Indutrade AB (publ)
Indutrade AB (publ) IDDWF Peers
See (IDDWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDDWF | $26.45 | -7.13% | 9.6B | 33.06 | $0.80 | +1.12% |
| REECF | $14.00 | -12.50% | 9B | 37.84 | $0.37 | +1.04% |
| ADRZF | $71.25 | +1.50% | 7B | 12.91 | $5.52 | +3.47% |
| ADRZY | $14.20 | +0.34% | 6.9B | 12.90 | $1.10 | +3.83% |
| TMTNF | $83.10 | -0.54% | 6.8B | 18.93 | $4.39 | +1.69% |
| FINGF | $36.86 | +0.90% | 5B | 14.29 | $2.58 | +2.20% |
| EENEF | $9.66 | +26.83% | 4.6B | 21.95 | $0.44 | +2.91% |
| GROUF | $11.00 | N/A | 2.2B | 11.70 | $0.94 | +5.98% |
| RUSMF | $30.18 | +0.20% | 1.7B | 15.56 | $1.94 | +4.02% |
| HDIUF | $19.15 | N/A | 475.1M | 11.89 | $1.61 | +2.19% |
Stock Comparison
IDDWF vs REECF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while REECF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs ADRZF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZF trades at $71.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and ADRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs ADRZY Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ADRZY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and ADRZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs TMTNF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TMTNF trades at $83.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs FINGF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while FINGF trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs EENEF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EENEF trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs GROUF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GROUF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and GROUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs RUSMF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while RUSMF trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and RUSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs HDIUF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 475.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HDIUF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and HDIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs WJXFF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WJXFF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs PRKCF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and PRKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs KHDHF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while KHDHF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and KHDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs ORGH Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ORGH trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is -61.48. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs HPURF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HPURF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and HPURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs CVTYF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and CVTYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs EMPS Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and EMPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs TXHG Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs UMAM Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 252.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while UMAM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs VVWT Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 158.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VVWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs VALV Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 149.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while VALV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs WARM Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 86.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and WARM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs PHOT Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and PHOT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs CDIIQ Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs MJHI Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and MJHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs SLUP Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.
IDDWF vs PUDA Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and PUDA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs GYOG Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and GYOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs CGDI Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and CGDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs HESV Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and HESV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs ZAHA Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF and ZAHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IDDWF vs WPMLF Comparison
IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $26.45, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 33.06, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.