Inter Pipeline Ltd.

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PA.TO has a market cap of 137.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PA.TO trades at CA$24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PA.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PA.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB.TO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB.TO trades at CA$62.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB.TO's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PT.TO has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PT.TO trades at CA$23.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PT.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PT.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PN.TO has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PN.TO trades at CA$24.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to ENB-PN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PN.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TRP.TO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TRP.TO trades at CA$66.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TRP.TO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is less volatile compared to TRP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TRP.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ENB-PFA.TO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while ENB-PFA.TO trades at CA$22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas ENB-PFA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENB-PFA.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is less volatile compared to ENB-PFA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check ENB-PFA.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PA.TO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PA.TO trades at CA$24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PA.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PA.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PQ.TO has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PQ.TO trades at CA$25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PQ.TO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PQ.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PQ.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL-PC.TO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL-PC.TO trades at CA$24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL-PC.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL-PC.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PPL.TO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while PPL.TO trades at CA$51.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas PPL.TO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to PPL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check PPL.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KEY.TO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while KEY.TO trades at CA$43.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas KEY.TO's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEY.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to KEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check KEY.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GEI.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while GEI.TO trades at CA$24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas GEI.TO's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEI.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to GEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check GEI.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TPZ.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TPZ.TO trades at CA$25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TPZ.TO's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPZ.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is more volatile compared to TPZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TPZ.TO's competition here

IPL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IPL.TO stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TWM.TO has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.TO is priced at CA$19.12, while TWM.TO trades at CA$0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IPL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.07, whereas TWM.TO's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, IPL.TO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWM.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.TO is less volatile compared to TWM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.TO.Check TWM.TO's competition here