Kesoram Industries Limited

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.NS has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ULTRACEMCO.NS trades at ₹12,960.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ULTRACEMCO.NS's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ULTRACEMCO.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.BO has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ULTRACEMCO.BO trades at ₹12,951.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ULTRACEMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 49.66. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ULTRACEMCO.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GRASIM.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GRASIM.NS trades at ₹2,879.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GRASIM.NS's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GRASIM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to GRASIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GRASIM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GRASIM.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GRASIM.BO trades at ₹2,877.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GRASIM.BO's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GRASIM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to GRASIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GRASIM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while AMBUJACEM.NS trades at ₹514.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas AMBUJACEM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to AMBUJACEM.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check AMBUJACEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while AMBUJACEM.BO trades at ₹514.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas AMBUJACEM.BO's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to AMBUJACEM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check AMBUJACEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHREECEM.NS has a market cap of 957B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SHREECEM.NS trades at ₹26,525.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SHREECEM.NS's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SHREECEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SHREECEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHREECEM.BO has a market cap of 956.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SHREECEM.BO trades at ₹26,509.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SHREECEM.BO's P/E ratio is 55.68. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SHREECEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SHREECEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JKCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 434.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JKCEMENT.NS trades at ₹5,626.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JKCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JKCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JKCEMENT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JKCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 434.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JKCEMENT.BO trades at ₹5,620.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JKCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JKCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JKCEMENT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DALBHARAT.NS has a market cap of 388.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while DALBHARAT.NS trades at ₹2,069.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas DALBHARAT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to DALBHARAT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check DALBHARAT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DALBHARAT.BO has a market cap of 388B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while DALBHARAT.BO trades at ₹2,068.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas DALBHARAT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to DALBHARAT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check DALBHARAT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACC.NS has a market cap of 304B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ACC.NS trades at ₹1,619.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ACC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ACC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ACC.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACC.BO has a market cap of 304B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ACC.BO trades at ₹1,619.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ACC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ACC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ACC.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.NS has a market cap of 271.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while RAMCOCEM.NS trades at ₹1,147.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas RAMCOCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 47.03. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to RAMCOCEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check RAMCOCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.BO has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while RAMCOCEM.BO trades at ₹1,146.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas RAMCOCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 47.10. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to RAMCOCEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check RAMCOCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JSWCEMENT.NS trades at ₹127.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JSWCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JSWCEMENT.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JSWCEMENT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JSWCEMENT.BO trades at ₹127.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JSWCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JSWCEMENT.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JSWCEMENT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INDIACEM.NS has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while INDIACEM.NS trades at ₹425.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas INDIACEM.NS's P/E ratio is -121.30. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to INDIACEM.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check INDIACEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INDIACEM.BO has a market cap of 131.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while INDIACEM.BO trades at ₹425.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas INDIACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -120.92. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to INDIACEM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check INDIACEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NUVOCO.NS has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NUVOCO.NS trades at ₹334.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NUVOCO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NUVOCO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NUVOCO.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NUVOCO.BO has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NUVOCO.BO trades at ₹334.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NUVOCO.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NUVOCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NUVOCO.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.BO has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JKLAKSHMI.BO trades at ₹720.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JKLAKSHMI.BO's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JKLAKSHMI.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.NS has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while JKLAKSHMI.NS trades at ₹719.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas JKLAKSHMI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check JKLAKSHMI.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STARCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while STARCEMENT.NS trades at ₹217.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas STARCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to STARCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to STARCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check STARCEMENT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STARCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while STARCEMENT.BO trades at ₹217.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas STARCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to STARCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to STARCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check STARCEMENT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.BO has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BIRLACORPN.BO trades at ₹1,000.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BIRLACORPN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BIRLACORPN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BIRLACORPN.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.NS has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BIRLACORPN.NS trades at ₹998.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BIRLACORPN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BIRLACORPN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BIRLACORPN.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while PRSMJOHNSN.NS trades at ₹125.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check PRSMJOHNSN.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while PRSMJOHNSN.BO trades at ₹125.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check PRSMJOHNSN.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while HEIDELBERG.BO trades at ₹167.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas HEIDELBERG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to HEIDELBERG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check HEIDELBERG.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.NS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while HEIDELBERG.NS trades at ₹167.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas HEIDELBERG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to HEIDELBERG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check HEIDELBERG.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ORIENTCEM.NS trades at ₹157.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ORIENTCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ORIENTCEM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ORIENTCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ORIENTCEM.BO trades at ₹157.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ORIENTCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ORIENTCEM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ORIENTCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAGCEM.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SAGCEM.BO trades at ₹195.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SAGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SAGCEM.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SAGCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAGCEM.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SAGCEM.NS trades at ₹194.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SAGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SAGCEM.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SAGCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while MANGLMCEM.NS trades at ₹885.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas MANGLMCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to MANGLMCEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check MANGLMCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while MANGLMCEM.BO trades at ₹884.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas MANGLMCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to MANGLMCEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check MANGLMCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EPACK.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while EPACK.NS trades at ₹251.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas EPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 58.80. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to EPACK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to EPACK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check EPACK.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KCP.BO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KCP.BO trades at ₹162.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KCP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KCP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KCP.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KCP.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KCP.NS trades at ₹161.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KCP.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KCP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KCP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KCP.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while UDAICEMENT.NS trades at ₹36.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas UDAICEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 201.28. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to UDAICEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check UDAICEMENT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while UDAICEMENT.BO trades at ₹36.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas UDAICEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 201.06. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to UDAICEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check UDAICEMENT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SANGHIIND.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SANGHIIND.BO trades at ₹61.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SANGHIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SANGHIIND.BO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SANGHIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SANGHIIND.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SANGHIIND.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SANGHIIND.NS trades at ₹61.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SANGHIIND.NS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SANGHIIND.NS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SANGHIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SANGHIIND.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while IFGLEXPOR.NS trades at ₹167.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas IFGLEXPOR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check IFGLEXPOR.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while IFGLEXPOR.BO trades at ₹167.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas IFGLEXPOR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check IFGLEXPOR.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SHREDIGCEM.NS trades at ₹71.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SHREDIGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SHREDIGCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SHREDIGCEM.BO trades at ₹71.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SHREDIGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SHREDIGCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DECCANCE.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while DECCANCE.BO trades at ₹712.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas DECCANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to DECCANCE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check DECCANCE.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DECCANCE.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while DECCANCE.NS trades at ₹709.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas DECCANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to DECCANCE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check DECCANCE.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while APOLLOPIPES.BO trades at ₹686.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas APOLLOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 46.89. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check APOLLOPIPES.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORIRAIL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ORIRAIL.BO trades at ₹133.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ORIRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ORIRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to ORIRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ORIRAIL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCLIND.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NCLIND.NS trades at ₹182.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NCLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NCLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to NCLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NCLIND.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NCLIND.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NCLIND.BO trades at ₹182.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NCLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NCLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to NCLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NCLIND.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SAURASHCEM.NS trades at ₹65.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SAURASHCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SAURASHCEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SAURASHCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SAURASHCEM.BO trades at ₹65.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SAURASHCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SAURASHCEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SAURASHCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHIVACEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SHIVACEM.BO trades at ₹18.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SHIVACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SHIVACEM.BO's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHIVACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SHIVACEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACL.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ACL.NS trades at ₹55.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ACL.NS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ACL.NS's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ACL.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ACL.BO trades at ₹54.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ACL.BO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ACL.BO's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ACL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GSLSU.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GSLSU.BO trades at ₹91.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GSLSU.BO's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GSLSU.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to GSLSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GSLSU.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GSLSU.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GSLSU.NS trades at ₹90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GSLSU.NS's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GSLSU.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to GSLSU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GSLSU.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZODIAC.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ZODIAC.BO trades at ₹248.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ZODIAC.BO's P/E ratio is -59.01. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ZODIAC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ZODIAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ZODIAC.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZODIAC.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ZODIAC.NS trades at ₹246.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ZODIAC.NS's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ZODIAC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to ZODIAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ZODIAC.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, APCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while APCL.NS trades at ₹126.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas APCL.NS's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to APCL.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to APCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check APCL.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, APCL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while APCL.BO trades at ₹126.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas APCL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to APCL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to APCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check APCL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVKAR.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NAVKAR.BO trades at ₹14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NAVKAR.BO's P/E ratio is 145.10. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NAVKAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to NAVKAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NAVKAR.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GSCLCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GSCLCEMENT.NS trades at ₹33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GSCLCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -87.37. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GSCLCEMENT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SKCIL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SKCIL.BO trades at ₹163.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SKCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 8155.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SKCIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SKCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SKCIL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KESORAMIND.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KESORAMIND.BO trades at ₹8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KESORAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KESORAMIND.BO's ROE of +18.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KESORAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KESORAMIND.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SAHYADRI.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while SAHYADRI.NS trades at ₹253.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas SAHYADRI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to SAHYADRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAHYADRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check SAHYADRI.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASIIL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ASIIL.BO trades at ₹27.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ASIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ASIIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ASIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ASIIL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLITTEKG.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while GLITTEKG.BO trades at ₹69.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas GLITTEKG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to GLITTEKG.BO's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to GLITTEKG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check GLITTEKG.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVKARURB.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NAVKARURB.BO trades at ₹1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NAVKARURB.BO's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NAVKARURB.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to NAVKARURB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NAVKARURB.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVKARURB.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NAVKARURB.NS trades at ₹1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NAVKARURB.NS's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NAVKARURB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to NAVKARURB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NAVKARURB.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BRPL.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BRPL.BO trades at ₹119.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BRPL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to BRPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BRPL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KEIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KEIL.BO trades at ₹16.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KEIL.BO's P/E ratio is -1611.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KEIL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KEIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KEIL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while TRL.BO trades at ₹108.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas TRL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.51. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to TRL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to TRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check TRL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PANCM.BO has a market cap of 987M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while PANCM.BO trades at ₹123.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas PANCM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to PANCM.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to PANCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check PANCM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RISHILASE.BO has a market cap of 984.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while RISHILASE.BO trades at ₹107.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas RISHILASE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to RISHILASE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to RISHILASE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check RISHILASE.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BVCL.BO has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BVCL.BO trades at ₹42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BVCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4240.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BVCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to BVCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BVCL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PACIFICI.BO has a market cap of 937.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while PACIFICI.BO trades at ₹136.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas PACIFICI.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to PACIFICI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to PACIFICI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check PACIFICI.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BVCL.NS has a market cap of 931.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BVCL.NS trades at ₹42.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BVCL.NS's P/E ratio is 4205.00. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BVCL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to BVCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BVCL.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAKATCEM.BO has a market cap of 881.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KAKATCEM.BO trades at ₹113.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KAKATCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KAKATCEM.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KAKATCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KAKATCEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAKATCEM.NS has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KAKATCEM.NS trades at ₹113.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KAKATCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KAKATCEM.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KAKATCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KAKATCEM.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELEMARB.BO has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ELEMARB.BO trades at ₹202.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ELEMARB.BO's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ELEMARB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ELEMARB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ELEMARB.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NILACHAL.BO has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while NILACHAL.BO trades at ₹35.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas NILACHAL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to NILACHAL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to NILACHAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check NILACHAL.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AHMDSTE.BO has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while AHMDSTE.BO trades at ₹171.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas AHMDSTE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to AHMDSTE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to AHMDSTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check AHMDSTE.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CEETAIN.BO has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while CEETAIN.BO trades at ₹46.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas CEETAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 203.87. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to CEETAIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to CEETAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check CEETAIN.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RESTILE.BO has a market cap of 622.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while RESTILE.BO trades at ₹6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas RESTILE.BO's P/E ratio is -90.43. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to RESTILE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to RESTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check RESTILE.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BURNPUR.NS has a market cap of 568.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BURNPUR.NS trades at ₹33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BURNPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BURNPUR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to BURNPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BURNPUR.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BHEEMACEM.BO has a market cap of 526.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while BHEEMACEM.BO trades at ₹16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas BHEEMACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to BHEEMACEM.BO's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to BHEEMACEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check BHEEMACEM.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DIVSHKT.BO has a market cap of 519.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while DIVSHKT.BO trades at ₹50.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas DIVSHKT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to DIVSHKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to DIVSHKT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check DIVSHKT.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ANDHRACEMT.NS has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ANDHRACEMT.NS trades at ₹4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ANDHRACEMT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ANDHRACEMT.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRACEMT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ANDHRACEMT.NS's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KEERTHI.BO has a market cap of 449.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while KEERTHI.BO trades at ₹56.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas KEERTHI.BO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to KEERTHI.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to KEERTHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check KEERTHI.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZWELCAST.BO has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while ZWELCAST.BO trades at ₹695.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas ZWELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to ZWELCAST.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to ZWELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check ZWELCAST.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAYUKH.BO has a market cap of 432M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while MAYUKH.BO trades at ₹2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas MAYUKH.BO's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to MAYUKH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAYUKH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check MAYUKH.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRATIK.BO has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while PRATIK.BO trades at ₹6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas PRATIK.BO's P/E ratio is 51.69. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to PRATIK.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to PRATIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check PRATIK.BO's competition here

KESORAMIND.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KESORAMIND.NS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RALEGRA.BO has a market cap of 416.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KESORAMIND.NS is priced at ₹8.97, while RALEGRA.BO trades at ₹39.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KESORAMIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.97, whereas RALEGRA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KESORAMIND.NS's ROE is +18.55%, compared to RALEGRA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KESORAMIND.NS is less volatile compared to RALEGRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KESORAMIND.NS.Check RALEGRA.BO's competition here