Indutrade AB (publ)
Indutrade AB (publ) IDDWF Peers
See (IDDWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDDWF | $26.45 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 33.06 | $0.80 | +0.12% |
| ADRZY | $15.12 | +6.18% | 7.4B | 13.62 | $1.11 | +4.09% |
| TMTNF | $90.03 | -0.03% | 7.3B | 20.28 | $4.44 | +1.59% |
| ADRZF | $69.99 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 12.59 | $5.56 | +4.01% |
| REECF | $10.29 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 27.08 | $0.38 | +1.41% |
| FINGF | $41.56 | -0.19% | 5.6B | 16.05 | $2.59 | +1.95% |
| EENEF | $8.04 | -16.77% | 3.7B | 17.86 | $0.44 | +4.65% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +4.44% |
| RUSMF | $30.98 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 15.81 | $1.96 | +3.91% |
| HDIUF | $19.55 | +0.00% | 485M | 12.14 | $1.61 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
IDDWF vs ADRZY Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZY trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs TMTNF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TMTNF trades at $90.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs ADRZF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZF trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs REECF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while REECF trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs FINGF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while FINGF trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs EENEF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EENEF trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs GROUF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GROUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs RUSMF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while RUSMF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs HDIUF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 485M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HDIUF trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs WJXFF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 358.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WJXFF trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs PRKCF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PRKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs KHDHF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while KHDHF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs HPURF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HPURF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs CVTYF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CVTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs EMPS Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs TXHG Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs VVWT Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 169.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VVWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs GYOG Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GYOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs PHOT Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 22.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs CDIIQ Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs MJHI Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to MJHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs WARM Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs UMAM Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while UMAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs ORGH Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs PUDA Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs VALV Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs SLUP Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs CGDI Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CGDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs HESV Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HESV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs WPMLF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs ZAHA Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ZAHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.