Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. INN-PF Peers
See (INN-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INN-PF | $19.04 | +1.96% | 2.05B | -32.65 | -$0.58 | +6.87% |
| HST | $15.76 | +0.38% | 10.93B | 16.42 | $0.96 | +5.67% |
| RHP | $100.48 | -0.81% | 6.03B | 21.33 | $4.71 | +4.46% |
| DRH-PA | $25.14 | +0.24% | 5.19B | -226.49 | -$0.11 | +4.62% |
| SHO-PH | $21.31 | -0.35% | 4.28B | 57.59 | $0.37 | +3.95% |
| SHO-PI | $20.04 | -0.05% | 4.03B | 54.16 | $0.37 | +3.95% |
| APLE | $12.30 | +0.61% | 2.93B | 15.37 | $0.80 | +8.19% |
| PK | $11.18 | +0.04% | 2.23B | 18.94 | $0.59 | +12.45% |
| PEB-PG | $18.44 | +0.66% | 2.19B | -11.04 | -$1.67 | +0.38% |
| SHO | $10.54 | +1.84% | 2.12B | 75.29 | $0.14 | +3.95% |
Stock Comparison
INN-PF vs HST Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 10.93B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while HST trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RHP Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while RHP trades at $100.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs DRH-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while DRH-PA trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -226.49. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SHO-PH trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 57.59. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO-PI Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SHO-PI trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs APLE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while APLE trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PK Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PK trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PK's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PG Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PEB-PG trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SHO trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 75.29. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PEB-PH trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs DRH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while DRH trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 41.84. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PEB trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs XHR Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while XHR trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RLJ-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RLJ Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while RLJ trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PF Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PEB-PF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while PEB-PE trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CLDT-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.95M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.49M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PC Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.22M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs INN-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 549.93M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while INN-PE trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -33.42. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs INN Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 517.34M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while INN trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas INN's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.85M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SVC Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 379.93M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SVC trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CLDT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 357.59M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while CLDT trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 121.67. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 142.47M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while BHR trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 131.16M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while BHR-PD trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -66.76. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR-PB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while BHR-PB trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -46.11. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PG Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 37.53M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT-PG trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 36.28M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT-PH trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PF Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 35.66M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT-PF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 35.34M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PI Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 35.25M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT-PI trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 34.45M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while AHT-PD trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHOO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 31.97M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SOHOO trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -9.85. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHON Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 31.97M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SOHON trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHON's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHOB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 29.81M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SOHOB trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs IHT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 22.08M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while IHT trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 2.05B. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 16.00M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $19.04, while SOHO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -32.65, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.