IC Capitalight Corp.
IC Capitalight Corp. IC.CN Peers
See (IC.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC.CN | CA$0.15 | +3.57% | 17M | -14.50 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| BLK.NE | CA$27.44 | +0.15% | 218.7B | 24.95 | CA$1.10 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$84.28 | -0.15% | 138.9B | 210.70 | CA$0.40 | +0.56% |
| BAM.TO | CA$75.37 | -0.37% | 121.5B | 40.30 | CA$1.87 | +3.05% |
| VFV.TO | CA$149.87 | -0.29% | 21.1B | 26.26 | CA$5.71 | +1.02% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$92.40 | -0.05% | 18.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.92% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$34.54 | +0.79% | 16B | 3.66 | CA$9.43 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$40.41 | +0.57% | 14.2B | 21.90 | CA$1.85 | +3.04% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.40 | -0.52% | 11.3B | 16.66 | CA$2.55 | +2.63% |
| VUN.TO | CA$112.71 | -0.17% | 10.9B | 25.48 | CA$4.42 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
IC.CN vs BLK.NE Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 218.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BLK.NE trades at CA$27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs BN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BN.TO trades at CA$84.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 210.70. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs BAM.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BAM.TO trades at CA$75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VFV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VFV.TO trades at CA$149.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZSP.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs PHYS.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XIU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XIU.TO trades at CA$40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XEF.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VUN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VUN.TO trades at CA$112.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs IGM.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IGM.TO trades at CA$43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZCN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZEA.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XIC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XIC.TO trades at CA$42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs PSLV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XSP.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XSP.TO trades at CA$63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VCN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VCN.TO trades at CA$54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XUS.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XUS.TO trades at CA$52.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CEF.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CEF.TO trades at CA$40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ONEX.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XEQT.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VEQT.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$47.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VGRO.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CASH.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CSAV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VIU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZEB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZLB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs PSA.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CIX.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.13. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VSP.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VSP.TO trades at CA$99.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZCS.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HXS.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HXS.TO trades at CA$86.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs QUU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while QUU.TO trades at CA$243.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HXT.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HXT.TO trades at CA$70.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XUU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XUU.TO trades at CA$62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VDY.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VDY.TO trades at CA$52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs TPU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TPU.TO trades at CA$48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VBAL.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZUE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XQQ.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$56.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XSEM.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZWB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs TTP.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TTP.TO trades at CA$30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XGRO.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs BBUC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XAW.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XAW.TO trades at CA$46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs TPE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XBB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs SII.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SII.TO trades at CA$94.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VEE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VEE.TO trades at CA$40.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs NSCE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VXC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VXC.TO trades at CA$66.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XEC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XEC.TO trades at CA$31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs PFMN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VCE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VCE.TO trades at CA$58.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XDIV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XCB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$156.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZLU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CMR.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VGG.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VGG.TO trades at CA$94.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XBAL.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HSAV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs MNY.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs QCN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while QCN.TO trades at CA$163.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 61.97. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XIN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XFN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XFN.TO trades at CA$65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZWU.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XEI.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XEI.TO trades at CA$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs QQC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while QQC.TO trades at CA$36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XDV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CACB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CYB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CYB.TO trades at CA$79.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CBIL.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ISIF.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN and ISIF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IC.CN vs ZWC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XFH.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XGB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XSH.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs UNC.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while UNC.TO trades at CA$135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs EQL.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EQL.TO trades at CA$37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZPR.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZGB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZEM.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HMAX.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HXCN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs VSB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs RIIN.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$87.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XEG.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XEG.TO trades at CA$16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs MUB.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MUB.TO trades at CA$18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XRE.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XRE.TO trades at CA$15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs XWD.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while XWD.TO trades at CA$98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs HHL.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HHL.TO trades at CA$7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs FCUV.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs CVG.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, CVG.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CVG.TO trades at CA$77.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas CVG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to CVG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to CVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.
IC.CN vs EVT.TO Comparison
IC.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IC.CN stands at 17M. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IC.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EVT.TO trades at CA$20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IC.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.50, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, IC.CN's ROE is -1.08%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IC.CN is less volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IC.CN.