iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) ISFA.AS Peers
See (ISFA.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISFA.AS | €10.05 | +0.33% | 14.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.52% |
| JPSR.AS | €23.35 | +2.34% | 798.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.04% |
| IWDA.AS | €100.37 | +0.85% | 92.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €99.88 | +0.74% | 55.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| VWRL.AS | €127.76 | +0.69% | 32.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.61% |
| SP5H.PA | €305.50 | +0.83% | 18.9B | 27.10 | €11.27 | +1.22% |
| SP5C.PA | €378.90 | +0.73% | 18.6B | 26.11 | €14.51 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €52.51 | +0.72% | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| AMUN.PA | €69.50 | +1.76% | 14.1B | 10.91 | €6.37 | +5.31% |
| HAL.AS | €121.80 | +1.16% | 11B | 9.10 | €13.39 | +2.38% |
Stock Comparison
ISFA.AS vs JPSR.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, JPSR.AS has a market cap of 798.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while JPSR.AS trades at €23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSR.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to JPSR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IWDA.AS trades at €100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while VUSA.AS trades at €99.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while VWRL.AS trades at €127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while SP5H.PA trades at €305.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while SP5C.PA trades at €378.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IUSA.AS trades at €52.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while AMUN.PA trades at €69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while HAL.AS trades at €121.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while SOF.BR trades at €283.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WLDH.PA trades at €219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CSH2.PA trades at €106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WLD.PA trades at €342.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MEUD.PA trades at €260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IMEU.AS trades at €34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while GBLB.BR trades at €72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 303.96. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs I500.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while I500.AS trades at €10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while I50D.AS trades at €6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while GOLD.PA trades at €110.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IWRD.AS trades at €72.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CC4.PA trades at €224.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs 500.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while 500.PA trades at €104.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while VHYL.AS trades at €63.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while AEME.PA trades at €69.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CW8.PA trades at €547.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IJPA.AS trades at €53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while PHAU.AS trades at €260.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs UST.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while UST.PA trades at €78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while S500H.PA trades at €86.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs S500.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while S500.PA trades at €149.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while VEUR.AS trades at €41.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while REINA.AS trades at €25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while KBCA.BR trades at €58.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs USA.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while USA.PA trades at €492.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EUEA.AS trades at €54.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs RF.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while RF.PA trades at €62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while 500X.AS trades at €37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while IEMM.AS trades at €40.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while USAC.PA trades at €533.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while C50U.PA trades at €162.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CAC.PA trades at €77.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CACC.PA trades at €37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ALLFG.AS trades at €6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -23.05. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MF.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MF.PA trades at €90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MSE.PA trades at €59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs C50.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while C50.PA trades at €138.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CD5.PA trades at €85.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ROLA.AS trades at €62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while BREB.BR trades at €117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while TKO.PA trades at €19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WESE.PA trades at €71.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while VERX.AS trades at €42.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CB3.PA trades at €221.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EEUE.PA trades at €16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ESE.PA trades at €26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EUSRI.PA trades at €85.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while TNOW.PA trades at €838.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EXCH.AS trades at €5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ANX.PA trades at €220.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while TDIV.AS trades at €42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs PABW.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while PABW.PA trades at €76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CMUD.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CMUD.PA trades at €66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ACWI.PA trades at €474.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while BNKE.PA trades at €242.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs PEUG.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while PEUG.PA trades at €73.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EGOV.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MUSD.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while PHAG.AS trades at €28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs GIMB.BR Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while GIMB.BR trades at €44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WAT.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WAT.PA trades at €67.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EMPA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MPAB.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while AASI.PA trades at €39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EGRI.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EGRI.PA trades at €45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while BNK.PA trades at €45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs INR.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while INR.PA trades at €29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs LWCR.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while LWCR.PA trades at €499.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs CG1.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while CG1.PA trades at €426.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs TFG.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while TFG.AS trades at €16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs EXA1.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while EXA1.AS trades at €12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs DAX.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while DAX.PA trades at €219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs WQDA.AS Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ESGH.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ESGH.PA trades at €25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs ESGE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while ESGE.PA trades at €34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.
ISFA.AS vs MTE.PA Comparison
ISFA.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ISFA.AS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ISFA.AS is priced at €10.05, while MTE.PA trades at €200.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ISFA.AS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ISFA.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ISFA.AS is more volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ISFA.AS.