Italian Food & Beverage Corp.
Italian Food & Beverage Corp. IFBC Peers
See (IFBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBC | $0.00 | -3.57% | 1.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DGEAF | $25.62 | -0.02% | 58B | 16.21 | $1.61 | +4.00% |
| PRNDY | $20.04 | +0.00% | 26.3B | 20.68 | $1.01 | +4.87% |
| PDRDF | $98.55 | +0.00% | 25.6B | 20.22 | $5.04 | +4.93% |
| TBVPY | $36.03 | +0.00% | 9.8B | 11.19 | $3.50 | +4.69% |
| TBVPF | $0.36 | +0.00% | 8.9B | 11.83 | $0.03 | +5.20% |
| DVCMY | $6.63 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 43.31 | $0.16 | +1.06% |
| DVDCF | $6.60 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 42.19 | $0.16 | +1.09% |
| EDVGF | $2.62 | +0.00% | 5B | 16.47 | $0.17 | +3.60% |
| BCCLF | $1.22 | +10.91% | 4.3B | 19.83 | $0.06 | +1.71% |
Stock Comparison
IFBC vs DGEAF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DGEAF trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs PRNDY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while PRNDY trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs PDRDF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while PDRDF trades at $98.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TBVPY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TBVPY trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TBVPF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TBVPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TBVPF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBVPF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TBVPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TBVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DVCMY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DVCMY trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DVDCF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DVDCF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs EDVGF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while EDVGF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs BCCLF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while BCCLF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TSRYY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TSRYY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 46.64. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TSRYF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TSRYF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 46.27. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TSRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs REMYY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while REMYY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs REMYF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while REMYF trades at $51.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DSTZF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DSTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs LPRRF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to LPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs GBSMF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to GBSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs BVDRF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to BVDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs CBYDF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CBYDF trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs CRBBF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CRBBF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs ADWPF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ADWPF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to ADWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs CWGL Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CWGL trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 275.00. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs MJWNY Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while MJWNY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs NWINF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while NWINF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to NWINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs LRKKF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs AUVGF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while AUVGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs CATWF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CATWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs VDKB Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DWWEF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DWWEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SLLFF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TNYBF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SVIN Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SVIN trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs THST Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to THST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs RSAU Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while RSAU trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs EWRC Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SRSG Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 816.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SRSG trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs ASCC Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 744.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ASCC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SBES Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 579.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SBES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SHNJF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SHNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs MLMN Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 162.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to MLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs TGRR Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs ICNB Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 54K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DKTS Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs DKAM Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs SBDCF Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.
IFBC vs FPWM Comparison
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.