Impala Platinum Holdings Limited
Impala Platinum Holdings Limited (IMPUY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IMPUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMPUY | $21.43 | +3.53% | 19.4B | 429.40 | $0.05 | +0.44% |
| FNLPF | $55.56 | -4.11% | 40.8B | 89.39 | $0.62 | +1.60% |
| ANGPY | $18.98 | +1.77% | 29.9B | 379.60 | $0.05 | +3.04% |
| IMPUF | $17.85 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.53% |
| MMSMY | $46.78 | -1.72% | 13.4B | 44.13 | $1.06 | +0.39% |
| JINFF | $26.61 | +1.76% | 10.5B | 25.83 | $1.03 | +0.30% |
| GMINF | $39.55 | +5.30% | 8.8B | 34.04 | $1.13 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 24.70 | $5.28 | +0.98% |
| OICT | $11.25 | +0.00% | 6.2B | -38.40 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IMPUY vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while FNLPF trades at $55.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 89.39. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check FNLPF's competition here
IMPUY vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ANGPY trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 379.60. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ANGPY's competition here
IMPUY vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while IMPUF trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check IMPUF's competition here
IMPUY vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while MMSMY trades at $46.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check MMSMY's competition here
IMPUY vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while JINFF trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check JINFF's competition here
IMPUY vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while GMINF trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check GMINF's competition here
IMPUY vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check XZJCF's competition here
IMPUY vs OICT Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while OICT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check OICT's competition here
IMPUY vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check NMPNF's competition here
IMPUY vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ABBRF trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -115.51. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ABBRF's competition here
IMPUY vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ZMPLF trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ZMPLF's competition here
IMPUY vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check POYYF's competition here
IMPUY vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while GLGDF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check GLGDF's competition here
IMPUY vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check AUCOY's competition here
IMPUY vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TIHRF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TIHRF's competition here
IMPUY vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check FCSUF's competition here
IMPUY vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while BKRRF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check BKRRF's competition here
IMPUY vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SAPLF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SAPLF's competition here
IMPUY vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SLVTF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -72.91. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SLVTF's competition here
IMPUY vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while BRVMF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -113.83. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check BRVMF's competition here
IMPUY vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while IAUFF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check IAUFF's competition here
IMPUY vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TPRFF's competition here
IMPUY vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while HGLD trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check HGLD's competition here
IMPUY vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while GOTRF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check GOTRF's competition here
IMPUY vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SMDRF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SMDRF's competition here
IMPUY vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CHPGF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -83.75. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CHPGF's competition here
IMPUY vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SSVFF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SSVFF's competition here
IMPUY vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PAASF's competition here
IMPUY vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ORVMF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ORVMF's competition here
IMPUY vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 184.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CAPTF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -168.10. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CAPTF's competition here
IMPUY vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TBXXF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TBXXF's competition here
IMPUY vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check BOCOF's competition here
IMPUY vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SNNGF's competition here
IMPUY vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PLLHF's competition here
IMPUY vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check XANAF's competition here
IMPUY vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while AGLDF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check AGLDF's competition here
IMPUY vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while OCGSF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check OCGSF's competition here
IMPUY vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while NAUFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check NAUFF's competition here
IMPUY vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SCTSF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SCTSF's competition here
IMPUY vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -312.10. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SDRC's competition here
IMPUY vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ACRG trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -17.76. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ACRG's competition here
IMPUY vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while EMPYF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check EMPYF's competition here
IMPUY vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PGLDF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PGLDF's competition here
IMPUY vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CTNXF's competition here
IMPUY vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while LGCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check LGCXF's competition here
IMPUY vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ELRFF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ELRFF's competition here
IMPUY vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TEUTF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -28.17. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TEUTF's competition here
IMPUY vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TSORF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TSORF's competition here
IMPUY vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while AMNP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check AMNP's competition here
IMPUY vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check LUCRF's competition here
IMPUY vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while DNCVF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check DNCVF's competition here
IMPUY vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while AGMRF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check AGMRF's competition here
IMPUY vs THMG Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while THMG trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.98. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check THMG's competition here
IMPUY vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while KDKCF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check KDKCF's competition here
IMPUY vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while LBCMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check LBCMF's competition here
IMPUY vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while VIPRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check VIPRF's competition here
IMPUY vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while EQMEF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check EQMEF's competition here
IMPUY vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check HEGLF's competition here
IMPUY vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while VLMGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check VLMGF's competition here
IMPUY vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ARRKF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ARRKF's competition here
IMPUY vs BBBXF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while BBBXF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check BBBXF's competition here
IMPUY vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check MMNGF's competition here
IMPUY vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CPPMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CPPMF's competition here
IMPUY vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while DNRSF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check DNRSF's competition here
IMPUY vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check BRGC's competition here
IMPUY vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ACKRF's competition here
IMPUY vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SMOFF's competition here
IMPUY vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PDLMF's competition here
IMPUY vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check VTXXF's competition here
IMPUY vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while EMPPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check EMPPF's competition here
IMPUY vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ATEPF's competition here
IMPUY vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CTMCF's competition here
IMPUY vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while RKHNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check RKHNF's competition here
IMPUY vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while KGFMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check KGFMF's competition here
IMPUY vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ADYRF's competition here
IMPUY vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while DYNR trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check DYNR's competition here
IMPUY vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PNTRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PNTRF's competition here
IMPUY vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SSVRF's competition here
IMPUY vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while PVGDF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check PVGDF's competition here
IMPUY vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check HMRRF's competition here
IMPUY vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check MRZLF's competition here
IMPUY vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check CJIMF's competition here
IMPUY vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while WEXPF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check WEXPF's competition here
IMPUY vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check OKPRF's competition here
IMPUY vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while WAMFF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check WAMFF's competition here
IMPUY vs RITE Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check RITE's competition here
IMPUY vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check TLSMF's competition here
IMPUY vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IMPUY has daily volatility of 4.18 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
IMPUY vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SUNPF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SUNPF's competition here
IMPUY vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ESGLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ESGLF's competition here
IMPUY vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check GLDRF's competition here
IMPUY vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check ASLRF's competition here
IMPUY vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SBMCF's competition here
IMPUY vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while STRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check STRFF's competition here
IMPUY vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SHGDF's competition here
IMPUY vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while AUCUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check AUCUF's competition here
IMPUY vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check URVNF's competition here
IMPUY vs SBLRF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while SBLRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check SBLRF's competition here
IMPUY vs GSMGF Comparison February 2026
IMPUY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMPUY stands at 19.4B. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMPUY is priced at $21.43, while GSMGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMPUY currently has a P/E ratio of 429.40, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, IMPUY's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IMPUY is more volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMPUY.Check GSMGF's competition here