International Paper Company PFD $4
International Paper Company PFD $4 INPAP Peers
See (INPAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INPAP | $68.07 | N/A | 25.3B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | +3.38% |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| AMCCF | $9.19 | -7.23% | 21.2B | 16.41 | $0.56 | +5.56% |
| CCDBF | $58.11 | +0.29% | 10.2B | 16.60 | $3.50 | +1.47% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | +3.27% |
| CCLLF | $52.94 | +0.11% | 9.2B | 15.13 | $3.50 | +1.90% |
| SCBGF | $20.55 | N/A | 7.9B | 35.43 | $0.58 | +2.57% |
Stock Comparison
INPAP vs DSSMY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs NPKLY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs SMFTF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and SMFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SMFKY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs AMCCF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while AMCCF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and AMCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs CCDBF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while CCDBF trades at $58.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs DITHF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs CCLLF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while CCLLF trades at $52.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and CCLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SCBGF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SCBGF trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and SCBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SIGCY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SIGCY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs HOYFF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while HOYFF trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and HOYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs VDRFF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while VDRFF trades at $107.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs ORRYY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while ORRYY trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and ORRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs WIPKF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while WIPKF trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and WIPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs ORRAF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while ORRAF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and ORRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs MNHFF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and MNHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs FRFTF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs ELPKF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 807M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while ELPKF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs FUJSF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while FUJSF trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs PCTGY Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and PCTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs CADNF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 639.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while CADNF trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -210.67. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and CADNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs GRVWF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and GRVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs HXGCF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 396.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while HXGCF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and HXGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs JSPCF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and JSPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SNGSF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SNGSF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and SNGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SUMXF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SUMXF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to SUMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs VKSC Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while VKSC trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and VKSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs IFLXF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while IFLXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and IFLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs YIKWF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and YIKWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SPQDF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs NEXNF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while NEXNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs EPTI Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while EPTI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs IDND Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs MAYX Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while MAYX trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and MAYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs RDVA Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs GDNPF Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and GDNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs TZPC Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 65.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs ACGX Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 33.7K. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while ACGX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and ACGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs PGOG Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs ACTX Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and ACTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
INPAP vs SINC Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 36. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while SINC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP is less volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INPAP.
INPAP vs GPRC Comparison
INPAP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INPAP stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, INPAP is priced at $68.07, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INPAP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, INPAP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INPAP and GPRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).