Inpoint Commercial Real Estate Income, Inc.
Inpoint Commercial Real Estate Income, Inc. ICR-PA Peers
See (ICR-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICR-PA | $18.30 | -0.33% | 68.2M | 26.83 | $0.68 | N/A |
| RITM-PB | $25.56 | +0.71% | 13.5B | N/A | N/A | +8.73% |
| RITM-PA | $25.55 | +0.51% | 13.5B | 17.50 | $1.46 | +8.73% |
| RITM-PC | $24.75 | +0.32% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +8.73% |
| RITM-PD | $24.25 | +0.46% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +8.73% |
| NLY-PF | $25.44 | +0.36% | 11.7B | 14.38 | $1.77 | +14.15% |
| NLY | $19.32 | +1.50% | 11.7B | 21.01 | $0.92 | +14.15% |
| NLY-PG | $25.18 | +0.60% | 11.6B | 14.22 | $1.77 | +14.15% |
| NLY-PI | $25.39 | +0.44% | 11.6B | 14.34 | $1.77 | +14.15% |
| AGNC | $9.42 | +0.86% | 9.6B | 26.17 | $0.36 | +15.43% |
Stock Comparison
ICR-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RITM-PB trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RITM-PA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RITM-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RITM-PD trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NLY-PF trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NLY Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NLY trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NLY-PG trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NLY-PI trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNC trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNCP Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNCP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNCM Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNCM trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNCL Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNCL trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNCN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNCN trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AGNCO Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AGNCO trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs STWD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while STWD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RITM Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RITM trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NRZ Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ABR-PF trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ABR-PD trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs BXMT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while BXMT trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is -43.11. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BXMT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ABR-PE trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RWT-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RWT-PA trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RWTN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RWTN trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RC-PE Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RC-PE trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RC-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RC-PC trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MFA-PC trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC-PA trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC-PC trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMTM Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMTM trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 516.81. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC-PB trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC-PD trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ABR Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ABR trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMTL Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMTL trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 459.68. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while FBRT-PE trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMTZ trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 394.68. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while PMT-PC trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while KREF-PA trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs LADR Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while LADR trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TRTX-PC trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ARI Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ARI trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is -198.30. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ARR Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ARR trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is -39.17. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ARR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ARR-PC trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs DX Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while DX trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to DX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMTO Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs DX-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while DX-PC trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EFC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EFC trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs SCCC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while SCCC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CIM Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CIM trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs PMT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while PMT trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TWO Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TWO trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TWO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CIM-PB trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CIM-PC trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CIM-PA trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CIM-PD trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs LFT-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while LFT-PA trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 92.66. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TWO-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TWO-PA trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TWO-PC trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TWO-PB trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while PMT-PA trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -32.54. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while PMT-PB trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -32.12. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MFA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MFA trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 995.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MFA-PB trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MFAN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 980.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MFAN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MFAO Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 976.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MFAO trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs FBRT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 915M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while FBRT trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs GPMT-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while GPMT-PA trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RWT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 816M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RWT trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RWT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 785.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RC trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs RCB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 765.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while RCB trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ORC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 757.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ORC trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 737.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MITT-PC trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs SACH-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while SACH-PA trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs TRTX Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 645.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while TRTX trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs BRMK Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AIC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AIC's ROE of -26.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMT trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is -113.67. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs KREF Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while KREF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to KREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NYMTN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NYMTN trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 444.68. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs IVR Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 530.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while IVR trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 502.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while IVR-PC trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs CMTG Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while CMTG trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NREF-PA trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs REFI Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while REFI trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ACRE Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ACRE trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -20.54. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs NREF Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while NREF trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MITT-PA Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MITT-PA trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MITT Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MITT trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MITT-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MITT-PB trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AOMR Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AOMR trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs MITN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while MITN trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs EARN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, EARN has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while EARN trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas EARN's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EARN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to EARN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs SEVN Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 190.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while SEVN trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ACR-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ACR-PC trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs ACR-PD Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while ACR-PD trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 43.61. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AJX Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AJX has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AJX trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AJX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AJX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AAIC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AAIC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AAIC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AAIC's P/E ratio is -60.50. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to AAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AAIC-PB Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AAIC-PB has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AAIC-PB trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AAIC-PB's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIC-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is less volatile compared to AAIC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.
ICR-PA vs AAIC-PC Comparison
ICR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICR-PA stands at 68.2M. In comparison, AAIC-PC has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICR-PA is priced at $18.30, while AAIC-PC trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.83, whereas AAIC-PC's P/E ratio is -83.79. In terms of profitability, ICR-PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIC-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICR-PA is more volatile compared to AAIC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICR-PA.