Jupiter Wellness, Inc.
Jupiter Wellness, Inc. JUPWW Peers
See (JUPWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUPWW | $0.32 | -20.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZTS | $158.98 | +1.94% | 70.9B | 28.63 | $5.56 | +1.17% |
| TAK | $15.44 | -0.16% | 48.4B | 66.80 | $0.23 | +3.83% |
| HLN | $10.23 | -1.30% | 46.6B | 24.08 | $0.43 | +1.13% |
| TEVA | $16.97 | +1.22% | 19.1B | -14.48 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | +0.00% | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| NBIX | $129.03 | +2.66% | 12.7B | 43.41 | $2.95 | N/A |
| RDY | $14.87 | -1.10% | 12.4B | 19.13 | $0.78 | +0.64% |
| CTLT | $63.48 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $9.28 | +3.92% | 10.8B | -2.89 | -$3.18 | +5.26% |
Stock Comparison
JUPWW vs ZTS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ZTS trades at $158.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TAK Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TAK trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 66.80. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs HLN Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while HLN trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TEVA Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TEVA trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ITCI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs NBIX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while NBIX trades at $129.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs RDY Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while RDY trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CTLT Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs VTRS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while VTRS trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs RGC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while RGC trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -1460.00. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ELAN Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ELAN trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs LNTH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while LNTH trades at $79.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AMRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AMRX trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -205.25. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PRGO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PRGO trades at $27.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ALVOW Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ALVOW trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ALVO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ALVO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs HCM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while HCM trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 77.05. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs BHC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while BHC trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -56.62. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs DCPH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EMBCV Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs BGM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while BGM trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -51.60. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs INDV Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while INDV trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -293.20. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SUPN Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SUPN trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TARO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EVO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EVO trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ANIP Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ANIP trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -53.86. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs DVAX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while DVAX trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs HROW Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while HROW trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -50.44. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AMPH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AMPH trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PAHC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PAHC trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PCRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PCRX trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs COLL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while COLL trades at $30.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PETQ Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AVDL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 853.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AVDL trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -33.88. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CRON Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 740M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CRON trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EMBC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 599.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EMBC trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EOLS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EOLS trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs BDSI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ORGO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 479.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ORGO trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -23.62. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SIGA Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SIGA trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs KMDA Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 446.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while KMDA trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TLRY Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TLRY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EBS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EBS trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AQST Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AQST trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SNDL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SNDL trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ALIM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs LFCR Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 294.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while LFCR trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ZYBT Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ZYBT trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 102.83. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs LNDC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to LNDC's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TKNO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TKNO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ACB Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ACB trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ACB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CGC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CGC trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CGC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TYHT Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ESPR Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ESPR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs REPH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs OGI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while OGI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs DERM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 162.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while DERM trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -18.84. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs BIOA Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while BIOA trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SCTL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PROC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PROC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs IRWD Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while IRWD trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CRDL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CRDL trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs THTX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while THTX trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -32.86. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs OPTN Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ZOM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs GRVI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ZYNE Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs INCR Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while INCR trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SSIC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ASRT Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ASRT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs VLNS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs QNTM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while QNTM trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CPIX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CPIX trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SXTC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SXTC trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs JUPW Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -9.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs QLI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs HEXO Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs KALA Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while KALA trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs EGRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while EGRX trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs RMTI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while RMTI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -83.10. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SCYX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SCYX trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs CYTH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs DRRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while DRRX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs IXHL Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while IXHL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs GELS Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while GELS trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs PRPH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while PRPH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs ACRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AYTU Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AYTU trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AYTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs FLGC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while FLGC trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TXMD Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TXMD trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs COSM Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while COSM trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs AGRX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs SBFMW Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, SBFMW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while SBFMW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBFMW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to SBFMW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to SBFMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs TLPH Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while TLPH trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs IMCC Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, IMCC has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while IMCC trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMCC's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to IMCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to IMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs NLTX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs YCBD Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while YCBD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs LCI Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.
JUPWW vs BGXX Comparison
JUPWW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JUPWW stands at 0. In comparison, BGXX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JUPWW is priced at $0.32, while BGXX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JUPWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGXX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, JUPWW's ROE is -12.17%, compared to BGXX's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, JUPWW is more volatile compared to BGXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JUPWW.