Indutrade AB (publ)

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 49.75B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while GWW trades at $1,035.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 45.09B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while FAST trades at $78.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 34.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while FERG trades at $171.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 19.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WSO trades at $476.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 19.20B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WSO-B trades at $476.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 11.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while POOL trades at $301.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while CNM trades at $51.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while REECF trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while AIT trades at $220.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WCC trades at $161.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while ADRZF trades at $69.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while ADRZY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while TMTNF trades at $80.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while SITE trades at $124.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while MSM trades at $76.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while FINGF trades at $29.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while EENEF trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while GROUF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GROUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, RUSMF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while RUSMF trades at $28.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas RUSMF's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RUSMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to RUSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while SYX trades at $35.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while DXPE trades at $84.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WCC-PA trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while DSGR trades at $26.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 1317.75. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 990.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while GIC trades at $25.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.76M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while LAWS trades at $40.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 732.84M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while TRNS trades at $78.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 482.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while HDIUF trades at $19.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 446.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while TITN trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 340.02M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WJXFF trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 207.92M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while EVI trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to PRKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 99.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while KHDHF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 77.21M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while HPURF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 69.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while RECT trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.29M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CVTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 68.25M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while BRIA trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 54.34M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while HTLM trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.65M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while EMPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to EMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while TXHG trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TXHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 168300.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while VVWT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150577.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while GYOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GYOG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to GYOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 86237.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WARM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 11077.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while PHOT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to PHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9190.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9107.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while MJHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to MJHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5056.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while UMAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4917.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while ORGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1720.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while VALV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while SLUP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while PUDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while CGDI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to CGDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17.00. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while HESV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HESV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, HWCC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while HWCC trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, WPMLF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.

IDDWF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IDDWF stands at 10.38B. In comparison, ZAHA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IDDWF is priced at $28.48, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IDDWF currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDDWF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IDDWF is more volatile compared to ZAHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDDWF.