Inter Pipeline Ltd.
Inter Pipeline Ltd. (IPL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPL.TO | CA$19.12 | +1.49% | 8.2B | 17.07 | CA$1.12 | +2.09% |
| ENB.TO | CA$75.40 | +1.15% | 164.5B | 23.42 | CA$3.22 | +5.05% |
| ENB-PT.TO | CA$23.45 | -0.21% | 147.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.05% |
| ENB-PA.TO | CA$24.40 | -0.20% | 142B | N/A | N/A | +5.05% |
| TRP.TO | CA$88.16 | +2.00% | 91.8B | 25.41 | CA$3.47 | +3.90% |
| ENB-PN.TO | CA$24.64 | +0.00% | 53.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.05% |
| ENB-PFA.TO | CA$23.09 | +0.13% | 50.4B | 8.01 | CA$2.88 | +5.05% |
| ENB-PFK.TO | CA$22.80 | +0.66% | 42.1B | 18.17 | CA$1.40 | +5.05% |
| PPL-PC.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.20% | 39.1B | 10.92 | CA$2.29 | +4.61% |
| PPL-PA.TO | CA$25.20 | +0.64% | 39.1B | 11.00 | CA$2.29 | +4.61% |
Stock Comparison
IPL.TO vs ENB.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB.TO has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB.TO trades at CA$75.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB.TO's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs ENB-PT.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PT.TO has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PT.TO trades at CA$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PT.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PT.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs ENB-PA.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PA.TO has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PA.TO trades at CA$24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PA.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PA.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs TRP.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRP.TO has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TRP.TO trades at CA$88.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TRP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to TRP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TRP.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs ENB-PN.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PN.TO has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PN.TO trades at CA$24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PN.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs ENB-PFA.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PFA.TO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PFA.TO trades at CA$23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PFA.TO's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PFA.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PFA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PFA.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs ENB-PFK.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PFK.TO has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PFK.TO trades at CA$22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PFK.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs PPL-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PC.TO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PC.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PC.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs PPL-PA.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PA.TO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PA.TO trades at CA$25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PA.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs PPL.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL.TO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL.TO trades at CA$62.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs PPL-PQ.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PQ.TO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PQ.TO trades at CA$25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PQ.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PQ.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs TRP-PD.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRP-PD.TO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TRP-PD.TO trades at CA$24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TRP-PD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRP-PD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to TRP-PD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TRP-PD.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs KEY.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KEY.TO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while KEY.TO trades at CA$53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas KEY.TO's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to KEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check KEY.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs GEI.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GEI.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while GEI.TO trades at CA$29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas GEI.TO's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEI.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to GEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check GEI.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs TPZ.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TPZ.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TPZ.TO trades at CA$31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TPZ.TO's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPZ.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to TPZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TPZ.TO's competition here
IPL.TO vs TWM.TO Comparison April 2026
IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TWM.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TWM.TO trades at CA$9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TWM.TO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWM.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is less volatile compared to TWM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TWM.TO's competition here