Intel Corporation
Intel Corporation (INL.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INL.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INL.DE | €38.55 | -2.82% | 192.6B | -771.00 | -€0.05 | N/A |
| NVD.DE | €156.32 | -1.38% | 3.8T | 37.31 | €4.19 | +0.02% |
| NVD.F | €153.00 | -3.47% | 3.7T | 36.52 | €4.19 | +0.02% |
| TSFA.F | €290.00 | -4.45% | 1.5T | 32.26 | €8.99 | +0.71% |
| 1YD.DE | €291.60 | +1.00% | 1.4T | 71.12 | €4.10 | +0.71% |
| ASME.DE | €1,146.00 | -3.32% | 441.7B | 46.43 | €24.68 | +0.58% |
| MTE.DE | €335.05 | -2.37% | 377.1B | 37.10 | €9.03 | +0.12% |
| HY9H.F | €506.00 | -4.17% | 350.8B | 17.34 | €29.29 | +0.12% |
| AMD.DE | €171.26 | -1.54% | 279.2B | 76.46 | €2.24 | N/A |
| AP2.DE | €290.95 | -3.10% | 230.9B | 34.72 | €8.38 | +0.54% |
Stock Comparison
INL.DE vs NVD.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while NVD.DE trades at €156.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check NVD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs NVD.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while NVD.F trades at €153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check NVD.F's competition here
INL.DE vs TSFA.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while TSFA.F trades at €290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TSFA.F's competition here
INL.DE vs 1YD.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while 1YD.DE trades at €291.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 71.12. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ASME.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 441.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while ASME.DE trades at €1,146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 46.43. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ASME.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MTE.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 377.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while MTE.DE trades at €335.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MTE.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs HY9H.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, HY9H.F has a market cap of 350.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while HY9H.F trades at €506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas HY9H.F's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HY9H.F's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to HY9H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check HY9H.F's competition here
INL.DE vs AMD.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 279.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while AMD.DE trades at €171.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 76.46. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AMD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AP2.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 230.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while AP2.DE trades at €290.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AP2.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs INL.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while INL.F trades at €37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -750.20. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check INL.F's competition here
INL.DE vs KLA.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while KLA.DE trades at €1,203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check KLA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs TII.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while TII.DE trades at €167.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TII.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ANL.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while ANL.DE trades at €278.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ANL.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs QCI.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while QCI.DE trades at €117.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check QCI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs LAR.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check LAR.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs IFX.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while IFX.DE trades at €39.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check IFX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs VNX.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while VNX.DE trades at €173.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check VNX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MCP.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while MCP.DE trades at €55.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is -218.04. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MCP.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SGM.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while SGM.DE trades at €27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 181.07. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SGM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MXI.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MXI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs CR6.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CR6.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AWM.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while AWM.DE trades at €47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AWM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs 2QO.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF1.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AIXA.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while AIXA.DE trades at €28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AIX2.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while AIX2.F trades at €57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AIX2.F's competition here
INL.DE vs RMB.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check RMB.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ELG.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while ELG.DE trades at €139.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ELG.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while WAF.DE trades at €50.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is -55.22. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SOH1.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while SOH1.F trades at €41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 147.18. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SOH1.F's competition here
INL.DE vs CPIA.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while CPIA.F trades at €32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 87.03. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CPIA.F's competition here
INL.DE vs SMHN.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 995.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while SMHN.DE trades at €52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SIS.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 558.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while SIS.DE trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SIS.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs CTNK.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while CTNK.F trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CTNK.F's competition here
INL.DE vs M5Z.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs M5Z.F Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, M5Z.F has a market cap of 728.7K. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while M5Z.F trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas M5Z.F's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to M5Z.F's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to M5Z.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check M5Z.F's competition here
INL.DE vs DQW1.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs XIX.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, XIX.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while XIX.DE trades at €191.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas XIX.DE's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XIX.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to XIX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check XIX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MVIN.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs DLG.DE Comparison March 2026
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 192.6B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €38.55, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -771.00, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DLG.DE's competition here