ICDS Limited
ICDS Limited (ICDSLTD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICDSLTD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICDSLTD.NS | ₹41.02 | -4.91% | 534.4M | 22.79 | ₹1.80 | N/A |
| ABREL.BO | ₹1,143.65 | -1.03% | 126.4B | -37.07 | -₹30.85 | +0.17% |
| SMARTWORKS.NS | ₹374.90 | -2.04% | 42.8B | -36.08 | -₹10.39 | N/A |
| INDIQUBE.NS | ₹143.40 | +4.23% | 30.4B | -26.46 | -₹5.42 | N/A |
| EFCIL.NS | ₹189.13 | -0.44% | 18.8B | 11.84 | ₹15.98 | N/A |
| SCILAL.NS | ₹39.92 | +1.71% | 18.6B | -9.55 | -₹4.18 | +1.38% |
| TEXINFRA.NS | ₹97.79 | +1.25% | 12.5B | 109.88 | ₹0.89 | +0.15% |
| TEXINFRA.BO | ₹97.77 | +0.91% | 12.5B | 109.85 | ₹0.89 | +0.15% |
| ELDEHSG.BO | ₹784.65 | +5.74% | 7.7B | 34.07 | ₹23.03 | +1.15% |
| ELDEHSG.NS | ₹781.45 | -0.48% | 7.7B | 33.89 | ₹23.06 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
ICDSLTD.NS vs ABREL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ABREL.BO has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ABREL.BO trades at ₹1,143.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ABREL.BO's P/E ratio is -37.07. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABREL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ABREL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ABREL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SMARTWORKS.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SMARTWORKS.NS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SMARTWORKS.NS trades at ₹374.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SMARTWORKS.NS's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMARTWORKS.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTWORKS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SMARTWORKS.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs INDIQUBE.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, INDIQUBE.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while INDIQUBE.NS trades at ₹143.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas INDIQUBE.NS's P/E ratio is -26.46. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIQUBE.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to INDIQUBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check INDIQUBE.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs EFCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, EFCIL.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while EFCIL.NS trades at ₹189.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas EFCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFCIL.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to EFCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check EFCIL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SCILAL.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SCILAL.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SCILAL.NS trades at ₹39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SCILAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCILAL.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to SCILAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SCILAL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TEXINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, TEXINFRA.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while TEXINFRA.NS trades at ₹97.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TEXINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 109.88. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEXINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TEXINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TEXINFRA.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TEXINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, TEXINFRA.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while TEXINFRA.BO trades at ₹97.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TEXINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 109.85. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEXINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TEXINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TEXINFRA.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ELDEHSG.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ELDEHSG.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ELDEHSG.BO trades at ₹784.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ELDEHSG.BO's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELDEHSG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ELDEHSG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ELDEHSG.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ELDEHSG.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ELDEHSG.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ELDEHSG.NS trades at ₹781.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ELDEHSG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELDEHSG.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ELDEHSG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ELDEHSG.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs RDBIPL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, RDBIPL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while RDBIPL.BO trades at ₹32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas RDBIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDBIPL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to RDBIPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check RDBIPL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TREL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, TREL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while TREL.BO trades at ₹25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TREL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TREL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TREL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TREL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs PTL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, PTL.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while PTL.BO trades at ₹37.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas PTL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to PTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check PTL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs PTL.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, PTL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while PTL.NS trades at ₹37.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas PTL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to PTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check PTL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs MODIRUBBER.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, MODIRUBBER.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while MODIRUBBER.BO trades at ₹112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MODIRUBBER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MODIRUBBER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MODIRUBBER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check MODIRUBBER.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs MODIRUBBER.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, MODIRUBBER.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while MODIRUBBER.NS trades at ₹112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MODIRUBBER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MODIRUBBER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MODIRUBBER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check MODIRUBBER.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CINELINE.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, CINELINE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while CINELINE.NS trades at ₹80.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CINELINE.NS's P/E ratio is -69.53. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CINELINE.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CINELINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CINELINE.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CINELINE.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, CINELINE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while CINELINE.BO trades at ₹80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is -69.41. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CINELINE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CINELINE.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs RAINBOWF.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, RAINBOWF.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while RAINBOWF.BO trades at ₹43.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas RAINBOWF.BO's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAINBOWF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to RAINBOWF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check RAINBOWF.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SHRADHA.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SHRADHA.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SHRADHA.NS trades at ₹30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SHRADHA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRADHA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to SHRADHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SHRADHA.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CORALFINAC.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, CORALFINAC.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while CORALFINAC.NS trades at ₹27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CORALFINAC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORALFINAC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CORALFINAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CORALFINAC.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs CORALFINAC.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, CORALFINAC.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while CORALFINAC.BO trades at ₹26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CORALFINAC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORALFINAC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CORALFINAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check CORALFINAC.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs MOTOGENFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, MOTOGENFIN.BO has a market cap of 834.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while MOTOGENFIN.BO trades at ₹21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MOTOGENFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.23. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTOGENFIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to MOTOGENFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check MOTOGENFIN.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ANIRIT.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ANIRIT.BO has a market cap of 810M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ANIRIT.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ANIRIT.BO's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANIRIT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ANIRIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ANIRIT.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LPDC.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, LPDC.BO has a market cap of 778M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while LPDC.BO trades at ₹5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LPDC.BO's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPDC.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LPDC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LPDC.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SHERVANI.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SHERVANI.BO has a market cap of 777.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SHERVANI.BO trades at ₹302.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SHERVANI.BO's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHERVANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SHERVANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SHERVANI.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LPDC.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, LPDC.NS has a market cap of 774M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while LPDC.NS trades at ₹5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LPDC.NS's P/E ratio is -18.03. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPDC.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LPDC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LPDC.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs GGDANDE.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, GGDANDE.BO has a market cap of 684.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while GGDANDE.BO trades at ₹143.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas GGDANDE.BO's P/E ratio is -21.46. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGDANDE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GGDANDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check GGDANDE.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ICDSLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ICDSLTD.BO has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ICDSLTD.BO trades at ₹42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ICDSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICDSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ICDSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ICDSLTD.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs 3PLAND.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, 3PLAND.BO has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while 3PLAND.BO trades at ₹30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas 3PLAND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3PLAND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to 3PLAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check 3PLAND.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs FMNL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, FMNL.BO has a market cap of 473.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while FMNL.BO trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas FMNL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FMNL.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to FMNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check FMNL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs FMNL.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, FMNL.NS has a market cap of 473.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while FMNL.NS trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas FMNL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FMNL.NS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to FMNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check FMNL.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TATIAGLOB.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, TATIAGLOB.BO has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while TATIAGLOB.BO trades at ₹2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TATIAGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATIAGLOB.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TATIAGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TATIAGLOB.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs NARPROP.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, NARPROP.BO has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while NARPROP.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NARPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NARPROP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NARPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check NARPROP.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs GGDPROP.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, GGDPROP.BO has a market cap of 242.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while GGDPROP.BO trades at ₹50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas GGDPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGDPROP.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GGDPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check GGDPROP.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs STLSTRINF.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, STLSTRINF.BO has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while STLSTRINF.BO trades at ₹19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas STLSTRINF.BO's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STLSTRINF.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to STLSTRINF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check STLSTRINF.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SFPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SFPIL.BO has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SFPIL.BO trades at ₹8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SFPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFPIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SFPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SFPIL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs LADDU.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, LADDU.BO has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while LADDU.BO trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LADDU.BO's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LADDU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to LADDU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check LADDU.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs ASIAPAK.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, ASIAPAK.BO has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while ASIAPAK.BO trades at ₹42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ASIAPAK.BO's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASIAPAK.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ASIAPAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check ASIAPAK.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs DML.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, DML.BO has a market cap of 96.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while DML.BO trades at ₹10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas DML.BO's P/E ratio is -45.45. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DML.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is less volatile compared to DML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check DML.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs SPSL.BO Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, SPSL.BO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while SPSL.BO trades at ₹11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SPSL.BO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPSL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to SPSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check SPSL.BO's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs BHAGYAPROP.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, BHAGYAPROP.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while BHAGYAPROP.NS trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas BHAGYAPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHAGYAPROP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGYAPROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check BHAGYAPROP.NS's competition here
ICDSLTD.NS vs TCIDEVELOP.NS Comparison April 2026
ICDSLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICDSLTD.NS stands at 534.4M. In comparison, TCIDEVELOP.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICDSLTD.NS is priced at ₹41.02, while TCIDEVELOP.NS trades at ₹388.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICDSLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TCIDEVELOP.NS's P/E ratio is 118.72. In terms of profitability, ICDSLTD.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCIDEVELOP.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICDSLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TCIDEVELOP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICDSLTD.NS.Check TCIDEVELOP.NS's competition here