Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. INN-PF Peers
See (INN-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INN-PF | $17.76 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -30.46 | -$0.58 | +6.12% |
| HST | $15.93 | +3.69% | 11B | 16.53 | $0.96 | +5.67% |
| RHP | $101.52 | +2.89% | 6.4B | 21.54 | $4.71 | +4.49% |
| DRH-PA | $24.80 | +1.33% | 5.1B | -222.47 | -$0.11 | +5.35% |
| SHO-PH | $20.44 | +1.59% | 4.1B | 55.35 | $0.37 | +4.04% |
| SHO-PI | $18.64 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 51.63 | $0.37 | +4.04% |
| APLE | $11.92 | +2.14% | 2.8B | 14.88 | $0.80 | +8.43% |
| PK | $10.65 | +4.11% | 2.1B | 18.05 | $0.59 | +13.13% |
| PEB-PG | $17.82 | +1.54% | 2.1B | -10.61 | -$1.67 | +0.38% |
| PEB-PH | $16.37 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -9.75 | -$1.67 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
INN-PF vs HST Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while HST trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RHP Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while RHP trades at $101.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs DRH-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while DRH-PA trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -222.47. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SHO-PH trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO-PI Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SHO-PI trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs APLE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while APLE trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PK Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PK trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PK's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PG Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB-PG trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB-PH trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SHO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SHO trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 88.45. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs DRH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while DRH trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs XHR Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while XHR trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 59.16. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -23.49. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RLJ Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while RLJ trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB-PE trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs RLJ-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PF Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB-PF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CLDT-PA Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 991M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.05. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT-PC Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs INN-PE Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 614.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while INN-PE trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs INN Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 586.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while INN trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas INN's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs HT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SVC Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SVC trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CLDT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while CLDT trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 120.67. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while BHR-PD trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -70.61. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR-PB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while BHR-PB trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -44.76. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs BHR Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while BHR trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHOB Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SOHOB trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHOO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SOHOO trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHON Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SOHON trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHON's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PG Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT-PG trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PH Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT-PH trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT-PD trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PI Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT-PI trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs AHT-PF Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while AHT-PF trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs IHT Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while IHT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs SOHO Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while SOHO trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOHO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is less volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CDOR Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs CPLG Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.
INN-PF vs PEB-PD Comparison
INN-PF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INN-PF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INN-PF is priced at $17.76, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INN-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -30.46, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, INN-PF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INN-PF is more volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INN-PF.