ICDS Limited (ICDSLTD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICDSLTD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICDSLTD.NS | ₹42.40 | -4.01% | 560M | 51.18 | ₹0.84 | N/A |
| ABREL.BO | ₹1,302.05 | -1.17% | 141.1B | -43.32 | -₹29.46 | +0.16% |
| SMARTWORKS.NS | ₹466.50 | -1.19% | 52.9B | -44.71 | -₹10.35 | N/A |
| INDIQUBE.NS | ₹170.00 | -0.19% | 37.3B | -33.33 | -₹5.28 | N/A |
| SCILAL.NS | ₹46.42 | +1.00% | 21.4B | 73.97 | ₹0.62 | +1.20% |
| EFCIL.NS | ₹193.59 | +5.56% | 19B | 11.48 | ₹16.62 | N/A |
| EFCIL.BO | ₹192.95 | +5.24% | 19B | 11.48 | ₹16.62 | N/A |
| TEXINFRA.BO | ₹110.85 | +8.69% | 13.1B | 119.22 | ₹0.86 | +0.15% |
| TEXINFRA.NS | ₹110.48 | +8.07% | 13B | 119.06 | ₹0.86 | +0.15% |
| ELDEHSG.NS | ₹791.00 | -1.13% | 7.8B | 32.13 | ₹24.72 | +1.13% |
Stock Comparison
ICDSLTD.NS vs ABREL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ABREL.BO has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ABREL.BO trades at ₹1,302.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ABREL.BO's P/E ratio is -43.32. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABREL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ABREL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ABREL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SMARTWORKS.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SMARTWORKS.NS has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SMARTWORKS.NS trades at ₹466.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SMARTWORKS.NS's P/E ratio is -44.71. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMARTWORKS.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTWORKS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SMARTWORKS.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs INDIQUBE.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, INDIQUBE.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while INDIQUBE.NS trades at ₹170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas INDIQUBE.NS's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDIQUBE.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to INDIQUBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check INDIQUBE.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SCILAL.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SCILAL.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SCILAL.NS trades at ₹46.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SCILAL.NS's P/E ratio is 73.97. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCILAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SCILAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SCILAL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs EFCIL.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, EFCIL.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while EFCIL.NS trades at ₹193.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas EFCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFCIL.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EFCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check EFCIL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs EFCIL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, EFCIL.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while EFCIL.BO trades at ₹192.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas EFCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFCIL.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EFCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check EFCIL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TEXINFRA.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, TEXINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while TEXINFRA.BO trades at ₹110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TEXINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 119.22. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TEXINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TEXINFRA.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TEXINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, TEXINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while TEXINFRA.NS trades at ₹110.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TEXINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TEXINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TEXINFRA.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ELDEHSG.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ELDEHSG.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ELDEHSG.NS trades at ₹791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ELDEHSG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELDEHSG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ELDEHSG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ELDEHSG.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ELDEHSG.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ELDEHSG.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ELDEHSG.BO trades at ₹820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ELDEHSG.BO's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELDEHSG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ELDEHSG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ELDEHSG.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs PTL.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, PTL.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while PTL.NS trades at ₹43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PTL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to PTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check PTL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs PTL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, PTL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while PTL.BO trades at ₹43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PTL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to PTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check PTL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs RDBIPL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, RDBIPL.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while RDBIPL.BO trades at ₹22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas RDBIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBIPL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to RDBIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check RDBIPL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs MODIRUBBER.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, MODIRUBBER.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while MODIRUBBER.NS trades at ₹127.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas MODIRUBBER.NS's P/E ratio is 467.33. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MODIRUBBER.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to MODIRUBBER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check MODIRUBBER.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs MODIRUBBER.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, MODIRUBBER.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while MODIRUBBER.BO trades at ₹127.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas MODIRUBBER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MODIRUBBER.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to MODIRUBBER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check MODIRUBBER.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CINELINE.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, CINELINE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while CINELINE.NS trades at ₹79.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CINELINE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CINELINE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CINELINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CINELINE.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CINELINE.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, CINELINE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while CINELINE.BO trades at ₹79.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CINELINE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CINELINE.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs RAINBOWF.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, RAINBOWF.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while RAINBOWF.BO trades at ₹41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas RAINBOWF.BO's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAINBOWF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to RAINBOWF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check RAINBOWF.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SHRADHA.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SHRADHA.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SHRADHA.NS trades at ₹33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SHRADHA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHRADHA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SHRADHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SHRADHA.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CORALFINAC.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, CORALFINAC.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while CORALFINAC.BO trades at ₹32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CORALFINAC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CORALFINAC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CORALFINAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CORALFINAC.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CORALFINAC.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, CORALFINAC.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while CORALFINAC.NS trades at ₹32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CORALFINAC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CORALFINAC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CORALFINAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CORALFINAC.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ANIRIT.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ANIRIT.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ANIRIT.BO trades at ₹57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ANIRIT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANIRIT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ANIRIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ANIRIT.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LPDC.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, LPDC.NS has a market cap of 905.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while LPDC.NS trades at ₹6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas LPDC.NS's P/E ratio is 61.36. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPDC.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LPDC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LPDC.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LPDC.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, LPDC.BO has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while LPDC.BO trades at ₹6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas LPDC.BO's P/E ratio is 62.09. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPDC.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LPDC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LPDC.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SHERVANI.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SHERVANI.BO has a market cap of 733M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SHERVANI.BO trades at ₹286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SHERVANI.BO's P/E ratio is -101.03. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHERVANI.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SHERVANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SHERVANI.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs GGDANDE.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, GGDANDE.BO has a market cap of 684.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while GGDANDE.BO trades at ₹143.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas GGDANDE.BO's P/E ratio is -21.46. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GGDANDE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to GGDANDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check GGDANDE.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs FMNL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, FMNL.BO has a market cap of 684.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while FMNL.BO trades at ₹10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas FMNL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMNL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to FMNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check FMNL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs FMNL.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, FMNL.NS has a market cap of 662.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while FMNL.NS trades at ₹10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas FMNL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMNL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to FMNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check FMNL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs 3PLAND.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, 3PLAND.NS has a market cap of 582.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while 3PLAND.NS trades at ₹33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas 3PLAND.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3PLAND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to 3PLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check 3PLAND.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs 3PLAND.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, 3PLAND.BO has a market cap of 566.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while 3PLAND.BO trades at ₹31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas 3PLAND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3PLAND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to 3PLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check 3PLAND.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ICDSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ICDSLTD.BO has a market cap of 560M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ICDSLTD.BO trades at ₹44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ICDSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICDSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ICDSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ICDSLTD.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TATIAGLOB.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, TATIAGLOB.BO has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while TATIAGLOB.BO trades at ₹2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TATIAGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TATIAGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TATIAGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TATIAGLOB.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs GGDPROP.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, GGDPROP.BO has a market cap of 316.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while GGDPROP.BO trades at ₹64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas GGDPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GGDPROP.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to GGDPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check GGDPROP.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs NARPROP.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, NARPROP.BO has a market cap of 262.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while NARPROP.BO trades at ₹36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas NARPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NARPROP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to NARPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check NARPROP.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SFPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SFPIL.BO has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SFPIL.BO trades at ₹9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SFPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFPIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SFPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SFPIL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs STLSTRINF.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, STLSTRINF.BO has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while STLSTRINF.BO trades at ₹19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas STLSTRINF.BO's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STLSTRINF.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to STLSTRINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check STLSTRINF.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs DML.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, DML.BO has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while DML.BO trades at ₹14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas DML.BO's P/E ratio is -63.64. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DML.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to DML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check DML.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ASIAPAK.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, ASIAPAK.BO has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while ASIAPAK.BO trades at ₹46.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ASIAPAK.BO's P/E ratio is 52.39. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIAPAK.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ASIAPAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ASIAPAK.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SPSL.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, SPSL.BO has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while SPSL.BO trades at ₹15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SPSL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPSL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SPSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SPSL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LADDU.BO Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, LADDU.BO has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while LADDU.BO trades at ₹0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas LADDU.BO's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LADDU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LADDU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LADDU.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs BHAGYAPROP.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, BHAGYAPROP.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while BHAGYAPROP.NS trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas BHAGYAPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHAGYAPROP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGYAPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check BHAGYAPROP.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TCIDEVELOP.NS Comparison June 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 560M. In comparison, TCIDEVELOP.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹42.40, while TCIDEVELOP.NS trades at ₹388.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TCIDEVELOP.NS's P/E ratio is 118.72. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCIDEVELOP.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TCIDEVELOP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TCIDEVELOP.NS's competition here