Internet Thailand Public Company Limited
Internet Thailand Public Company Limited IE2A.F Peers
See (IE2A.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IE2A.F | €0.10 | +1.51% | 65.9M | 5.05 | €0.02 | +102.22% |
| IBM.DE | €249.70 | +0.06% | 232.1B | 49.25 | €5.07 | +2.53% |
| FIV.DE | €219.40 | +0.27% | 126.3B | 62.87 | €3.49 | N/A |
| COZ.DE | €84.46 | -0.68% | 41.6B | 19.78 | €4.27 | +1.33% |
| BC8.DE | €39.78 | +1.58% | 5B | 22.10 | €1.80 | +1.52% |
| 4018.F | €1,041.00 | -16.72% | 1.9B | 72.47 | €17.18 | N/A |
| 217A.F | €6.00 | -0.83% | 1.5B | -585.00 | -€0.01 | N/A |
| NB2.DE | €24.00 | -0.83% | 1.5B | -10.86 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| NB2.F | €24.48 | +3.29% | 1.5B | -10.77 | -€2.21 | N/A |
| CHG.DE | €42.00 | +0.00% | 965.4M | -84.00 | -€0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IE2A.F vs IBM.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, IBM.DE has a market cap of 232.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while IBM.DE trades at €249.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas IBM.DE's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to IBM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs FIV.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, FIV.DE has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while FIV.DE trades at €219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas FIV.DE's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIV.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to FIV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs COZ.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, COZ.DE has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while COZ.DE trades at €84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas COZ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COZ.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to COZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs BC8.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, BC8.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while BC8.DE trades at €39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas BC8.DE's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BC8.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to BC8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs 4018.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 4018.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 4018.F trades at €1,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 4018.F's P/E ratio is 72.47. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4018.F's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to 4018.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs 217A.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 217A.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 217A.F trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 217A.F's P/E ratio is -585.00. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 217A.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to 217A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs NB2.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, NB2.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while NB2.DE trades at €24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NB2.DE's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NB2.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to NB2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs NB2.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, NB2.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while NB2.F trades at €24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NB2.F's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NB2.F's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to NB2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs CHG.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 965.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while CHG.DE trades at €42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs COK.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, COK.DE has a market cap of 884M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while COK.DE trades at €28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas COK.DE's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to COK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs DE000A3H2200.SG Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, DE000A3H2200.SG has a market cap of 823.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while DE000A3H2200.SG trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas DE000A3H2200.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DE000A3H2200.SG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to DE000A3H2200.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs NA9.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, NA9.DE has a market cap of 797.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while NA9.DE trades at €61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NA9.DE's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NA9.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to NA9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs NA9.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, NA9.F has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while NA9.F trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas NA9.F's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NA9.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to NA9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs USY1.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, USY1.DE has a market cap of 700.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while USY1.DE trades at €10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas USY1.DE's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USY1.DE's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and USY1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs GFT.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, GFT.DE has a market cap of 655.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while GFT.DE trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas GFT.DE's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GFT.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to GFT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs ADN1.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, ADN1.DE has a market cap of 570.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while ADN1.DE trades at €88.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ADN1.DE's P/E ratio is -807.27. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADN1.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to ADN1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs SHF.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, SHF.DE has a market cap of 517.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while SHF.DE trades at €71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SHF.DE's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHF.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to SHF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs D6H.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, D6H.DE has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while D6H.DE trades at €61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas D6H.DE's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to D6H.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to D6H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs IXX.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, IXX.DE has a market cap of 375.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while IXX.DE trades at €38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas IXX.DE's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IXX.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to IXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs A1OS.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, A1OS.DE has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while A1OS.DE trades at €56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas A1OS.DE's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to A1OS.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to A1OS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs MCE.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, MCE.DE has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while MCE.DE trades at €14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MCE.DE's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to MCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs AEIN.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, AEIN.DE has a market cap of 227.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while AEIN.DE trades at €19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas AEIN.DE's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEIN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to AEIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs OSP2.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, OSP2.DE has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while OSP2.DE trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas OSP2.DE's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSP2.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to OSP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs 30L3.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 30L3.DE has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 30L3.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 30L3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 30L3.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to 30L3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs QBY.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, QBY.DE has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while QBY.DE trades at €0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas QBY.DE's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QBY.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to QBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs OBS.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, OBS.DE has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while OBS.DE trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas OBS.DE's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OBS.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and OBS.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs 3IT.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 3IT.F has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 3IT.F trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 3IT.F's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3IT.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and 3IT.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs 3IT.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 3IT.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 3IT.DE trades at €13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 3IT.DE's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3IT.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to 3IT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs SYT.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, SYT.DE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while SYT.DE trades at €3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SYT.DE's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYT.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to SYT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs KSC.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, KSC.DE has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while KSC.DE trades at €0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas KSC.DE's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSC.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to KSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs T3T1.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, T3T1.DE has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while T3T1.DE trades at €5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas T3T1.DE's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to T3T1.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and T3T1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs PDA.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, PDA.DE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while PDA.DE trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas PDA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PDA.DE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to PDA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs AMI.F Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, AMI.F has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while AMI.F trades at €0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas AMI.F's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMI.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to AMI.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs SHWK.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, SHWK.DE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while SHWK.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SHWK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHWK.DE's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to SHWK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs AMI.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, AMI.DE has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while AMI.DE trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas AMI.DE's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMI.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to AMI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs RTC.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, RTC.DE has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while RTC.DE trades at €1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas RTC.DE's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RTC.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to RTC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs ASKN.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, ASKN.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while ASKN.DE trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas ASKN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASKN.DE's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to ASKN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs MDV.DU Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, MDV.DU has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while MDV.DU trades at €6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas MDV.DU's P/E ratio is -71.26. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDV.DU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and MDV.DU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs SFD1.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, SFD1.DE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while SFD1.DE trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas SFD1.DE's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFD1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and SFD1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IE2A.F vs EUCA.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, EUCA.DE has a market cap of 990.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while EUCA.DE trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas EUCA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EUCA.DE's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to EUCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs WDL.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, WDL.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while WDL.DE trades at €1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas WDL.DE's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDL.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F is less volatile compared to WDL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IE2A.F.
IE2A.F vs 2QU.DE Comparison
IE2A.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IE2A.F stands at 65.9M. In comparison, 2QU.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IE2A.F is priced at €0.10, while 2QU.DE trades at €17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IE2A.F currently has a P/E ratio of 5.05, whereas 2QU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IE2A.F's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2QU.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IE2A.F and 2QU.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).