +1.60% | 202.4M | 7.55 | CA$0.42 | +2.52% |
| DRDR.TO | CA$0.55 | -9.84% | 49.4M | -0.83 | -CA$0.66 | N/A |
| GTMS.TO | CA$0.97 | -15.65% | 28.6M | -0.45 | -CA$2.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Extendicare Inc. (TSX: EXE.TO)
KETA.CN vs EXE.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EXE.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while EXE.TO trades at CA$30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas EXE.TO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXE.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to EXE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check EXE.TO's competition here
Sienna Senior Living Inc. (TSX: SIA.TO)
KETA.CN vs SIA.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SIA.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while SIA.TO trades at CA$21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas SIA.TO's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIA.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to SIA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check SIA.TO's competition here
dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. (TSX: DNTL.TO)
KETA.CN vs DNTL.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DNTL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while DNTL.TO trades at CA$11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas DNTL.TO's P/E ratio is -78.57. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNTL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to DNTL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check DNTL.TO's competition here
WELL Health Technologies Corp. (TSX: WELL.TO)
KETA.CN vs WELL.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WELL.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while WELL.TO trades at CA$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas WELL.TO's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to WELL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check WELL.TO's competition here
Medical Facilities Corporation (TSX: DR.TO)
KETA.CN vs DR.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DR.TO has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while DR.TO trades at CA$15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas DR.TO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DR.TO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to DR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check DR.TO's competition here
Healwell AI Inc. (TSX: AIDX.TO)
KETA.CN vs AIDX.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, AIDX.TO has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while AIDX.TO trades at CA$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas AIDX.TO's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIDX.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to AIDX.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check AIDX.TO's competition here
CareRx Corporation (TSX: CRRX.TO)
KETA.CN vs CRRX.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CRRX.TO has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while CRRX.TO trades at CA$3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas CRRX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRRX.TO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is similarly volatile compared to CRRX.TO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check CRRX.TO's competition here
MCI Onehealth Technologies Inc. (TSX: DRDR.TO)
KETA.CN vs DRDR.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DRDR.TO has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while DRDR.TO trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas DRDR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRDR.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to DRDR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check DRDR.TO's competition here
Greenbrook TMS Inc. (TSX: GTMS.TO)
KETA.CN vs GTMS.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GTMS.TO has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while GTMS.TO trades at CA$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas GTMS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTMS.TO's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to GTMS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check GTMS.TO's competition here
Numinus Wellness Inc. (TSX: NUMI.TO)
KETA.CN vs NUMI.TO Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NUMI.TO has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while NUMI.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas NUMI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NUMI.TO's ROE of +8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is similarly volatile compared to NUMI.TO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check NUMI.TO's competition here
Empower Clinics Inc. (CNQ: EPW.CN)
KETA.CN vs EPW.CN Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, EPW.CN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while EPW.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas EPW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPW.CN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is similarly volatile compared to EPW.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check EPW.CN's competition here
Revitalist Lifestyle and Wellness Ltd. (CNQ: CALM.CN)
KETA.CN vs CALM.CN Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CALM.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while CALM.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas CALM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CALM.CN's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is similarly volatile compared to CALM.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check CALM.CN's competition here
Optima Medical Innovations Corp. (CNQ: OMIC.CN)
KETA.CN vs OMIC.CN Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, OMIC.CN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while OMIC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas OMIC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMIC.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is similarly volatile compared to OMIC.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check OMIC.CN's competition here
Wellbeing Digital Sciences Inc. (NEO: MEDI.NE)
KETA.CN vs MEDI.NE Comparison August 2026
TripSitter Clinic Ltd. (CNQ: KETA.CN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KETA.CN stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MEDI.NE has a market cap of 17.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KETA.CN is priced at CA$0.19 on the CNQ, while MEDI.NE trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KETA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -5.18, whereas MEDI.NE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KETA.CN's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEDI.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KETA.CN is less volatile compared to MEDI.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KETA.CN.Check MEDI.NE's competition here