Kutcho Copper Corp.
Kutcho Copper Corp. KCCFF Peers
See (KCCFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCCFF | $0.10 | -0.29% | 17.6M | -10.47 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.83 | -1.33% | 126B | 11.08 | $2.24 | +5.06% |
| RTPPF | $62.00 | N/A | 105.8B | 8.77 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| RTNTF | $75.25 | N/A | 105.2B | 10.64 | $7.07 | +3.12% |
| GLCNF | $3.67 | -0.81% | 44.1B | -28.23 | -$0.13 | +3.13% |
| GLNCY | $7.31 | -1.08% | 43.9B | -28.12 | -$0.26 | +2.95% |
| GMBXF | $5.53 | +0.40% | 43.1B | 12.02 | $0.46 | +4.49% |
| AAUKF | $30.28 | N/A | 36.7B | -11.97 | -$2.53 | +2.10% |
| NGLOY | $14.65 | -2.87% | 35.6B | -11.54 | -$1.27 | +2.18% |
| FSUMF | $10.50 | -0.94% | 32.3B | 8.33 | $1.26 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
KCCFF vs BHPLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BHPLF trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs RTPPF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while RTPPF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs RTNTF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while RTNTF trades at $75.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs GLCNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while GLCNF trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.23. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs GLNCY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while GLNCY trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs GMBXF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while GMBXF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AAUKF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AAUKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs NGLOY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while NGLOY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FSUMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FSUMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FSUGY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FSUGY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs CMCLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while CMCLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs TCKRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs IVPAF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while IVPAF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs BOLIF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs BDNNY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BDNNY trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs JXMNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SHTLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs IPOAF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while IPOAF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ABML Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs STMNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SMMYY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SMMYY trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PUTKF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PUTKY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PUTKY trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LYSDY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LYSDY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 128.38. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LYSCF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LYSCF trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 171.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs NILSY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PAEKY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MALRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MALRY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MALRY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FLMMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PILBF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PILBF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -85.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs CHZQ Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs NGXXF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while NGXXF trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -39.68. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PTNDY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MIMTF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MIMTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs IPGDF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while IPGDF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PTNDF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AZZVF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AFBOF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs DWMNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs IIDDY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs NICMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while NICMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SOUHY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SOUHY trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.73. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ERMAY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ERMAF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs DETRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ILKAY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ADTLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ADTLF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ADMLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ADMLF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AZRMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs BQSSF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BQSSF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -66.25. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ILKAF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FMCXF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 944.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FMCXF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs STTSY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LINRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 907.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LINRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ATUSF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ATUSF trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AFMJF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 880.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AFMJF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AUSDF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs TAOFF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while TAOFF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AMVMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PXMFF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 619.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PXMFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MFRVF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs VULNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs CTJHF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ALMTF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ALMTF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PKREF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MJDLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MJDLF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs TTNNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs OSTTF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MCRZF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs BIRNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MCHHF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FGOVF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 396.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FGOVF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MNXMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.37. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs NQMIY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs REEMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while REEMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs CTJHY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ERLFF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 344.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ERLFF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.19. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs KMRPF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs JMXXF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while JMXXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MLYF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 330.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs AUMTF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LTSRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SLGGF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs MLXEF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ARAFF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs CGMLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while CGMLF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SVMLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs ERDCF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while ERDCF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs FWEDF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while FWEDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LRSRF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs STQNF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PMETF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PMETF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SRHYY Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs RXRLF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs LTHHF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs BSRUF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs SRAFF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, SRAFF has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while SRAFF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas SRAFF's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRAFF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to SRAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.
KCCFF vs PTTMF Comparison
KCCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCCFF stands at 17.6M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KCCFF is priced at $0.10, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -10.47, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, KCCFF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KCCFF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCCFF.