China Finance Online Co. Limited

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS trades at $140.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 219.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PA trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PI trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 216.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS trades at $707.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 216.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PE trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 215.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PF trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 215.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PK trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 205.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS-PD trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS-PA trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS-PC trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SCHW trades at $91.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PQ trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PP trades at $25.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while TW trades at $146.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PL trades at $19.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while RJF trades at $153.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while LPLA trades at $374.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while IBKR trades at $55.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while NMR trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while HLI trades at $179.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while JEF trades at $54.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SF trades at $103.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SF-PB trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while EVR trades at $270.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while XP trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while FRHC trades at $146.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 101.39. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MKTX trades at $223.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while VIRT trades at $44.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MARA trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BGC trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while RJF-PB trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while PIPR trades at $277.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MC trades at $62.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while LAZ trades at $47.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SNEX trades at $91.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while PJT trades at $165.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while IREN trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -49.13. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MRX trades at $39.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SF-PC trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while FUTU trades at $123.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while HUT trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while CIFRW trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SF-PD trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while PWP trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -93.95. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BGCP trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while DFIN trades at $61.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while WULF trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while CIFR trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while TIGR trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while HKIB trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while COWN trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 799.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while AC trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while OPY trades at $65.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 554.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 553.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while AMRK trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while FUFU trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 326.00. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BTBT trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BITF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while HIVE trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -103.50. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BTM trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GHL trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SIEB trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SWIN trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while WHG trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 393.88. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while PROP trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while TCJH trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SRL trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while HGBL trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GRDI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GRYP trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while BTCS trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while TOP trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MDBH trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SDIG trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GSIW trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while PLUT trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while WAI trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while ARBK trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while COHN trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while NCPL trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GREE trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SAI trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while ABTS trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MIGI trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while ATIF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MEGL trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while SAITW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.

JRJC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JRJC stands at 0. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 757.2K. Regarding current trading prices, JRJC is priced at $3.99, while MFH trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JRJC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.73, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -53.50. In terms of profitability, JRJC's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JRJC is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JRJC.