i-CABLE Communications Limited
i-CABLE Communications Limited (ICABF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICABF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICABF | $0.00 | -0.00% | 5M | -0.07 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| UMGNF | $32.78 | -1.56% | 60.1B | 24.84 | $1.32 | +1.77% |
| UNVGY | $16.33 | -0.91% | 59.9B | 24.76 | $0.66 | +2.58% |
| FWONB | $91.75 | +0.00% | 32.2B | 1529.17 | $0.06 | N/A |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| BOIVF | $6.14 | -2.38% | 17.3B | 103.47 | $0.06 | +1.41% |
| CEVMY | $31.60 | +1.61% | 12.1B | 34.73 | $0.91 | +0.94% |
| CEVMF | $123.35 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 33.98 | $3.63 | +1.54% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TKCOF | $62.01 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 39.75 | $1.56 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
ICABF vs UMGNF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UMGNF trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check UMGNF's competition here
ICABF vs UNVGY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UNVGY trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check UNVGY's competition here
ICABF vs FWONB Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while FWONB trades at $91.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1529.17. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and FWONB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWONB's competition here
ICABF vs NWSAL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NWSAL's competition here
ICABF vs BOIVF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BOIVF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 103.47. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BOIVF's competition here
ICABF vs CEVMY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEVMY trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CEVMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEVMY's competition here
ICABF vs CEVMF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEVMF trades at $123.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CEVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEVMF's competition here
ICABF vs VIVEF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and VIVEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIVEF's competition here
ICABF vs TKCOF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TKCOF trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and TKCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKCOF's competition here
ICABF vs TOEAF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TOEAF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and TOEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOEAF's competition here
ICABF vs VIVHY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VIVHY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check VIVHY's competition here
ICABF vs MCHOY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MCHOY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MCHOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHOY's competition here
ICABF vs MCOIF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MCOIF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check MCOIF's competition here
ICABF vs NANHF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and NANHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NANHF's competition here
ICABF vs NNMTF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NNMTF's competition here
ICABF vs NENTY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and NENTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NENTY's competition here
ICABF vs CYFWF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CYFWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYFWF's competition here
ICABF vs JVTSF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while JVTSF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -373.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and JVTSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JVTSF's competition here
ICABF vs CYFWY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CYFWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYFWY's competition here
ICABF vs MHSDF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MHSDF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MHSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MHSDF's competition here
ICABF vs AIOSF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AIOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIOSF's competition here
ICABF vs ATVDY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ATVDY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ATVDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATVDY's competition here
ICABF vs TCLRY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check TCLRY's competition here
ICABF vs CIEZF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CIEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIEZF's competition here
ICABF vs CPXGF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 522.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CPXGF trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CPXGF's competition here
ICABF vs BORUF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 516.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BORUF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BORUF's competition here
ICABF vs IMXCF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while IMXCF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check IMXCF's competition here
ICABF vs WLDBF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WLDBF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check WLDBF's competition here
ICABF vs BLIAQ Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 290M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BLIAQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BLIAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLIAQ's competition here
ICABF vs CLTFF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CLTFF trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLTFF's competition here
ICABF vs AFCJF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AFCJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AFCJF's competition here
ICABF vs CLQDF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CLQDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLQDF's competition here
ICABF vs NENTF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NENTF's competition here
ICABF vs APTTF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while APTTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and APTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTTF's competition here
ICABF vs GOAI Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GOAI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -52.86. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GOAI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GOAI's competition here
ICABF vs STEAF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and STEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STEAF's competition here
ICABF vs ANGMF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ANGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANGMF's competition here
ICABF vs THBRF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while THBRF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check THBRF's competition here
ICABF vs GMSQF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check GMSQF's competition here
ICABF vs ZUMRF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ZUMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZUMRF's competition here
ICABF vs ICABY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ICABY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check ICABY's competition here
ICABF vs LGMH Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check LGMH's competition here
ICABF vs DTTVY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and DTTVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTTVY's competition here
ICABF vs OAMCF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while OAMCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check OAMCF's competition here
ICABF vs APHP Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while APHP trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check APHP's competition here
ICABF vs ASGRF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ASGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGRF's competition here
ICABF vs BBOP Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BBOP's competition here
ICABF vs QYOUF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while QYOUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check QYOUF's competition here
ICABF vs CNWGQ Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CNWGQ's competition here
ICABF vs AMFL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMFL trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check AMFL's competition here
ICABF vs XOEEF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check XOEEF's competition here
ICABF vs HWAL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HWAL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HWAL's competition here
ICABF vs CNNWQ Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CNNWQ's competition here
ICABF vs HHSE Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check HHSE's competition here
ICABF vs MVNC Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check MVNC's competition here
ICABF vs TRMNF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TRMNF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check TRMNF's competition here
ICABF vs ENTEF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ENTEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +602.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check ENTEF's competition here
ICABF vs STGZ Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STGZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check STGZ's competition here
ICABF vs EEGI Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check EEGI's competition here
ICABF vs LTES Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check LTES's competition here
ICABF vs GULDF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check GULDF's competition here
ICABF vs CAPV Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CAPV's competition here
ICABF vs ITVI Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and ITVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITVI's competition here
ICABF vs NETWF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while NETWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check NETWF's competition here
ICABF vs BSEG Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BSEG's competition here
ICABF vs HDUP Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and HDUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDUP's competition here
ICABF vs BLIBQ Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and BLIBQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLIBQ's competition here
ICABF vs STCXF Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check STCXF's competition here
ICABF vs SEGI Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and SEGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEGI's competition here
ICABF vs SONG Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SONG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SONG's competition here
ICABF vs AFOM Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AFOM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFOM's competition here
ICABF vs RLTR Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 901.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RLTR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check RLTR's competition here
ICABF vs HQGE Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and HQGE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HQGE's competition here
ICABF vs WRIT Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 697.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and WRIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRIT's competition here
ICABF vs VNUE Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 590.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check VNUE's competition here
ICABF vs UMGP Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 582.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check UMGP's competition here
ICABF vs CCLX Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and CCLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCLX's competition here
ICABF vs TAMG Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and TAMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAMG's competition here
ICABF vs BOTY Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BOTY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check BOTY's competition here
ICABF vs WEBB Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and WEBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBB's competition here
ICABF vs IMTV Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and IMTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMTV's competition here
ICABF vs CEXE Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check CEXE's competition here
ICABF vs RIVU Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and RIVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIVU's competition here
ICABF vs MIKP Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MIKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIKP's competition here
ICABF vs VGTL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 205.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check VGTL's competition here
ICABF vs MLFB Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and MLFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLFB's competition here
ICABF vs SNMN Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and SNMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNMN's competition here
ICABF vs RWMI Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 95.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check RWMI's competition here
ICABF vs PLFX Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 85.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and PLFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLFX's competition here
ICABF vs SAPX Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 65.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SAPX's competition here
ICABF vs URBT Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and URBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URBT's competition here
ICABF vs SVSN Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and SVSN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVSN's competition here
ICABF vs GBHL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GBHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBHL's competition here
ICABF vs AMRU Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AMRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRU's competition here
ICABF vs HOMU Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and HOMU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOMU's competition here
ICABF vs SAKL Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 33.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF is less volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICABF.Check SAKL's competition here
ICABF vs XSPT Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and XSPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSPT's competition here
ICABF vs GTOR Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and GTOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTOR's competition here
ICABF vs AMXX Comparison July 2025
ICABF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICABF stands at 5M. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICABF is priced at $0.00, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICABF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICABF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICABF and AMXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMXX's competition here