Kimberly-Clark de México, S. A. B. de C. V.
Kimberly-Clark de México, S. A. B. de C. V. (KCDMY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KCDMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCDMY | $9.28 | -2.93% | 5.5B | 14.47 | $0.64 | +5.44% |
| LRLCF | $431.92 | -0.34% | 236.8B | 31.86 | $13.91 | +1.80% |
| LRLCY | $87.99 | +0.11% | 236.4B | 31.61 | $2.80 | +1.80% |
| UNLYF | $59.70 | -5.10% | 146.5B | 22.44 | $2.66 | +3.24% |
| RBGLY | $15.14 | +0.40% | 51.4B | 30.28 | $0.50 | +3.46% |
| RBGPF | $73.88 | -1.49% | 50.2B | 26.87 | $2.75 | +3.55% |
| HENOF | $79.00 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 14.08 | $5.61 | +2.93% |
| HENOY | $20.14 | -0.64% | 31.8B | 14.39 | $1.40 | +2.87% |
| HENKY | $18.54 | -0.59% | 31.7B | 13.21 | $1.40 | +3.09% |
| HELKF | $70.90 | +0.00% | 30.7B | 12.64 | $5.61 | +3.23% |
Stock Comparison
KCDMY vs LRLCF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while LRLCF trades at $431.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check LRLCF's competition here
KCDMY vs LRLCY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while LRLCY trades at $87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check LRLCY's competition here
KCDMY vs UNLYF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNLYF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNLYF's competition here
KCDMY vs RBGLY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while RBGLY trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check RBGLY's competition here
KCDMY vs RBGPF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while RBGPF trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check RBGPF's competition here
KCDMY vs HENOF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HENOF trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HENOF's competition here
KCDMY vs HENOY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HENOY trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HENOY's competition here
KCDMY vs HENKY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HENKY trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HENKY's competition here
KCDMY vs HELKF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HELKF trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HELKF's competition here
KCDMY vs BDRFY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BDRFY trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BDRFY's competition here
KCDMY vs BDRFF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BDRFF trades at $128.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BDRFF's competition here
KCDMY vs KAOOY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KAOOY trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KAOOY's competition here
KCDMY vs KAOCF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KAOCF trades at $47.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KAOCF's competition here
KCDMY vs ETTYF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while ETTYF trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check ETTYF's competition here
KCDMY vs UNICY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNICY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNICY's competition here
KCDMY vs UNCHF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNCHF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNCHF's competition here
KCDMY vs SSDOF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SSDOF trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -259.57. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SSDOF's competition here
KCDMY vs LCCTF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check LCCTF's competition here
KCDMY vs SSDOY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SSDOY trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -231.86. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SSDOY's competition here
KCDMY vs KCDMF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KCDMF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KCDMF's competition here
KCDMY vs BICEY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BICEY trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BICEY's competition here
KCDMY vs NTCOY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NTCOY's competition here
KCDMY vs UNLRY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNLRY trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNLRY's competition here
KCDMY vs VDAHF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check VDAHF's competition here
KCDMY vs HEGIY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HEGIY trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HEGIY's competition here
KCDMY vs UNLRF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNLRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNLRF's competition here
KCDMY vs RPHCF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while RPHCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check RPHCF's competition here
KCDMY vs VDAHY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check VDAHY's competition here
KCDMY vs KBYPF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KBYPF's competition here
KCDMY vs HEGIF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HEGIF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HEGIF's competition here
KCDMY vs BICEF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BICEF trades at $62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BICEF's competition here
KCDMY vs KOSCF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 65.23. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KOSCF's competition here
KCDMY vs LIOPF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check LIOPF's competition here
KCDMY vs BLUMY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BLUMY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BLUMY's competition here
KCDMY vs FACYF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while FACYF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check FACYF's competition here
KCDMY vs LIOPY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while LIOPY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check LIOPY's competition here
KCDMY vs PORBF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PORBF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PORBF's competition here
KCDMY vs KSRYY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KSRYY trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KSRYY's competition here
KCDMY vs MIOFF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MIOFF's competition here
KCDMY vs ONXYY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while ONXYY trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check ONXYY's competition here
KCDMY vs PIGEF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PIGEF's competition here
KCDMY vs PGENY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PGENY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PGENY's competition here
KCDMY vs SRTSF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SRTSF's competition here
KCDMY vs OLVI Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 834.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while OLVI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check OLVI's competition here
KCDMY vs DUNIY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check DUNIY's competition here
KCDMY vs ONXXF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 608.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while ONXXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check ONXXF's competition here
KCDMY vs MDOMF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MDOMF's competition here
KCDMY vs WPNTF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check WPNTF's competition here
KCDMY vs YAMNF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check YAMNF's competition here
KCDMY vs PZCUY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PZCUY's competition here
KCDMY vs MCBRF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MCBRF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MCBRF's competition here
KCDMY vs KITAF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KITAF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KITAF's competition here
KCDMY vs NBBTF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NBBTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NBBTF's competition here
KCDMY vs UNHLF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while UNHLF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check UNHLF's competition here
KCDMY vs RVIV Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while RVIV trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check RVIV's competition here
KCDMY vs KPTSF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KPTSF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KPTSF's competition here
KCDMY vs PURE Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PURE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PURE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PURE's competition here
KCDMY vs FDOGF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check FDOGF's competition here
KCDMY vs ZOONF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check ZOONF's competition here
KCDMY vs MIMNF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MIMNF's competition here
KCDMY vs PRFUF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PRFUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PRFUF's competition here
KCDMY vs CAWW Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while CAWW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check CAWW's competition here
KCDMY vs MAVBF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MAVBF's competition here
KCDMY vs DQWS Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while DQWS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to DQWS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check DQWS's competition here
KCDMY vs REVRQ Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check REVRQ's competition here
KCDMY vs SPCO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SPCO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SPCO's competition here
KCDMY vs NUVI Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NUVI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NUVI's competition here
KCDMY vs CLGOF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while CLGOF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check CLGOF's competition here
KCDMY vs SNBH Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SNBH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SNBH's competition here
KCDMY vs SKVI Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SKVI trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SKVI's competition here
KCDMY vs SLGD Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SLGD trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SLGD's ROE of +4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SLGD's competition here
KCDMY vs NASO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 748.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NASO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NASO's competition here
KCDMY vs WNBD Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 700K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while WNBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check WNBD's competition here
KCDMY vs PHLI Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PHLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PHLI's competition here
KCDMY vs HRSR Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HRSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HRSR's competition here
KCDMY vs TVOG Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while TVOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check TVOG's competition here
KCDMY vs EESO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while EESO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check EESO's competition here
KCDMY vs BRSHF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 67K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BRSHF's competition here
KCDMY vs EOSS Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while EOSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check EOSS's competition here
KCDMY vs QNTA Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while QNTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check QNTA's competition here
KCDMY vs SYHO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SYHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SYHO's competition here
KCDMY vs GRBG Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 39K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while GRBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check GRBG's competition here
KCDMY vs JOEY Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while JOEY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check JOEY's competition here
KCDMY vs PYCT Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 27.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PYCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PYCT's competition here
KCDMY vs SNST Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SNST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SNST's competition here
KCDMY vs INBI Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while INBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check INBI's competition here
KCDMY vs HPTN Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while HPTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check HPTN's competition here
KCDMY vs GYSN Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 14K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while GYSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check GYSN's competition here
KCDMY vs KPOC Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while KPOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check KPOC's competition here
KCDMY vs ZRVT Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while ZRVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check ZRVT's competition here
KCDMY vs NUUU Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NUUU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NUUU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NUUU's competition here
KCDMY vs EMPO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while EMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to EMPO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check EMPO's competition here
KCDMY vs BEUT Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BEUT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BEUT's competition here
KCDMY vs NCDP Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while NCDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check NCDP's competition here
KCDMY vs MDAV Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while MDAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to MDAV's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check MDAV's competition here
KCDMY vs PCGR Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while PCGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check PCGR's competition here
KCDMY vs RBCL Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while RBCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check RBCL's competition here
KCDMY vs SOYO Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while SOYO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check SOYO's competition here
KCDMY vs BWXXF Comparison July 2025
KCDMY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCDMY stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BWXXF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KCDMY is priced at $9.28, while BWXXF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCDMY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BWXXF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, KCDMY's ROE is +1.40%, compared to BWXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCDMY is more volatile compared to BWXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCDMY.Check BWXXF's competition here