InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (ICHGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICHGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICHGF | $119.00 | +5.64% | 18.3B | 30.91 | $3.85 | +1.39% |
| ACCYY | $9.91 | +0.81% | 11.9B | 18.68 | $0.53 | +2.20% |
| ACRFF | $48.10 | -10.23% | 11.8B | 17.55 | $2.74 | +2.74% |
| WTBDY | $9.95 | +0.15% | 6.9B | 21.20 | $0.47 | +3.16% |
| WTBCF | $38.00 | -15.45% | 6.6B | 20.32 | $1.87 | +3.40% |
| MNILY | $18.05 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 41.98 | $0.43 | +0.08% |
| PNDXF | $20.00 | +20.37% | 3.9B | 28.17 | $0.71 | +2.15% |
| MINOF | $0.67 | -29.65% | 3.5B | 22.33 | $0.03 | +38.92% |
| NHHEF | $7.78 | +44.07% | 3.4B | 14.68 | $0.53 | N/A |
| MAORF | $2.15 | +22.86% | 2.7B | -30.71 | -$0.07 | +2.33% |
Stock Comparison
ICHGF vs ACCYY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, ACCYY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while ACCYY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas ACCYY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACCYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to ACCYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check ACCYY's competition here
ICHGF vs ACRFF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, ACRFF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while ACRFF trades at $48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas ACRFF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACRFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and ACRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACRFF's competition here
ICHGF vs WTBDY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, WTBDY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while WTBDY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas WTBDY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WTBDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and WTBDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTBDY's competition here
ICHGF vs WTBCF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, WTBCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while WTBCF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas WTBCF's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WTBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and WTBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTBCF's competition here
ICHGF vs MNILY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, MNILY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while MNILY trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas MNILY's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MNILY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to MNILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check MNILY's competition here
ICHGF vs PNDXF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, PNDXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while PNDXF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas PNDXF's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PNDXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to PNDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check PNDXF's competition here
ICHGF vs MINOF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, MINOF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while MINOF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas MINOF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MINOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to MINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check MINOF's competition here
ICHGF vs NHHEF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, NHHEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while NHHEF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas NHHEF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NHHEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and NHHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHHEF's competition here
ICHGF vs MAORF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, MAORF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while MAORF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas MAORF's P/E ratio is -30.71. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MAORF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and MAORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAORF's competition here
ICHGF vs MNOIY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, MNOIY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while MNOIY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas MNOIY's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MNOIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and MNOIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNOIY's competition here
ICHGF vs SHALF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, SHALF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while SHALF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas SHALF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SHALF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and SHALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHALF's competition here
ICHGF vs SMIZF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, SMIZF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while SMIZF trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas SMIZF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SMIZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to SMIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check SMIZF's competition here
ICHGF vs SHALY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, SHALY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while SHALY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas SHALY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SHALY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and SHALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHALY's competition here
ICHGF vs CTYLF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, CTYLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while CTYLF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas CTYLF's P/E ratio is 117.00. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CTYLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to CTYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check CTYLF's competition here
ICHGF vs HKSHF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, HKSHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while HKSHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas HKSHF's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HKSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to HKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check HKSHF's competition here
ICHGF vs HKSHY Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, HKSHY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while HKSHY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas HKSHY's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HKSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and HKSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKSHY's competition here
ICHGF vs DLTTF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, DLTTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while DLTTF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas DLTTF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DLTTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to DLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check DLTTF's competition here
ICHGF vs FATLF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, FATLF has a market cap of 839.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while FATLF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas FATLF's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FATLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and FATLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FATLF's competition here
ICHGF vs CLKFF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, CLKFF has a market cap of 238.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while CLKFF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas CLKFF's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CLKFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and CLKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLKFF's competition here
ICHGF vs HOCXF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, HOCXF has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while HOCXF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas HOCXF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HOCXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and HOCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOCXF's competition here
ICHGF vs KCKSF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, KCKSF has a market cap of 112.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while KCKSF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas KCKSF's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KCKSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and KCKSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCKSF's competition here
ICHGF vs AGORF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, AGORF has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while AGORF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas AGORF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AGORF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and AGORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGORF's competition here
ICHGF vs SKTPP Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, SKTPP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while SKTPP trades at $178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas SKTPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SKTPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and SKTPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTPP's competition here
ICHGF vs SKTP Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, SKTP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while SKTP trades at $1,619.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas SKTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SKTP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and SKTP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKTP's competition here
ICHGF vs BUHF Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, BUHF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while BUHF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas BUHF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BUHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF is less volatile compared to BUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICHGF.Check BUHF's competition here
ICHGF vs CAGU Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, CAGU has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while CAGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas CAGU's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CAGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and CAGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAGU's competition here
ICHGF vs CNDL Comparison August 2025
ICHGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICHGF stands at 18.3B. In comparison, CNDL has a market cap of 903. Regarding current trading prices, ICHGF is priced at $119.00, while CNDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICHGF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.91, whereas CNDL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICHGF's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CNDL's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICHGF and CNDL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNDL's competition here