i-CABLE Communications Limited
i-CABLE Communications Limited (ICABF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICABF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICABF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 7.1M | -0.10 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| UNVGY | $14.71 | +2.87% | 53.6B | 17.72 | $0.82 | +2.20% |
| UMGNF | $29.59 | +4.14% | 53.4B | 17.74 | $1.64 | +2.01% |
| FWONB | $95.00 | +5.56% | 34.4B | 94.06 | $1.01 | N/A |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.1B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| BOIVF | $5.89 | +0.77% | 16.7B | 99.71 | $0.06 | +1.47% |
| CEVMY | $30.50 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 33.89 | $0.90 | +0.97% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $62.01 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 40.01 | $1.55 | +1.50% |
| CEVMF | $94.15 | -19.53% | 9B | 26.15 | $3.60 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
ICABF vs UNVGY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UNVGY trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check UNVGY's competition here
ICABF vs UMGNF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UMGNF trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check UMGNF's competition here
ICABF vs FWONB Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while FWONB trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 94.06. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FWONB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and FWONB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWONB's competition here
ICABF vs NWSAL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NWSAL's competition here
ICABF vs BOIVF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BOIVF trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 99.71. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BOIVF's competition here
ICABF vs CEVMY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEVMY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CEVMY's competition here
ICABF vs VIVEF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and VIVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIVEF's competition here
ICABF vs TKCOF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TKCOF trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and TKCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCOF's competition here
ICABF vs CEVMF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEVMF trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CEVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEVMF's competition here
ICABF vs TOEAF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TOEAF trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check TOEAF's competition here
ICABF vs VIVHY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VIVHY trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -19.08. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check VIVHY's competition here
ICABF vs MCHOY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MCHOY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 45.53. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MCHOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHOY's competition here
ICABF vs MCOIF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MCOIF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check MCOIF's competition here
ICABF vs NANHF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and NANHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NANHF's competition here
ICABF vs NNMTF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NNMTF's competition here
ICABF vs NENTY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and NENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NENTY's competition here
ICABF vs CYFWF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CYFWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYFWF's competition here
ICABF vs CYFWY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CYFWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYFWY's competition here
ICABF vs MHSDF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MHSDF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check MHSDF's competition here
ICABF vs AIOSF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AIOSF's competition here
ICABF vs CIEZF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CIEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIEZF's competition here
ICABF vs ATVDY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ATVDY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ATVDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATVDY's competition here
ICABF vs JVTSF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while JVTSF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -343.90. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check JVTSF's competition here
ICABF vs TCLRY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check TCLRY's competition here
ICABF vs CPXGF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CPXGF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CPXGF's competition here
ICABF vs BORUF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BORUF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BORUF's competition here
ICABF vs IMXCF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while IMXCF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check IMXCF's competition here
ICABF vs WLDBF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 291.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WLDBF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check WLDBF's competition here
ICABF vs CLTFF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CLTFF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLTFF's competition here
ICABF vs AFCJF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AFCJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AFCJF's competition here
ICABF vs CLQDF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CLQDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLQDF's competition here
ICABF vs NENTF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NENTF's competition here
ICABF vs GOAI Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GOAI trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GOAI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GOAI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOAI's competition here
ICABF vs APTTF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while APTTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APTTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and APTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTTF's competition here
ICABF vs STEAF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check STEAF's competition here
ICABF vs ANGMF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ANGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANGMF's competition here
ICABF vs THBRF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while THBRF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check THBRF's competition here
ICABF vs GMSQF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check GMSQF's competition here
ICABF vs ICABY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ICABY trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check ICABY's competition here
ICABF vs OAMCF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while OAMCF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check OAMCF's competition here
ICABF vs ZUMRF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ZUMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZUMRF's competition here
ICABF vs LGMH Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check LGMH's competition here
ICABF vs APHP Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while APHP trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APHP's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and APHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APHP's competition here
ICABF vs ASGRF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ASGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGRF's competition here
ICABF vs QYOUF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while QYOUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check QYOUF's competition here
ICABF vs HWAL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HWAL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HWAL's competition here
ICABF vs BBOP Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BBOP's competition here
ICABF vs CNWGQ Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CNWGQ's competition here
ICABF vs XOEEF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check XOEEF's competition here
ICABF vs CNNWQ Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CNNWQ's competition here
ICABF vs AMFL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMFL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AMFL's competition here
ICABF vs GULDF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check GULDF's competition here
ICABF vs TRMNF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TRMNF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check TRMNF's competition here
ICABF vs ENTEF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ENTEF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +602.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check ENTEF's competition here
ICABF vs MVNC Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check MVNC's competition here
ICABF vs HHSE Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HHSE's competition here
ICABF vs LTES Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check LTES's competition here
ICABF vs CAPV Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CAPV's competition here
ICABF vs ITVI Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ITVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITVI's competition here
ICABF vs HQGE Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and HQGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HQGE's competition here
ICABF vs BLIBQ Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BLIBQ's competition here
ICABF vs BSEG Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BSEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSEG's competition here
ICABF vs NETWF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NETWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NETWF's competition here
ICABF vs EEGI Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check EEGI's competition here
ICABF vs STGZ Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STGZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and STGZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STGZ's competition here
ICABF vs HDUP Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HDUP's competition here
ICABF vs BLIAQ Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BLIAQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BLIAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLIAQ's competition here
ICABF vs STCXF Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check STCXF's competition here
ICABF vs SEGI Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SEGI's competition here
ICABF vs SONG Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SONG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SONG's competition here
ICABF vs AFOM Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AFOM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFOM's competition here
ICABF vs WRIT Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 736K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and WRIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRIT's competition here
ICABF vs DTTVY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 695.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while DTTVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check DTTVY's competition here
ICABF vs RLTR Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 591.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check RLTR's competition here
ICABF vs VNUE Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 590.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and VNUE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNUE's competition here
ICABF vs CCLX Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CCLX's competition here
ICABF vs UMGP Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 496.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UMGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and UMGP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UMGP's competition here
ICABF vs TAMG Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and TAMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAMG's competition here
ICABF vs BOTY Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BOTY's competition here
ICABF vs WEBB Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and WEBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBB's competition here
ICABF vs IMTV Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check IMTV's competition here
ICABF vs CEXE Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CEXE's competition here
ICABF vs RIVU Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and RIVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIVU's competition here
ICABF vs MIKP Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MIKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIKP's competition here
ICABF vs VGTL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 205.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and VGTL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGTL's competition here
ICABF vs MLFB Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MLFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLFB's competition here
ICABF vs SNMN Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and SNMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNMN's competition here
ICABF vs RWMI Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 77K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and RWMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWMI's competition here
ICABF vs URBT Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and URBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URBT's competition here
ICABF vs SVSN Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SVSN's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SVSN's competition here
ICABF vs GBHL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GBHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBHL's competition here
ICABF vs AMRU Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AMRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRU's competition here
ICABF vs SAKL Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 39.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SAKL's competition here
ICABF vs HOMU Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HOMU's competition here
ICABF vs XSPT Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and XSPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSPT's competition here
ICABF vs SAPX Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 32.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and SAPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAPX's competition here
ICABF vs PLFX Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 28.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check PLFX's competition here
ICABF vs GTOR Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GTOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTOR's competition here
ICABF vs AMXX Comparison August 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 7.1M. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AMXX's competition here