Italian Food & Beverage Corp.
Italian Food & Beverage Corp. (IFBC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IFBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBC | $0.00 | +9.09% | 1.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DGEAF | $24.69 | -6.34% | 54.9B | 15.34 | $1.61 | +4.21% |
| PDRDF | $109.94 | +1.34% | 27.7B | 21.43 | $5.13 | +4.67% |
| PRNDY | $20.75 | -3.71% | 26.1B | 20.34 | $1.02 | +4.33% |
| TBVPY | $36.94 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 10.49 | $3.52 | +4.99% |
| DVCMY | $7.16 | -1.38% | 8.6B | 44.75 | $0.16 | +1.15% |
| TBVPF | $0.34 | -4.76% | 8.5B | 8.50 | $0.04 | +5.43% |
| DVDCF | $7.06 | -5.23% | 8.5B | 44.13 | $0.16 | +1.05% |
| EDVGF | $2.71 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 15.94 | $0.17 | +4.88% |
| BCCLF | $1.28 | -8.57% | 4.6B | 21.33 | $0.06 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
IFBC vs DGEAF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DGEAF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DGEAF's competition here
IFBC vs PDRDF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while PDRDF trades at $109.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check PDRDF's competition here
IFBC vs PRNDY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while PRNDY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check PRNDY's competition here
IFBC vs TBVPY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TBVPY trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TBVPY's competition here
IFBC vs DVCMY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DVCMY trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DVCMY's competition here
IFBC vs TBVPF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TBVPF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TBVPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBVPF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TBVPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TBVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TBVPF's competition here
IFBC vs DVDCF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DVDCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DVDCF's competition here
IFBC vs EDVGF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while EDVGF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check EDVGF's competition here
IFBC vs BCCLF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while BCCLF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check BCCLF's competition here
IFBC vs TSRYF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TSRYF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TSRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TSRYF's competition here
IFBC vs TSRYY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TSRYY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TSRYY's competition here
IFBC vs REMYF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while REMYF trades at $61.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check REMYF's competition here
IFBC vs REMYY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while REMYY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check REMYY's competition here
IFBC vs DSTZF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DSTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DSTZF's competition here
IFBC vs LPRRF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to LPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check LPRRF's competition here
IFBC vs GBSMF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to GBSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check GBSMF's competition here
IFBC vs CRBBF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CRBBF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check CRBBF's competition here
IFBC vs CBYDF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CBYDF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check CBYDF's competition here
IFBC vs BVDRF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to BVDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check BVDRF's competition here
IFBC vs ADWPF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ADWPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to ADWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check ADWPF's competition here
IFBC vs SBES Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SBES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SBES's competition here
IFBC vs CWGL Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CWGL trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check CWGL's competition here
IFBC vs MJWNY Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while MJWNY trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check MJWNY's competition here
IFBC vs NWINF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while NWINF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to NWINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check NWINF's competition here
IFBC vs LRKKF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check LRKKF's competition here
IFBC vs AUVGF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while AUVGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check AUVGF's competition here
IFBC vs CATWF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to CATWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check CATWF's competition here
IFBC vs VDKB Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check VDKB's competition here
IFBC vs DWWEF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DWWEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DWWEF's competition here
IFBC vs SLLFF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SLLFF's competition here
IFBC vs TNYBF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +16.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TNYBF's competition here
IFBC vs SVIN Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SVIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SVIN's competition here
IFBC vs THST Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to THST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check THST's competition here
IFBC vs RSAU Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while RSAU trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check RSAU's competition here
IFBC vs EWRC Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check EWRC's competition here
IFBC vs ASCC Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ASCC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check ASCC's competition here
IFBC vs SRSG Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 449.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SRSG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SRSG's competition here
IFBC vs SHNJF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to SHNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SHNJF's competition here
IFBC vs DKAM Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DKAM's competition here
IFBC vs MLMN Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 208.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to MLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check MLMN's competition here
IFBC vs SBDCF Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check SBDCF's competition here
IFBC vs TGRR Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check TGRR's competition here
IFBC vs ICNB Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 54K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check ICNB's competition here
IFBC vs DKTS Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check DKTS's competition here
IFBC vs FPWM Comparison July 2025
IFBC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFBC stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, IFBC is priced at $0.00, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, IFBC's ROE is +0.76%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IFBC is more volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFBC.Check FPWM's competition here