Intel Corporation

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while NVD.DE trades at €153.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 56.31. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check NVD.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while NVD.F trades at €153.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check NVD.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while 1YD.DE trades at €256.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 104.46. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check 1YD.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while TSFA.F trades at €206.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check TSFA.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 240.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while AMD.DE trades at €152.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 122.61. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check AMD.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 234.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while ASME.DE trades at €602.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check ASME.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while TII.DE trades at €157.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check TII.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while QCI.DE trades at €127.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check QCI.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while AP2.DE trades at €156.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check AP2.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, HY9H.F has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while HY9H.F trades at €163.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas HY9H.F's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HY9H.F's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to HY9H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check HY9H.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while MTE.DE trades at €93.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check MTE.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while KLA.DE trades at €763.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check KLA.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while ANL.DE trades at €198.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check ANL.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check LAR.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while INL.DE trades at €16.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F and INL.DE have similar daily volatility (1.25).Check INL.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while IFX.DE trades at €33.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check IFX.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while VNX.DE trades at €156.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check VNX.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check MXI.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while SGM.DE trades at €21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check SGM.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while AWM.DE trades at €63.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check AWM.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check CR6.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check 2QO.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check WAF1.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check RMB.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while AIX2.F trades at €28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check AIX2.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while AIXA.DE trades at €14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check AIXA.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while ELG.DE trades at €87.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check ELG.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while SOH1.F trades at €36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check SOH1.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while WAF.DE trades at €36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check WAF.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 617.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while SMHN.DE trades at €31.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check SMHN.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 597.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while SIS.DE trades at €57.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is -33.41. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check SIS.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while CPIA.F trades at €14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check CPIA.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while CTNK.F trades at €5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check CTNK.F's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check M5Z.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check DQW1.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while MCP.DE trades at €63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check MCP.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is less volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check MVIN.DE's competition here

INL.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, INL.F stands at 72.6B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.F is priced at €16.88, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

INL.F currently has a P/E ratio of -4.02, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, INL.F's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.F is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.F.Check DLG.DE's competition here