CoreCard Corporation
CoreCard Corporation INS Peers
See (INS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INS | $40.15 | -0.32% | 341.39M | 41.82 | $0.96 | N/A |
| SAP | $299.27 | +0.18% | 349.13B | 54.91 | $5.45 | +0.70% |
| CRM | $288.06 | +0.15% | 276.39B | 45.29 | $6.36 | +0.56% |
| NOW | $1,021.84 | -0.38% | 211.52B | 138.27 | $7.39 | N/A |
| UBER | $91.89 | -0.62% | 192.16B | 16.09 | $5.71 | N/A |
| INTU | $671.16 | +0.04% | 187.63B | 62.90 | $10.67 | +0.60% |
| SHOP | $106.15 | +4.34% | 137.45B | 68.48 | $1.55 | N/A |
| APP | $363.06 | -2.04% | 122.65B | 65.53 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $416.92 | +0.85% | 114.16B | -18.75 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $320.55 | +0.08% | 87.52B | 81.36 | $3.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INS vs SAP Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 349.13B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SAP trades at $299.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CRM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 276.39B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CRM trades at $288.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs NOW Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 211.52B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while NOW trades at $1,021.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 138.27. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs UBER Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 192.16B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while UBER trades at $91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs INTU Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 187.63B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while INTU trades at $671.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.90. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SHOP Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 137.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SHOP trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 68.48. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs APP Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 122.65B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while APP trades at $363.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.53. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs MSTR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 114.16B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while MSTR trades at $416.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CDNS Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 87.52B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CDNS trades at $320.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 81.36. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs WDAY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 73.29B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while WDAY trades at $273.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 141.15. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ADSK Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.29B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ADSK trades at $295.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 57.67. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SNOW Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 61.01B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SNOW trades at $182.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.37. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs TEAM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.47B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while TEAM trades at $214.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -129.21. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs FICO Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 49.34B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while FICO trades at $2,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 87.67. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DDOG Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.16B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DDOG trades at $116.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 247.43. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs TTD Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.89B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while TTD trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 94.01. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs HUBS Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 33.84B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while HUBS trades at $641.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1395.11. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ANSS Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.42B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ANSS trades at $346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ZM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.35B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ZM trades at $83.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs STRK Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while STRK trades at $99.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs TYL Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.76B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while TYL trades at $574.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.61. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INS and TYL have similar daily volatility (1.19).
INS vs STRF Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 24.04B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while STRF trades at $98.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DUOL Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.90B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DUOL trades at $525.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 261.56. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PTC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.78B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PTC trades at $173.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SSNC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.83B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SSNC trades at $80.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs GRAB Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.54B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while GRAB trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 494.00. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DOCU Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DOCU trades at $89.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs GWRE Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.06B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while GWRE trades at $215.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1076.50. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs AZPN Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DT trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs MNDY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.34B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while MNDY trades at $302.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 302.07. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PAYC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15.07B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PAYC trades at $260.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BSY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BSY trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.62. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BKI Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs MANH Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while MANH trades at $191.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs TTAN Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.49B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while TTAN trades at $126.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PCTY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PCTY trades at $200.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 50.14. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs XM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CDAY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs NICE Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.53B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while NICE trades at $166.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PCOR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.39B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PCOR trades at $69.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -80.97. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ESTC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.83B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ESTC trades at $94.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -71.89. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DSGX Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DSGX trades at $114.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 70.02. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs QXO Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while QXO trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -52.43. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DAY Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DAY trades at $58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 367.69. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs U Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while U trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PEGA Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PEGA trades at $103.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.82. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs GTLB Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.29B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while GTLB trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1254.00. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs NATI Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CVLT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.92B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CVLT trades at $179.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 107.49. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SMAR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs APPF Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.69B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while APPF trades at $213.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SRAD Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.38B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SRAD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 124.84. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs OTEX Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while OTEX trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs LYFT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while LYFT trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 110.20. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CWAN Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CWAN trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs VERX Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while VERX trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -133.59. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs COUP Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SYT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SYT trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BULL Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BULL trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs QTWO Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while QTWO trades at $89.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -264.59. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs IDCC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while IDCC trades at $215.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ETWO-WT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs FROG Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while FROG trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.34. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BILL Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BILL trades at $46.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2335.50. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs GRND Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while GRND trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.52. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs LIF Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while LIF trades at $60.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 468.38. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs INTA Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while INTA trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -238.00. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs FRSH Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while FRSH trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.42. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs RUMBW Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while RUMBW trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs RUM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while RUM trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ASAN Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ASAN trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CVT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PYCR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs SOUN Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while SOUN trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.34. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs WK Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while WK trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -61.12. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PWSC Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ZI Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BRZE Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BRZE trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -34.76. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs AYX Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ENV Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs INST Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BL Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BL trades at $55.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.17. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ZETA Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ZETA trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -54.60. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs RIOT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while RIOT trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs COMP Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while COMP trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -46.77. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ALKT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ALKT trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -83.11. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BLKB Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BLKB trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs BTDR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while BTDR trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CALX Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CALX trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -90.08. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ALIT Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ALIT trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.67. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs NCNO Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while NCNO trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -78.21. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs DAVEW Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while DAVEW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs GBTG Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while GBTG trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -61.10. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs ALRM Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while ALRM trades at $58.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs AGYS Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while AGYS trades at $101.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 135.16. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PAR Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PAR trades at $69.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.19. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs CLSK Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while CLSK trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.
INS vs PRGS Comparison
INS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INS stands at 341.39M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, INS is priced at $40.15, while PRGS trades at $63.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.82, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.72. In terms of profitability, INS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INS is less volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INS.