Intel Corporation (INL.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INL.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INL.DE | €112.82 | -0.79% | 567B | -308.20 | -€0.37 | N/A |
| NVD.DE | €169.98 | -1.06% | 4.1T | 33.93 | €5.01 | +0.14% |
| 1YD.DE | €323.90 | -3.27% | 1.5T | 59.39 | €5.45 | +0.68% |
| MTE.DE | €1,025.00 | -0.89% | 1.2T | 28.66 | €35.77 | +0.04% |
| AMD.DE | €451.80 | -0.88% | 736.7B | 125.76 | €3.59 | N/A |
| ASME.DE | €1,576.20 | -1.10% | 607.5B | 58.66 | €26.87 | +0.48% |
| KLA.DE | €216.05 | -2.46% | 282.2B | 9.07 | €23.82 | +0.32% |
| TII.DE | €264.80 | -2.59% | 241B | 53.93 | €4.91 | +1.80% |
| QCI.DE | €178.34 | -0.77% | 188B | 18.56 | €9.61 | +1.73% |
| ANL.DE | €337.70 | -8.13% | 165.1B | 48.42 | €7.00 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
INL.DE vs NVD.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while NVD.DE trades at €169.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check NVD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs 1YD.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while 1YD.DE trades at €323.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 59.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MTE.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while MTE.DE trades at €1,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MTE.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AMD.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 736.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while AMD.DE trades at €451.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 125.76. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AMD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ASME.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 607.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while ASME.DE trades at €1,576.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ASME.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs KLA.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 282.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while KLA.DE trades at €216.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check KLA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs TII.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while TII.DE trades at €264.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 53.93. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TII.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs QCI.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while QCI.DE trades at €178.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check QCI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ANL.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while ANL.DE trades at €337.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 48.42. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ANL.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs IFX.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while IFX.DE trades at €78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check IFX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs LAR.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check LAR.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs VNX.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while VNX.DE trades at €242.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check VNX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SGM.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while SGM.DE trades at €62.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 189.32. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SGM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MCP.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while MCP.DE trades at €77.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 404.05. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MCP.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MXI.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MXI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AWM.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while AWM.DE trades at €59.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AWM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs CR6.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CR6.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs 2QO.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AIXA.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while AIXA.DE trades at €52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 97.33. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF1.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ELG.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while ELG.DE trades at €177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ELG.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs RMB.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check RMB.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while WAF.DE trades at €82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is -19.03. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SMHN.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while SMHN.DE trades at €92.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs TPE.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, TPE.DE has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while TPE.DE trades at €43.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas TPE.DE's P/E ratio is 442.01. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TPE.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to TPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TPE.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SIS.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while SIS.DE trades at €55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SIS.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs M5Z.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs XIX.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, XIX.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while XIX.DE trades at €191.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas XIX.DE's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XIX.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to XIX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check XIX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MVIN.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs DQW1.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs DLG.DE Comparison July 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 567B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €112.82, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -308.20, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DLG.DE's competition here