K.C.P. Sugar and Industries Corporation Limited
K.C.P. Sugar and Industries Corporation Limited (KCPSUGIND.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KCPSUGIND.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCPSUGIND.NS | ₹22.27 | +0.36% | 2.5B | 61.86 | ₹0.36 | +0.45% |
| EIDPARRY.NS | ₹867.00 | -2.06% | 154.2B | 12.98 | ₹66.78 | N/A |
| BALRAMCHIN.NS | ₹456.95 | -1.63% | 92.3B | 20.69 | ₹22.09 | +0.77% |
| BALRAMCHIN.BO | ₹456.70 | -1.59% | 92.2B | 22.82 | ₹20.01 | +0.77% |
| TRIVENI.BO | ₹380.70 | -0.25% | 83.3B | 27.17 | ₹14.01 | +1.05% |
| TRIVENI.NS | ₹380.00 | -0.47% | 83.2B | 27.14 | ₹14.00 | +1.05% |
| RENUKA.BO | ₹23.23 | -1.11% | 49.4B | -6.64 | -₹3.50 | N/A |
| RENUKA.NS | ₹23.23 | -1.27% | 49.4B | -8.54 | -₹2.72 | N/A |
| BANARISUG.BO | ₹3,612.50 | +0.01% | 45.3B | 37.12 | ₹97.32 | +0.35% |
| BANARISUG.NS | ₹3,608.40 | +0.16% | 45.2B | 32.01 | ₹112.71 | +0.35% |
Stock Comparison
KCPSUGIND.NS vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 154.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹867.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BALRAMCHIN.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.NS has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BALRAMCHIN.NS trades at ₹456.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BALRAMCHIN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BALRAMCHIN.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BALRAMCHIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALRAMCHIN.BO has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BALRAMCHIN.BO trades at ₹456.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BALRAMCHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BALRAMCHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BALRAMCHIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TRIVENI.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRIVENI.BO has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TRIVENI.BO trades at ₹380.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TRIVENI.BO's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRIVENI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to TRIVENI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TRIVENI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TRIVENI.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRIVENI.NS has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TRIVENI.NS trades at ₹380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TRIVENI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRIVENI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to TRIVENI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TRIVENI.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RENUKA.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RENUKA.BO has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RENUKA.BO trades at ₹23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RENUKA.BO's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RENUKA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to RENUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RENUKA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RENUKA.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RENUKA.NS has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RENUKA.NS trades at ₹23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RENUKA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RENUKA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to RENUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RENUKA.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BANARISUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BANARISUG.BO has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BANARISUG.BO trades at ₹3,612.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BANARISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BANARISUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BANARISUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BANARISUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BANARISUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BANARISUG.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BANARISUG.NS trades at ₹3,608.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BANARISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BANARISUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BANARISUG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BANARISUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DALMIASUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DALMIASUG.NS trades at ₹282.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DALMIASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DALMIASUG.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DALMIASUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DALMIASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DALMIASUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DALMIASUG.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DALMIASUG.BO trades at ₹281.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DALMIASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DALMIASUG.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to DALMIASUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DALMIASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BAJAJHIND.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BAJAJHIND.NS trades at ₹15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BAJAJHIND.NS's P/E ratio is -43.54. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJAJHIND.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BAJAJHIND.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BAJAJHIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAJAJHIND.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BAJAJHIND.BO trades at ₹15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BAJAJHIND.BO's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAJAJHIND.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJHIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BAJAJHIND.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs LOTUSCHO.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LOTUSCHO.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while LOTUSCHO.BO trades at ₹762.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas LOTUSCHO.BO's P/E ratio is 164.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOTUSCHO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSCHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check LOTUSCHO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs VADILENT.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VADILENT.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while VADILENT.BO trades at ₹10,053.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas VADILENT.BO's P/E ratio is 145.72. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VADILENT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to VADILENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check VADILENT.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs NITTAGELA.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NITTAGELA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while NITTAGELA.BO trades at ₹838.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas NITTAGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NITTAGELA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to NITTAGELA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check NITTAGELA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs UTTAMSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while UTTAMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check UTTAMSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs UTTAMSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UTTAMSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while UTTAMSUGAR.NS trades at ₹193.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas UTTAMSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to UTTAMSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check UTTAMSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DHAMPURSUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DHAMPURSUG.NS trades at ₹113.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DHAMPURSUG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DHAMPURSUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DHAMPURSUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHAMPURSUG.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DHAMPURSUG.BO trades at ₹113.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DHAMPURSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DHAMPURSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DHAMPURSUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DWARKESH.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DWARKESH.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DWARKESH.BO trades at ₹35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DWARKESH.BO's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DWARKESH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to DWARKESH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DWARKESH.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DWARKESH.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DWARKESH.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DWARKESH.NS trades at ₹35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DWARKESH.NS's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DWARKESH.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DWARKESH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DWARKESH.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs AVADHSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while AVADHSUGAR.NS trades at ₹323.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas AVADHSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check AVADHSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs AVADHSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AVADHSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while AVADHSUGAR.BO trades at ₹322.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas AVADHSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to AVADHSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check AVADHSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MAGADSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAGADSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MAGADSUGAR.BO trades at ₹433.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MAGADSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAGADSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAGADSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MAGADSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MAGADSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAGADSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MAGADSUGAR.NS trades at ₹429.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MAGADSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAGADSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MAGADSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DAVANGERE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DAVANGERE.BO trades at ₹4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DAVANGERE.BO's P/E ratio is 86.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAVANGERE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DAVANGERE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DAVANGERE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DAVANGERE.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DAVANGERE.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DAVANGERE.NS trades at ₹4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DAVANGERE.NS's P/E ratio is 85.80. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAVANGERE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DAVANGERE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DAVANGERE.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs UGARSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while UGARSUGAR.BO trades at ₹35.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas UGARSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGARSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check UGARSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs UGARSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UGARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while UGARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas UGARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UGARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to UGARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check UGARSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MAWANASUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MAWANASUG.BO trades at ₹77.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MAWANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAWANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAWANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MAWANASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MAWANASUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAWANASUG.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MAWANASUG.NS trades at ₹77.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MAWANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAWANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to MAWANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MAWANASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DCMSRIND.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DCMSRIND.NS trades at ₹35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DCMSRIND.NS's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCMSRIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DCMSRIND.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DCMSRIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DCMSRIND.BO trades at ₹34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DCMSRIND.BO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCMSRIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DCMSRIND.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TIERRA.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIERRA.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TIERRA.BO trades at ₹41.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TIERRA.BO's P/E ratio is -30.85. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIERRA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to TIERRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TIERRA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KCPSUGIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KCPSUGIND.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KCPSUGIND.BO trades at ₹22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KCPSUGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 61.86. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KCPSUGIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KCPSUGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KCPSUGIND.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs PONNIERODE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while PONNIERODE.BO trades at ₹265.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas PONNIERODE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PONNIERODE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to PONNIERODE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check PONNIERODE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs PONNIERODE.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PONNIERODE.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while PONNIERODE.NS trades at ₹264.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas PONNIERODE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PONNIERODE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to PONNIERODE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check PONNIERODE.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KMSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KMSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KMSUGAR.BO trades at ₹24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KMSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KMSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KMSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KMSUGAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KMSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KMSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KMSUGAR.NS trades at ₹24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KMSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KMSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KMSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KMSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SHAWGELTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHAWGELTIN.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SHAWGELTIN.BO trades at ₹365.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SHAWGELTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SHAWGELTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SHAWGELTIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs IWP.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IWP.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while IWP.BO trades at ₹32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas IWP.BO's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IWP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to IWP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check IWP.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KOTARISUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KOTARISUG.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KOTARISUG.NS trades at ₹24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KOTARISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOTARISUG.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KOTARISUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KOTARISUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs AJANTSOY.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AJANTSOY.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while AJANTSOY.BO trades at ₹23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas AJANTSOY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJANTSOY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to AJANTSOY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check AJANTSOY.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SAKHTISUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAKHTISUG.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SAKHTISUG.NS trades at ₹15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SAKHTISUG.NS's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAKHTISUG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SAKHTISUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SAKHTISUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SAKHTISUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAKHTISUG.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SAKHTISUG.BO trades at ₹15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SAKHTISUG.BO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAKHTISUG.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SAKHTISUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SAKHTISUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SAMPRE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAMPRE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SAMPRE.BO trades at ₹21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SAMPRE.BO's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAMPRE.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SAMPRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SAMPRE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RANASUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RANASUG.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RANASUG.BO trades at ₹10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RANASUG.BO's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RANASUG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to RANASUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RANASUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs BAMBINO.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAMBINO.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while BAMBINO.BO trades at ₹208.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas BAMBINO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAMBINO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to BAMBINO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check BAMBINO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RANASUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RANASUG.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RANASUG.NS trades at ₹10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RANASUG.NS's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RANASUG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to RANASUG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RANASUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SHRIGANG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHRIGANG.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SHRIGANG.BO trades at ₹87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SHRIGANG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHRIGANG.BO's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIGANG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SHRIGANG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TIRUSTA.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIRUSTA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TIRUSTA.BO trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TIRUSTA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIRUSTA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUSTA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TIRUSTA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs OVOBELE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OVOBELE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while OVOBELE.BO trades at ₹153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas OVOBELE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OVOBELE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to OVOBELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check OVOBELE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MLKFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MLKFOOD.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MLKFOOD.BO trades at ₹52.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MLKFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLKFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to MLKFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MLKFOOD.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs VISHWARAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while VISHWARAJ.NS trades at ₹5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas VISHWARAJ.NS's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VISHWARAJ.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check VISHWARAJ.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs VISHWARAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VISHWARAJ.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while VISHWARAJ.BO trades at ₹5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas VISHWARAJ.BO's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VISHWARAJ.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to VISHWARAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check VISHWARAJ.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs NAPL.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAPL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while NAPL.BO trades at ₹214.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas NAPL.BO's P/E ratio is -285.60. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAPL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to NAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check NAPL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs GAYATRIBI.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GAYATRIBI.BO has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while GAYATRIBI.BO trades at ₹13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas GAYATRIBI.BO's P/E ratio is -122.82. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GAYATRIBI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to GAYATRIBI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check GAYATRIBI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KORE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KORE.BO has a market cap of 886.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KORE.BO trades at ₹34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KORE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KORE.BO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KORE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RAJSREESUG.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAJSREESUG.NS has a market cap of 864.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RAJSREESUG.NS trades at ₹26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RAJSREESUG.NS's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJSREESUG.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to RAJSREESUG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RAJSREESUG.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs RAJSREESUG.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAJSREESUG.BO has a market cap of 862.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while RAJSREESUG.BO trades at ₹26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas RAJSREESUG.BO's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJSREESUG.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to RAJSREESUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check RAJSREESUG.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs VASUPRADA.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VASUPRADA.BO has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while VASUPRADA.BO trades at ₹101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas VASUPRADA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VASUPRADA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to VASUPRADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check VASUPRADA.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs HFIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HFIL.BO has a market cap of 791.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while HFIL.BO trades at ₹9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas HFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HFIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to HFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check HFIL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs AMBOAGRI.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMBOAGRI.BO has a market cap of 634.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while AMBOAGRI.BO trades at ₹32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas AMBOAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMBOAGRI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to AMBOAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check AMBOAGRI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs KFBL.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KFBL.BO has a market cap of 629.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while KFBL.BO trades at ₹41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas KFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KFBL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to KFBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check KFBL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs UNIVSTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNIVSTAR.BO has a market cap of 587.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while UNIVSTAR.BO trades at ₹139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas UNIVSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNIVSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to UNIVSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check UNIVSTAR.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DILIGENT.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DILIGENT.BO has a market cap of 536.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DILIGENT.BO trades at ₹2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DILIGENT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DILIGENT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DILIGENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DILIGENT.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs FLEXFO.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLEXFO.BO has a market cap of 533.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while FLEXFO.BO trades at ₹42.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas FLEXFO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLEXFO.BO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to FLEXFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check FLEXFO.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs ANJANIFOODS.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANJANIFOODS.BO has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while ANJANIFOODS.BO trades at ₹19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas ANJANIFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 76.12. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to ANJANIFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check ANJANIFOODS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs PRUDMOULI.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PRUDMOULI.NS has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while PRUDMOULI.NS trades at ₹16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas PRUDMOULI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRUDMOULI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to PRUDMOULI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check PRUDMOULI.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SIMBHALS.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.NS has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SIMBHALS.NS trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SIMBHALS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIMBHALS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SIMBHALS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SIMBHALS.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SIMBHALS.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIMBHALS.BO has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SIMBHALS.BO trades at ₹8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SIMBHALS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIMBHALS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to SIMBHALS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SIMBHALS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SONALIS.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SONALIS.BO has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SONALIS.BO trades at ₹64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SONALIS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SONALIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to SONALIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SONALIS.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs DHARSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DHARSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while DHARSUGAR.NS trades at ₹8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas DHARSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHARSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to DHARSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check DHARSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs PRIMAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PRIMAIN.BO has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while PRIMAIN.BO trades at ₹18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas PRIMAIN.BO's P/E ratio is -209.78. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRIMAIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to PRIMAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check PRIMAIN.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs CHOTHANI.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHOTHANI.BO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while CHOTHANI.BO trades at ₹13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas CHOTHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 65.21. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOTHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to CHOTHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check CHOTHANI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TARAI.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TARAI.BO has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TARAI.BO trades at ₹7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TARAI.BO's P/E ratio is -59.75. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TARAI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to TARAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TARAI.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SHAHFOOD.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHAHFOOD.BO has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SHAHFOOD.BO trades at ₹154.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SHAHFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 140.32. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHAHFOOD.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to SHAHFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SHAHFOOD.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs CJGEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CJGEL.BO has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while CJGEL.BO trades at ₹18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas CJGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 79.13. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CJGEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to CJGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check CJGEL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs THIRUSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, THIRUSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while THIRUSUGAR.NS trades at ₹6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas THIRUSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to THIRUSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check THIRUSUGAR.NS's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs SUNRETAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUNRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while SUNRETAIL.BO trades at ₹0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas SUNRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to SUNRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check SUNRETAIL.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TRANSFD.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRANSFD.BO has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TRANSFD.BO trades at ₹447.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TRANSFD.BO's P/E ratio is -176.80. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRANSFD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSFD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TRANSFD.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs LONTE.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LONTE.BO has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while LONTE.BO trades at ₹14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas LONTE.BO's P/E ratio is -18.76. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LONTE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to LONTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check LONTE.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs TRICOMFRU.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRICOMFRU.BO has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while TRICOMFRU.BO trades at ₹2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas TRICOMFRU.BO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRICOMFRU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is less volatile compared to TRICOMFRU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check TRICOMFRU.BO's competition here
KCPSUGIND.NS vs MADHURIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KCPSUGIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCPSUGIND.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MADHURIND.BO has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCPSUGIND.NS is priced at ₹22.27, while MADHURIND.BO trades at ₹6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCPSUGIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.86, whereas MADHURIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, KCPSUGIND.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MADHURIND.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCPSUGIND.NS is more volatile compared to MADHURIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCPSUGIND.NS.Check MADHURIND.BO's competition here