Intel Corporation
Intel Corporation (INL.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INL.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INL.DE | €16.98 | +1.57% | 73.9B | -4.04 | -€4.18 | +0.74% |
| NVD.F | €157.00 | +4.50% | 3.8T | 57.05 | €2.72 | +0.02% |
| NVD.DE | €156.96 | +3.62% | 3.8T | 56.77 | €2.71 | +0.02% |
| 1YD.DE | €259.30 | +3.43% | 1.2T | 106.51 | €2.41 | +0.83% |
| TSFA.F | €207.00 | +1.97% | 1.1T | 28.40 | €7.29 | +0.78% |
| AMD.DE | €155.64 | +4.91% | 247.3B | 127.12 | €1.20 | N/A |
| ASME.DE | €600.10 | +0.82% | 237B | 25.05 | €24.05 | +1.08% |
| TII.DE | €158.60 | +2.20% | 143.4B | 32.87 | €4.80 | +3.15% |
| QCI.DE | €128.36 | +0.25% | 138B | 14.10 | €9.07 | +2.52% |
| AP2.DE | €159.48 | +2.94% | 125.8B | 21.77 | €7.20 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
INL.DE vs NVD.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while NVD.F trades at €157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 57.05. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check NVD.F's competition here
INL.DE vs NVD.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while NVD.DE trades at €156.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 56.77. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check NVD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs 1YD.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while 1YD.DE trades at €259.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 106.51. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs TSFA.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while TSFA.F trades at €207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TSFA.F's competition here
INL.DE vs AMD.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 247.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while AMD.DE trades at €155.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 127.12. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AMD.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ASME.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while ASME.DE trades at €600.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ASME.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs TII.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while TII.DE trades at €158.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check TII.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs QCI.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while QCI.DE trades at €128.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check QCI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AP2.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while AP2.DE trades at €159.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AP2.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs HY9H.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, HY9H.F has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while HY9H.F trades at €162.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas HY9H.F's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HY9H.F's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to HY9H.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check HY9H.F's competition here
INL.DE vs MTE.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while MTE.DE trades at €94.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MTE.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs KLA.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while KLA.DE trades at €763.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check KLA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ANL.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while ANL.DE trades at €198.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ANL.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs LAR.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check LAR.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs INL.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while INL.F trades at €17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE and INL.F have similar daily volatility (2.01).Check INL.F's competition here
INL.DE vs IFX.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while IFX.DE trades at €35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check IFX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs VNX.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while VNX.DE trades at €156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check VNX.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MXI.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MXI.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SGM.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while SGM.DE trades at €21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SGM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AWM.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while AWM.DE trades at €63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AWM.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs CR6.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CR6.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs 2QO.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, 2QO.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while 2QO.DE trades at €73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas 2QO.DE's P/E ratio is -87.39. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to 2QO.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to 2QO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check 2QO.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF1.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs RMB.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check RMB.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs AIX2.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while AIX2.F trades at €28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AIX2.F's competition here
INL.DE vs AIXA.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while AIXA.DE trades at €13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs ELG.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while ELG.DE trades at €89.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check ELG.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SOH1.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while SOH1.F trades at €36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SOH1.F's competition here
INL.DE vs WAF.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while WAF.DE trades at €36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is 37.63. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check WAF.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SMHN.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 601.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while SMHN.DE trades at €32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs SIS.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 593.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while SIS.DE trades at €57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is -33.18. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check SIS.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs CPIA.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 505.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while CPIA.F trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CPIA.F's competition here
INL.DE vs CTNK.F Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while CTNK.F trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check CTNK.F's competition here
INL.DE vs M5Z.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs DQW1.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MCP.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while MCP.DE trades at €63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MCP.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs MVIN.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is less volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
INL.DE vs DLG.DE Comparison August 2025
INL.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INL.DE stands at 73.9B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INL.DE is priced at €16.98, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INL.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.04, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, INL.DE's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INL.DE is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INL.DE.Check DLG.DE's competition here