JX Luxventure Limited
JX Luxventure Limited KBSF Peers
See (KBSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBSF | $3.05 | +1.67% | 0 | -1.46 | -$2.09 | N/A |
| RL | $288.76 | -0.25% | 17.5B | 24.88 | $11.61 | +1.17% |
| LEVI | $20.74 | -0.81% | 8.2B | 19.76 | $1.05 | +3.09% |
| GIL | $51.61 | -1.51% | 7.8B | 20.24 | $2.55 | +1.67% |
| VFC | $12.45 | +1.55% | 4.9B | 69.19 | $0.18 | +3.63% |
| PVH | $73.27 | +2.63% | 3.5B | 10.34 | $7.09 | +0.26% |
| KTB | $63.03 | -1.55% | 3.5B | 15.48 | $4.07 | +3.26% |
| COLM | $59.88 | +0.45% | 3.3B | 15.51 | $3.86 | +2.00% |
| UAA | $6.98 | +1.75% | 2.9B | -14.86 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.60 | +2.17% | 2.9B | -14.03 | -$0.47 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KBSF vs RL Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while RL trades at $288.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs LEVI Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while LEVI trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs GIL Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while GIL trades at $51.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs VFC Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while VFC trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 69.19. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs PVH Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while PVH trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs KTB Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while KTB trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs COLM Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while COLM trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs UAA Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while UAA trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs UA Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while UA trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -14.03. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs ZGN Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while ZGN trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs AIN Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while AIN trades at $69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs HBI Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while HBI trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs GOOS Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while GOOS trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs GIII Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while GIII trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs FIGS Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 981.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while FIGS trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 604.00. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs OXM Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 620.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while OXM trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs SGC Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while SGC trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs LAKE Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 134.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while LAKE trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs UFI Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while UFI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs CULP Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while CULP trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs JRSH Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while JRSH trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -48.14. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs JL Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while JL trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs VNCE Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while VNCE trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs PMNT Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while PMNT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs LLL Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs NCI Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while NCI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs DXYN Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while DXYN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs JXJT Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is more volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs DLA Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs XELB Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while XELB trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs EVK Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.
KBSF vs SQBG Comparison
KBSF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBSF stands at 0. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KBSF is priced at $3.05, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBSF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.46, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KBSF's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KBSF is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBSF.